Halipeurus noctivagus Timmermann, 1961

(Fig. 53)

Lipeurus diversus var. major Kellogg & Kuwana, 1902: 477 (not Lipeurus major Piaget, 1880). Type host: Puffinus lherminieri subalaris Ridgway, 1897 (in error). Syntypes Ƥ, presumed lost.

“ Lipeurus diversus ” Kellogg, 1906: 318 (not Lipeurus diversus Kellogg, 1896). In part H. noctivagus Timmermann, 1960; in part H. attenuatus Edwards, 1961 .

“ Lipeurus limitatus ” Kellogg, 1906: 319 (not Lipeurus limitatus Kellogg, 1896). In part H. noctivagus Timmermann, 1960; in part H. attenuatus Edwards, 1961 .

Halipeurus sp.?; Thompson, 1938: 485.

Halipeurus noctivagus Timmermann, 1960: 331, fig. 13, 16b. Type host: Pterodroma phaeopygia phaeopygia (Salvin, 1876) . Holotype 3 in NHML, slide 8215.

Halipeurus (Halipeurus) intermedius Edwards, 1961: 151, figs 3S–7S. Nomen novum for Lipeurus diversus var. major Kellogg & Kuwana, 1902 .

Halipeurus (Halipeurus) noctivagus; Timmermann, 1965: 151, fig. 92.

Halipeurus noctivagus; Imber & Tennyson, 2001: 125.

Halipeurus (Halipeurus) noctivagus; Price et al., 2003: 188.

MATERIAL EXAMINED

Types

Ex Pterodroma phaeopygia phaeopygia: 1 3 paratype of Halipeurus noctivagus, Galápagos Is, no date (NHML, Meinertzhagen Collection 8215). “ Holotype ” 3 and “allotype” Ƥ (see below) of Halipeurus (Halipeurus) intermedius, Galápagos Is, no date, RLE 73, 74 (AMNH).

Ex Pterodroma cervicalis (Salvin, 1891): 23, 2Ƥ “ paratypes ” of Halipeurus (Halipeurus) intermedius, Kermadec Is, South Pacific Ocean, no date (AMNH, RLE 70; NHML, Thompson Collection).

Non-types

Ex Pterodroma phaeopygia phaeopygia: 1Ƥ, Cape St. Elena, Ecuador, 21 June 1922, A. Wetmore (KCEM); 13, 2Ƥ, Chile, 1969, T.J. Lewis (KCEM; USNM); 133, 13Ƥ, Bellavista, Santa Cruz I., Galápagos Is, 1971–1972, P. Kramer (MONZ); 13, Kauai Island, Hawaiian Is, U.S.A., 25 Apr. 1978, USNM 556902 (KCEM); 73, 3Ƥ, Santa Cruz I., Galápagos Is, 18 Aug. 1986, F. Cruz (MONZ).

Ex Pterodroma cervicalis: 83, 7Ƥ, Kermadec Is, South Pacific Ocean, 1895, Buller Collection O.1237.6 (RLCP); 13, 2Ƥ, at sea, Pacific Ocean, 0 8o29’N- 162o33’W, 13 Jun. 1965, POBSP 4031 (USNM); 33, 2Ƥ, at sea, Pacific Ocean, 19 Jun. 1965, POBSP 4274 (USNM); 13, 4Ƥ, Mamaku Range, N.Z., Apr. 1968, Wildlife Service, DM 15736 (MONZ); 2Ƥ, Macauley I., Kermadec Is, N.Z., 21 Nov. 1970, B.D. Bell (MONZ); 43, 13Ƥ, Macauley I., Kermadec Is, N.Z., 25 Nov. 1970, J.C. Yaldwyn (MONZ); 53, 3Ƥ, Macauley I., Kermadec Is, N.Z., 20 Nov. 1980, B.D. Bell (MONZ); 103, 10Ƥ, Macauley I., Kermadec Is, N.Z., 21 Nov. 1980, D.M. Cunningham (MONZ). Ex Pterodroma occulta Imber & Tennyson, 2001: 63, 11Ƥ, 30 miles E of Mera Lava, Banks Is, Vanuatu, 28 Jan. 1927, R.H. Beck, “Whitney South Sea Expedition” (MONZ); 153, 15Ƥ, Mt Suretamatai, Vanua Lava I., Banks Is, Vanuatu, 5–9 Mar. 2011, A.J.D. Tennyson (MONZ).

DISCUSSION: Edwards (1961: 152) examined the two syntypes of Lipeurus diversus var. major, and qualified them as stragglers. I agree with Edwards in regarding those syntypes as stragglers, but I have not been able to examine them. In the course of my research on the lice from the Galápagos Islands, I have examined all specimens from those islands included in the Kellogg Collection held at CISC. Unfortunately, the syntypes of L. diversus var. major were not among them. Although Edwards (1961: 151) clearly indicated that H. (H.) intermedius was a nomen novum, he still designated a holotype, an allotype and paratypes for his new name. That designation contravenes Article 72.7 of the I.C.Z.N. (1999) Code, which states that the types of a nomen novum are the same as those of the preocuppied name it replaces. Therefore, the specimens listed above as “ types ” of H. (H.) intermedius are, in fact, not types.

The Timmermann (1960: 330, fig. 16b) illustration of the female last segment, taken from the allotype of H. noctivagus, has a clear angular indentation in its distal margin. However, all females listed above—identified as H. noctivagus according to males in the same samples—have terminalia with a slightly convex distal margin (Fig. 53). Timmermann (1965: 152) realised that females described by Edwards (1961: 138, fig. 4S) from the same host were much larger than the allotype of H. noctivagus and that also differed from it in the shape of the distal margin; therefore, he admitted that the “allotype” belonged to another species, not H. noctivagus .