identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
7C62D879C8CF52A980D3234D95894913.text	7C62D879C8CF52A980D3234D95894913.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Colletotrichum castaneae Y. Q. Yang, Q. Zhang, K. D. Hyde & Yong Wang bis	<div><p>Colletotrichum castaneae Y. Q. Yang, Q. Zhang, K. D. Hyde &amp; Yong Wang bis, in Zhang et al., Mycosphere 14 (2): 24 (2023)</p><p>Figs 2, 6</p><p>Description.</p><p>Associated with leaf spots of Jasminum grandiflorum . Leaf spots irregular, pale brown to brown. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiomata 150–500 µm diam. (x ̄ = 250 µm, n = 5), semi-immersed, scattered or segregated, globose to subglobose, dark brown to black, exuding glistening yellowish to orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Conidiophores hyaline. Conidiogenous cells 6.5–28 × 2–5 µm (x ̄ = 18.6 × 3.1 µm, n = 10), hyaline, cylindrical to ampulliform, solitary or branched, straight or flexuous, tapering towards the apex. Conidia 13.5–19.5 × 4–6 µm (x ̄ = 16.1 × 5 µm, n = 30; L / W ratio = 3.2), hyaline, cylindrical, straight, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, mostly with rounded ends. Appressoria not observed.</p><p>Culture characteristics.</p><p>Colonies on PDA reaching approximately 65 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 ° C; mycelium initially white, becoming yellowish to olivaceous brown with age; elevation flat, aerial, and filamentous with an entire or undulate margin.</p><p>Specimens examined.</p><p>Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Doi Inthanon National Park, Kew Mae Pan nature trail, associated with leaf spots of Jasminum grandiflorum ( Oleaceae), 20 Oct 2021, D. Gomdola DGJas 3 (L 6) - C (MFLU 25-0003, BHH 50477), living culture MFLUCC 25-0004; DGJas 3 (L 9) - B (MFLU 25-0004, BHH 50479), living culture MFLUCC 25-0005 .</p><p>GenBank accession numbers.</p><p>MFLUCC 25-0004; ITS = PV 263291; GAPDH = PV 290897; CHS 1 = PV 274248; ACT = PV 297874; and TUB 2 = PV 295617; MFLUCC 25-0005; ITS = PV 263292; GAPDH = PV 290898; CHS 1 = PV 274249; ACT = PV 297875; and TUB 2 = PV 295618.</p><p>Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles.</p><p>Associated with leaf spots of Castanea mollissima in China (Zhang et al. 2023 a) and Jasminum grandiflorum in Thailand (this study).</p><p>Notes.</p><p>Based on the phylogenetic analyses, our isolates (MFLUCC 25-0004 and MFLUCC 25-0005) grouped with 100 % ML and 1.00 PP support. This sub-clade grouped with Colletotrichum castaneae (GUCC 21268.4, GUCC 12179, and GUCC 12176) with 100 % ML and 1.00 PP support (Fig. 2). As per our findings, C. castaneae is located within the C. gloeosporioides species complex (Figs 1, 2), consistent with the study of Zhang et al. (2023 a). No nucleotide differences were observed in the ITS region (526 bp) between our isolates and C. castaneae (GUCC 21268.4). The following sequence divergences were noted across other regions: 0.4 % in GAPDH (1 / 228 bp), 0.9 % in ACT (2 / 231 bp), 1.3 % in CHS 1 (3 / 225 bp), and 0.6 % in TUB 2 (3 / 495 bp).</p><p>MFLUCC 25-0004 and MFLUCC 25-0005 morphologically resemble the ex-type of C. castaneae (GUCC 21268.4) with hyaline, ampulliform to obclavate conidiogenous cells and hyaline, aseptate, smooth-walled, and cylindrical conidia, mostly with rounded ends (Zhang et al. 2023 a). The conidial L / W ratio of our isolates is also similar to that of C. castaneae (GUCC 21268.4) (L / W ratio = 3.4 vs. 3.2).</p><p>Based on phylogenetic and morphological species concepts, we identify our isolates as Colletotrichum castaneae . This study represents the first report of C. castaneae associated with leaf spots on Jasminum grandiflorum and establishes a new geographical record in Thailand.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7C62D879C8CF52A980D3234D95894913	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gomdola, Deecksha;Jeewon, Rajesh;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Tang, Xia;Wang, Yong;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Li	Gomdola, Deecksha, Jeewon, Rajesh, McKenzie, Eric H. C., Jayawardena, Ruvishika S., Al-Otibi, Fatimah, Tang, Xia, Wang, Yong, Hyde, Kevin D., Fu, Li (2025): Phylogenetic diversity of Colletotrichum species (Sordariomycetes, Glomerellales, Glomerellaceae) associated with plant diseases in Thailand. MycoKeys 119: 137-195, DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.119.152323
745EE575890A56F2AA01321A75D10542.text	745EE575890A56F2AA01321A75D10542.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Colletotrichum chrysophilum W. A. S. Vieira, W. G. Lima, M. P. S. Camara & V. P. Doyle	<div><p>Colletotrichum chrysophilum W. A. S. Vieira, W. G. Lima, M. P. S. Câmara &amp; V. P. Doyle, Mycologia 109 (6): 927 (2017)</p><p>Figs 2, 7</p><p>Description.</p><p>Associated with leaf spots of Terminalia sp. Leaf spots irregular or oval, pale brown, surrounded with a dark brown margin. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph on substrate: Conidiomata 70–120 × 60–120 µm (x ̄ = 94.5 × 96 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered, globose to subglobose, black, sometimes erumpent. Setae not observed. Conidiomatal wall 8.5–21 µm thick (x ̄ = 14.6 µm, n = 10), consisting of 3–5 layers of thick-walled pseudoparenchymatous cells of textura angularis, outer layers dark brown, inner layer pale brown to hyaline. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiophores hyaline, smooth-walled, aseptate, unbranched. Conidiogenous cells 16–22 × 3–4.5 µm (x ̄ = 18.9 × 3.6 µm, n = 10), hyaline, cylindrical to ampulliform, straight or flexuous, tapering towards the apex. Conidia 13–19 × 4.5–6 µm (x ̄ = 15.8 × 5.1 µm, n = 30; L / W ratio = 3.1), hyaline, cylindrical or oblong, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, mostly with rounded ends. Appressoria 7–12 × 7–13 µm (x ̄ = 10.9 × 10.5 µm, n = 5), hyaline, single-celled, globose to subglobose or irregular, smooth-walled.</p><p>Culture characteristics.</p><p>Colonies on PDA reaching approximately 45 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 ° C; mycelium greyish white, elevation flat or raised, aerial and filamentous with an entire or undulate margin.</p><p>Specimen examined.</p><p>Thailand • Chiang Rai Province, around the vicinity of Central Plaza, associated with leaf spots of Terminalia sp. ( Combretaceae), 11 Jul 2019, D. Gomdola DG 01 - SM (MFLU 25-0005), living culture MFLUCC 25-0006 .</p><p>GenBank accession numbers.</p><p>ITS = PV 263293; GAPDH = PV 290899; CHS 1 = PV 274250; ACT = PV 297876; TUB 2 = PV 295619; H 3 = PV 400141; and CAM = PV 299285.</p><p>Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles</p><p>(listed chronologically). Endophytic on Theobroma cacao and Genipa americana in Panama (Rojas et al. 2010) and Terpsichore taxifolia in Puerto Rico (Doyle et al. 2013).</p><p>Pathogenic; anthracnose on fruits of Musa sp. in Minas Gerais, Pernambuco, Santa Catarina, and São Paulo states in Brazil and Mexico (Vieira et al. 2017; Fuentes-Aragón et al. 2021), leaves of Anacardium humile and A. occidentale in Brazil (Veloso et al. 2018, 2021), fruits of Mangifera indica in Mexico (Fuentes-Aragón et al. 2020 a), fruits of Persea americana in Mexico (Fuentes-Aragón et al. 2020 b) and Brazil (Soares et al. 2021), leaves of Bauhinia forficata in Brazil (de Souza Junior et al. 2021), leaves of Manihot esculenta in Brazil (Machado et al. 2021), fruits of Carica papaya in Mexico (Pacheco-Esteva et al. 2022), and leaves of V accinium corymbosum in Brazil (Soares et al. 2022).</p><p>Bitter rot of Malus domestica in New York (Khodadadi et al. 2020) and Spain (Cabrefiga et al. 2022).</p><p>Preharvest decay of Malus domestica in Italy (Deltedesco and Oettl 2023).</p><p>Leaf spots on Euterpe oleracea and Malus domestica in Brazil and Uruguay (Astolfi et al. 2022; dos Santos et al. 2022; Andrello et al. 2024).</p><p>Associated with leaf spots of Terminalia sp. in Thailand (this study).</p><p>Notes.</p><p>Our isolate (MFLUCC 25-0006) grouped with Colletotrichum chrysophilum (URM 7368, A 20 _ F 13 _ 004, PP _ 212 b, PP _ 211 a, PP _ 209 c, PP _ 208 d, PP _ 210 d, and CBS 146410) with 100 % ML and 1.00 PP support (Fig. 2). Based on our phylogenetic analyses, C. chrysophilum is positioned within the C. gloeosporioides species complex (Figs 1, 2), congruent with the findings of Vieira et al. (2017). No nucleotide difference was observed in ITS (495 bp), GAPDH (219 bp), CHS 1 (267 bp), ACT (216 bp), TUB 2 (648 bp), and CAM (656 bp) regions between our isolate (MFLUCC 25-0006) and C. chrysophilum (URM 7368).</p><p>MFLUCC 25-0006 is morphologically similar to the ex-type of C. chrysophilum (URM 7368), producing hyaline, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, and cylindrical or oblong conidia with rounded ends (Vieira et al. 2017). The conidial L / W ratio of our isolate is similar to that of C. chrysophilum (URM 7368) (L / W ratio = 3.1 vs. 3.1).</p><p>Based on phylogenetic and morphological species concepts, we identify our isolate as Colletotrichum chrysophilum . This study represents the first report of C. chrysophilum associated with leaf spots on Terminalia sp. and establishes a new geographical record in Thailand.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/745EE575890A56F2AA01321A75D10542	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gomdola, Deecksha;Jeewon, Rajesh;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Tang, Xia;Wang, Yong;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Li	Gomdola, Deecksha, Jeewon, Rajesh, McKenzie, Eric H. C., Jayawardena, Ruvishika S., Al-Otibi, Fatimah, Tang, Xia, Wang, Yong, Hyde, Kevin D., Fu, Li (2025): Phylogenetic diversity of Colletotrichum species (Sordariomycetes, Glomerellales, Glomerellaceae) associated with plant diseases in Thailand. MycoKeys 119: 137-195, DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.119.152323
1F17A4CD5E565CEC8A250E7083FE0119.text	1F17A4CD5E565CEC8A250E7083FE0119.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Colletotrichum dendrobii Gomdola, K. D. Hyde & Jayaward. 2025	<div><p>Colletotrichum dendrobii Gomdola, K. D. Hyde &amp; Jayaward. sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 3, 11</p><p>Holotype.</p><p>MFLU 25-0018.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>The epithet refers to the host genus, Dendrobium, from which the species was isolated.</p><p>Description.</p><p>Associated with pod blight of Dendrobium sp. Pod blight elongated, pale brown to brown, surrounded with a dark brown margin. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph on substrate: Conidiomata 200–300 × 180–200 µm (x ̄ = 240 × 190 µm, n = 5), acervular, semi-immersed, scattered or gregarious, dark brown to black. Setae 30–200 µm long (x ̄ = 103 µm, n = 30), scattered or aggregated, straight or flexuous, smooth-walled, 1–5 - septate, brown to dark brown, base darker and apex paler, base 3.5–12.5 µm wide (x ̄ = 7.1 µm, n = 30), cylindrical or ampulliform, tapering to 1.5–5.5 µm (x ̄ = 3.1 µm, n = 30) at the apex. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiomata 200–1000 µm diam. (x ̄ = 450 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered or aggregated, globose to subglobose, black, exuding orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Conidiophores 13–30 µm long (x ̄ = 19.7 µm, n = 10), hyaline, branched or unbranched, smooth-walled. Conidiogenous cells 6–14 (– 20) × 2.5–4.5 µm (x ̄ = 8.3 × 3.5 µm, n = 10), hyaline, cylindrical to ampulliform, sometimes elongated, straight or flexuous. Conidia 11–19 × 4–6 µm (x ̄ = 16.7 × 4.8 µm, n = 30; L / W ratio = 3.5), hyaline, falcate or fusiform, sometimes cylindrical or irregular in shape, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, tapering towards both ends, base conical or rounded, apex acute. Appressoria 15–17 × 17–19 µm (x ̄ = 15.6 × 17.8 µm, n = 5), hyaline, single-celled, globose to subglobose, smooth-walled or verruculose.</p><p>Culture characteristics.</p><p>Colonies on PDA reaching approximately 70 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 ° C; mycelium initially greyish white, becoming dark grey to olivaceous brown with age; elevation flat, with an entire or undulate margin.</p><p>Specimen examined.</p><p>Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Omkoi District, Yiang Piang Subdistrict, associated with pod blight of Dendrobium sp. ( Orchidaceae), 16 Oct 2019, D. Gomdola DG 386 (MFLU 25-0018, holotype), ex-type MFLUCC 25-0019 .</p><p>Additional specimen examined.</p><p>Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Omkoi District, Yiang Piang Subdistrict, associated with pod blight of Dendrobium sp. ( Orchidaceae), 17 Oct 2019, D. Gomdola DG 387 (MFLU 25-0019), living culture MFLUCC 25-0020 .</p><p>GenBank accession numbers.</p><p>MFLUCC 25-0019; ITS = PV 263306; GAPDH = PV 290911; CHS 1 = PV 274262; ACT = PV 297887; H 3 = PV 400150; and CAM = PV 299292; MFLUCC 25-0020; ITS = PV 263307; and GAPDH = PV 290912.</p><p>Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles.</p><p>Associated with pod blight of Dendrobium sp. in Thailand (this study).</p><p>Notes.</p><p>Our isolates (MFLUCC 25-0019 and MFLUCC 25-0020) grouped with 100 % ML and 1.00 PP support. This sub-clade forms a sister clade to Colletotrichum verruculosum (IMI 45525) with strong support (100 % ML and 1.00 PP), indicating a close phylogenetic relationship (Fig. 3). In the phylogenetic analyses, our isolates are positioned within the C. spaethianum species complex (Figs 1, 3). The interspecies nucleotide sequence comparison between our isolates (MFLUCC 25-0019 and MFLUCC 25-0020) and C. verruculosum (IMI 45525) revealed the following divergence pattern: 1.3 % in ITS (7 / 519 bp), 3.1 % in GAPDH (6 / 196 bp), 1.9 % in ACT (4 / 211 bp), and 2.4 % in H 3 (9 / 371 bp) regions, but no nucleotide differences in CHS 1 (251 bp) between MFLUCC 25-0019 and C. verruculosum .</p><p>Morphologically, the conidiophores and conidiogenous cells of our isolates are hyaline, while those of C. verruculosum (IMI 45525) are pale brown. Additionally, conidiophores of our isolates are shorter than those of C. verruculosum (up to 30 µm vs. 110 µm long). Conidiogenous cells of our isolates are also smaller compared to those of C. verruculosum (6–14 (– 20) × 2.5–4.5 µm vs. 10–25 × 3–5 µm). Setae of our isolates are 1–5 - septate and 30–200 µm long, while those of C. verruculosum are 2–4 - septate and 70–160 µm long. The conidial L / W ratio of our isolates differs from that of C. verruculosum (L / W ratio = 3.5 vs. 4.6) (Damm et al. 2009).</p><p>Based on phylogenetic analyses and morphological data following recommendations proposed by Chethana et al. (2021) and Jayawardena et al. (2021 b), we establish our isolates as a new species, Colletotrichum dendrobii, associated with pod blight of Dendrobium sp. in Thailand.</p><p>The primary feature distinguishing Colletotrichum dendrobii from C. verruculosum (IMI 45525) is its variable and irregular conidial shape, along with their distinct phylogenetic lineages.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/1F17A4CD5E565CEC8A250E7083FE0119	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gomdola, Deecksha;Jeewon, Rajesh;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Tang, Xia;Wang, Yong;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Li	Gomdola, Deecksha, Jeewon, Rajesh, McKenzie, Eric H. C., Jayawardena, Ruvishika S., Al-Otibi, Fatimah, Tang, Xia, Wang, Yong, Hyde, Kevin D., Fu, Li (2025): Phylogenetic diversity of Colletotrichum species (Sordariomycetes, Glomerellales, Glomerellaceae) associated with plant diseases in Thailand. MycoKeys 119: 137-195, DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.119.152323
7F45328ED232535998B70768AA3C6D95.text	7F45328ED232535998B70768AA3C6D95.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Colletotrichum endophyticum Manamgoda, Udayanga, L. Cai & K. D. Hyde	<div><p>Colletotrichum endophyticum Manamgoda, Udayanga, L. Cai &amp; K. D. Hyde [as ‘ endophytica’], in Manamgoda et al. Fungal Diversity 61: 110 (2013)</p><p>Figs 2, 8</p><p>Description.</p><p>Associated with leaf spots, blight, and blotches. Leaf spots circular, brown, surrounded with a dark brown to black margin. Leaf blight and leaf blotches brown to dark brown. Sexual morph on substrate: Ascomata 100–150 × 100–120 µm (x ̄ = 122 × 112 µm, n = 10), solitary or aggregated, semi-immersed, globose to subglobose, black, creamy at the center, ostiolate. Setae not observed. Peridium 9.5–18.5 µm thick (x ̄ = 15.5 µm, n = 10), composed of 2–3 layers of thick-walled pseudoparenchymatous cells of textura angularis. Asci 54–88 × 12–21 µm (x ̄ = 68.6 × 17.3 µm, n = 10), operculate, unitunicate, cylindrical to truncate or obovoid, 6–8 - spored. Ascospores 15–17 × 4.5–6 µm (x ̄ = 15.5 × 5.1 µm, n = 20; L / W ratio = 3.0), uniseriate or biseriate, hyaline, cylindrical to subellipsoidal or oblong, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, mostly with rounded or obtuse ends. Asexual morph on substrate: Conidiomata 120–250 × 120–150 µm (x ̄ = 200 × 140 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered, globose to subglobose, black, sometimes erumpent, exuding creamy orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiomata 200–1000 µm diam. (x ̄ = 400 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered or segregated, globose to subglobose, exuding orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Conidiophores 20–25 µm long (x ̄ = 21.6 µm, n = 10), formed directly from mycelium, hyaline, cylindrical, branched, or unbranched. Conidiogenous cells 6–9 × 3–4.5 µm (x ̄ = 7 × 3.5 µm, n = 10), hyaline, cylindrical, or ampulliform, straight or flexuous, tapering towards the apex. Conidia 14–19 × 4–6 µm (x ̄ = 15.9 × 4.9 µm, n = 30; L / W ratio = 3.2), hyaline, cylindrical to ovoid, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, with rounded ends. Appressoria 8–11 × 7–8 µm (x ̄ = 8.5 × 7.5 µm, n = 5), hyaline, single-celled, irregular, smooth-walled or verruculose.</p><p>Culture characteristics.</p><p>Colonies on PDA reaching approximately 70 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 ° C; mycelium initially white, becoming greyish white to dark grey at the center with age, elevation flat or raised, aerial and dense, with an entire margin, producing orange conidial mass.</p><p>Specimens examined.</p><p>Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, around vicinity of Mushroom Research Center, associated with leaf spots of Schefflera sp. ( Araliaceae), 7 Jul 2021, D. Gomdola Div 15 - L 1 (MFLU 25-0006), living culture MFLUCC 25-0007 ; Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, around vicinity of Mushroom Research Center, associated with spots on dried dead leaves of Artocarpus heterophyllus ( Moraceae), 4 Apr 2023, D. Gomdola F 6 - A (MFLU 25-0007), living culture MFLUCC 25-0008 ; Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Doi Inthanon National Park, Highland Fisheries Unit, associated with leaf blight of Ficus auriculata ( Moraceae), 18 Oct 2021, D. Gomdola DGM 3 (L 1) - A (MFLU 25-0008, BHH 50481), living culture MFLUCC 25-0009 ; Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Mae On District, associated with leaf spots of Begonia luxurians ( Begoniaceae), 26 Jun 2020, D. Gomdola Div 10 (L 3) - T (MFLU 25-0009), living culture MFLUCC 25-0010 ; Thailand • Tak Province, associated with spots on dried dead leaves of Castanopsis sp. ( Fagaceae), 16 Oct 2019, D. Gomdola DG 153 - T 2 (MFLU 25-0010), living culture MFLUCC 25-0011 ; Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Mae On District, associated with leaf blotches of Cassia sp. ( Fabaceae), 25 Jun 2020, D. Gomdola Div 31 (T) - A (MFLU 25-0011), living culture MFLUCC 25-0012 .</p><p>GenBank accession numbers.</p><p>MFLUCC 25-0007; ITS = PV 263294; GAPDH = PV 290900; CHS 1 = PV 274251; ACT = PV 297877; and TUB 2 = PV 295620; MFLUCC 25-0008; ITS = PV 263295; GAPDH = PV 290901; CHS 1 = PV 274252; ACT = PV 297878; TUB 2 = PV 295621; H 3 = PV 400142; and CAM = PV 299286; MFLUCC 25-0009; ITS = PV 263296; GAPDH = PV 290902; CHS 1 = PV 274253; and ACT = PV 297879; MFLUCC 25-0010; ITS = PV 263297; GAPDH = PV 290903; CHS 1 = PV 274254; ACT = PV 297880; TUB 2 = PV 295622; H 3 = PV 400143; and CAM = PV 299287; MFLUCC 25-0011; ITS = PV 263298; GAPDH = PV 290904; CHS 1 = PV 274255; ACT = PV 297881; TUB 2 = PV 295623; H 3 = PV 400144; and CAM = PV 299288; and MFLUCC 25-0012; ITS = PV 263299; GAPDH = PV 290905; CHS 1 = PV 274256; ACT = PV 297882; TUB 2 = PV 295624; H 3 = PV 400145; and CAM = PV 299289.</p><p>Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles</p><p>(listed chronologically). Endophytic on leaves of Pennisetum purpureum in Thailand (Manamgoda et al. 2013) and fruits and leaves of Capsicum annuum in China (Diao et al. 2017).</p><p>Saprobic on an unknown wild fruit in Thailand (Udayanga et al. 2013).</p><p>Pathogenic; anthracnose on leaves of Camellia sinensis in China (Wang et al. 2016 a), leaves and berries of Coffea canephora var. robusta in China (Cao et al. 2019 b), fruits and leaves of Persea americana in Sri Lanka (Dissanayake et al. 2021) and Thailand (Armand and Jayawardena 2024), and leaves of Philodendron bipinnatifidum in China (Zhang et al. 2023 c).</p><p>Fruit lesion of Capsicum annuum in Thailand (de Silva et al. 2019).</p><p>Leaf spots of Acacia confusa and Bauhinia blakeana in China (Manawasinghe et al. 2022; Liang et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2023 b).</p><p>Associated with anthracnose of fruits and leaves of Mangifera indica (Li et al. 2019) and leaf spots of Artocarpus heterophyllus, Begonia luxurians, Castanopsis sp., and Schefflera sp., leaf blight of Ficus auriculata, and leaf blotches of Cassia sp. in Thailand (this study).</p><p>Notes.</p><p>Our isolates (MFLUCC 25-0007, MFLUCC 25-0008, MFLUCC 25-0009, MFLUCC 25-0010, MFLUCC 25-0011, and MFLUCC 25-0012) grouped with other strains of Colletotrichum endophyticum with 100 % ML and 1.00 PP support (Fig. 2). In our phylogenetic analyses, C. endophyticum is positioned within the C. gloeosporioides species complex (Figs 1, 2), consistent with findings of Manamgoda et al. (2013), Jayawardena et al. (2016 a), and Zhang et al. (2023 b). The intraspecies nucleotide differences between our isolates and the ex-type of C. endophyticum (MFLUCC 13-0418) are given in Table 1.</p><p>N / A: Not applicable.</p><p>Our isolates morphologically resemble the ex-type of C. endophyticum (MFLUCC 13-0418), having hyaline, cylindrical, or ampulliform conidiogenous cells and hyaline, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, and cylindrical to ovoid conidia with rounded ends. They also share similar colony characteristics, observed as white to greyish mycelium (Manamgoda et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2023 b). Additionally, the conidial L / W ratio of our isolates is similar to that of C. endophyticum (MFLUCC 13-0418) (L / W ratio = 3.2 vs. 3.4).</p><p>Based on phylogenetic and morphological species concepts, we identify our isolates as Colletotrichum endophyticum . This study represents six new host records for C. endophyticum associated with leaf spots of Begonia luxurians and Schefflera sp., spots on dried dead leaves of Castanopsis sp. and Artocarpus heterophyllus, leaf blight of Ficus auriculata, and leaf blotches of Cassia sp. in Thailand. Additionally, this is the first report for its sexual morph.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7F45328ED232535998B70768AA3C6D95	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gomdola, Deecksha;Jeewon, Rajesh;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Tang, Xia;Wang, Yong;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Li	Gomdola, Deecksha, Jeewon, Rajesh, McKenzie, Eric H. C., Jayawardena, Ruvishika S., Al-Otibi, Fatimah, Tang, Xia, Wang, Yong, Hyde, Kevin D., Fu, Li (2025): Phylogenetic diversity of Colletotrichum species (Sordariomycetes, Glomerellales, Glomerellaceae) associated with plant diseases in Thailand. MycoKeys 119: 137-195, DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.119.152323
04E751BED2AB529AA537A3B64F10ED19.text	04E751BED2AB529AA537A3B64F10ED19.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Colletotrichum fructicola Prihast., L. Cai & K. D. Hyde	<div><p>Colletotrichum fructicola Prihast., L. Cai &amp; K. D. Hyde, in Prihastuti et al. Fungal Diversity 39: 96 (2009)</p><p>Figs 2, 9</p><p>Description.</p><p>Associated with leaf spots, blight, and blotches. Leaf spots circular or irregular, pale brown to brown, surrounded with a dark brown margin. Leaf blight brown, surrounded with a dark brown margin. Leaf blotches reddish brown to dark brown. Sexual morph on substrate: Ascomata 75–150 × 80–150 µm (x ̄ = 95 × 98 µm, n = 5), solitary, semi-immersed, globose to subglobose, brown, ostiolate. Setae not observed. Sexual morph on PDA: Ascomata 100–200 × 100–190 µm (x ̄ = 131 × 123 µm, n = 5), solitary or aggregated, semi-immersed or superficial, globose to subglobose, black. Setae not observed. Peridium 8–38 µm thick (x ̄ = 19.1 µm, n = 10), composed of 3–4 layers of thick-walled pseudoparenchymatous cells of textura angularis. Asci 55–70 × 8–11 µm (x ̄ = 63 × 9.5 µm, n = 10), operculate, unitunicate, cylindrical to clavate or cymbiform, 6–8 - spored. Ascospores 13–23.5 × 4–6.5 µm (x ̄ = 17.9 × 5.1 µm, n = 25; L / W ratio = 3.5), uniseriate or biseriate, hyaline, subellipsoidal or oblong, reniform to falcate, somewhat fusiform, slightly curved, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, mostly with obtuse or acute ends. Asexual morph on substrate: Conidiomata 80–150 × 60–140 µm (x ̄ = 100 × 90 µm, n = 5), solitary, semi-immersed, globose to subglobose, brown, producing creamy to orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiomata 200–800 µm diam. (x ̄ = 350 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered or aggregated, globose to subglobose, exuding creamy to orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Conidiophores formed directly from mycelium, hyaline, cylindrical, branched, or unbranched. Conidiogenous cells 6.5–22 × 2–4 µm (x ̄ = 12.1 × 3 µm, n = 10), hyaline, cylindrical, or ampulliform, straight or flexuous, tapering towards the apex. Conidia 12–18 × 4.5–5.5 µm (x ̄ = 15.4 × 5 µm, n = 25; L / W ratio = 3.1), hyaline, cylindrical to ovoid, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, with rounded ends. Chlamydospores 6–7 × 6.5–8 µm (x ̄ = 6.3 × 7.2 µm, n = 5), globose to subglobose, pale brown. Appressoria Not observed.</p><p>Culture characteristics.</p><p>Colonies on PDA reaching approximately 80 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 ° C; mycelium initially white, becoming dark grey at the center when aged, elevation flat or raised, aerial and dense, with an entire margin.</p><p>Specimens examined.</p><p>Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Omkoi District, Yiang Piang Subdistrict, associated with leaf spots of Castanea sp. ( Fagaceae), 16 Oct 2019, D. Gomdola DG 367 - L 2 (MFLU 25-0012), living culture MFLUCC 25-0013; DG 367 (L 2) - A (MFLU 25-0013), living culture MFLUCC 25-0014; DG 367 (L 2) - B (MFLU 25-0014), living culture MFLUCC 25-0015 ; Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Doi Lo District, associated with leaf blight of Hedychium sp. ( Zingiberaceae), 15 Oct 2019, D. Gomdola DG 327 (MFLU 25-0015), living culture MFLUCC 25-0016 ; Thailand • Chiang Rai Province, around the vicinity of Central Plaza, associated with leaf blotches of Rhododendron sp. ( Ericaceae), 11 Jul 2019, D. Gomdola DG 03.1 (MFLU 25-0016), living culture MFLUCC 25-0017 .</p><p>GenBank accession numbers.</p><p>MFLUCC 25-0013; ITS = PV 263300; GAPDH = PV 290906; CHS 1 = PV 274257; ACT = PV 297883; and TUB 2 = PV 295625; MFLUCC 25-0014; ITS = PV 263301; GAPDH = PV 290907; CHS 1 = PV 274258; ACT = PV 297884; and H 3 = PV 549703; MFLUCC 25-0015; ITS = PV 263302; GAPDH = PV 290908; CHS 1 = PV 274259; ACT = PV 297885; and H 3 = PV 400146; MFLUCC 25-0016; ITS = PV 263303; GAPDH = PV 290909; CHS 1 = PV 274260; and H 3 = PV 400147; and CAM = PV 299290; and MFLUCC 25-0017; ITS = PV 263304; GAPDH = PV 290910; CHS 1 = PV 274261; ACT = PV 297886; TUB 2 = PV 295626; H 3 = PV 400148; and CAM = PV 299291.</p><p>Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles</p><p>(listed chronologically). Pathogenic on plants; Leaf spots of Ficus edulis in Germany and Limonium spp. in Israel (Weir et al. 2012); Pyrus pyrifolia (Zhang et al. 2015), Dalbergia hupeana (Zhou et al. 2022), Myrica rubra (Li et al. 2022 a), Ziziphus mauritiana (Shu et al. 2021), Zamia furfuracea (Manawasinghe et al. 2022), Liriodendron chinense × tulipifera (Wan et al. 2022), Magnolia wufengensis (Yin et al. 2022), Illicium verum (Zhao et al. 2022), Camellia sinensis, Curcuma phaeocaulis, Ilex chinensis, Ligustrum lucidum and Zingiber officinale (Zhang et al. 2023 a), and Celosia cristata, Cymbidium sinense and Dendrobium nobile in China (Zhang et al. 2023 b); Malus domestica in Uruguay (Casanova et al. 2017; Alaniz et al. 2019); and Nephrolepis cordifolia (Seifollahi et al. 2023) and Rhizophora apiculata in Thailand (Norphanphoun and Hyde 2023).</p><p>Leaf blotch of Aesculus chinensis in China (Sun et al. 2020) and brown blight of Camellia sinensis in Taiwan (Lin et al. 2023 a).</p><p>Shot-hole on leaves of Prunus sibirica in China (Han et al. 2023).</p><p>Brown sunken cladode spots of Nopalea cochenillifera in Brazil (Conforto et al. 2017).</p><p>Anthracnose of Dioscorea spp. in Nigeria (Weir et al. 2012); Pyrus bretschneideri, P. communis and P. pyrifolia in China (Weir et al. 2012; Li et al. 2013; Fu et al. 2019) and Pyrus pyrifolia × P. communis in Korea (Choi and Park 2021); Citrus spp. in China (Huang et al. 2013; Hu et al. 2019) and Iran (Arzanlou et al. 2015; Taheri et al. 2016); Hylocerous undatus and Ziziphus sp. in Thailand (Udayanga et al. 2013); Mangifera indica in Brazil (Lima et al. 2013, 2015), India (Sharma et al. 2013), Korea (Joa et al. 2016), China (Li et al. 2019), Mexico (Tovar-Pedraza et al. 2020), Egypt (Ismail and El-Ganainy 2022) and Taiwan (Wu et al. 2020; Lin et al. 2023 b); Rubus glaucus in Colombia (Afanador-Kafuri et al. 2014); Gleditsia caspica in Iran (Arzanlou et al. 2015); Prunus persica in USA (Hu et al. 2015), Korea (Lee et al. 2020) and China (Tan et al. 2022); Camellia sinensis in China (Liu et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2016 a; Lu et al. 2018; Shi et al. 2018) and Indonesia (Weir et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2015); Corchorus capsularis (Niu et al. 2016 a, 2016 b) and Fragaria × ananassa (Han et al. 2016; Jayawardena et al. 2016 b; He et al. 2019; Chen et al. 2020; Jian et al. 2021); Aucuba japonica in China (Li et al. 2016) and Korea (Hassan et al. 2023); Annona spp. in Brazil (Costa et al. 2016, 2019); Capsicum spp. in China (Liu et al. 2016; Diao et al. 2017), Thailand (de Silva et al. 2019) and Malaysia (Noor and Zakaria 2018); Nicotiana tabacum in China (Wang et al. 2016 b); Carica papaya in India (Saini et al. 2016), Mexico (Marquez-Zequera et al. 2018), Costa Rica (Ruiz-Campos et al. 2022) and Brazil (Vieira et al. 2022); Fatsia japonica in china (Shi et al. 2017); Malus domestica in Iran (Arzanlou et al. 2015) and Korea (Kim et al. 2018, 2020); Anacardium occidentale, A. othonianum and A. humile in Brazil (Veloso et al. 2018, 2021); Juglans regia (Wang et al. 2018; Li et al. 2023 a) and Pouteria campechiana in China (Yang et al. 2021); Diospyros kaki in Brazil (Carraro et al. 2019), Philippines (Evallo et al. 2022) and China (Zhang et al. 2023 d); Hevea brasiliensis in China (Cao et al. 2019 a) and Brazil (Santos de Oliveira et al. 2020); Coffea arabica in China (Cao et al. 2019 b) and Puerto Rico (Serrato-Diaz et al. 2020); Salvia greggii in Italy (Guarnaccia et al. 2019); Vitis labruscana and V. vinifera in Korea (Lim et al. 2020); Manihot esculenta in China (Liu et al. 2018) and Brazil (Bragança et al. 2016; Santos de Oliveira et al. 2020); Dendrobium officinale in China (Ma et al. 2019); Cattleya spp. and Phalaenopsis sp. in Brazil (Silva-Cabral et al. 2019); Areca catechu (Cao et al. 2020), Peucedanum praeruptorum (Ma et al. 2020), Crinum asiaticum (Qing et al. 2020), Camellia oleifera (Wang et al. 2020) and Paris polyphylla var. chinensis in China (Zhou et al. 2020); Ceanothus thyrsiflorus, Hydrangea paniculata, Cyclamen persicum and Liquidambar styraciflua in Italy (Guarnaccia et al. 2021); Persea americana in Colombia (Gañán et al. 2015), Israel (Sharma et al. 2017), Mexico (Fuentes-Aragón et al. 2018), New Zealand (Hofer et al. 2021) and Thailand (Armand and Jayawardena 2024); Allium cepa in Brazil (Henrique Lopes et al. 2021); Musa spp. (Huang et al. 2021 a), Eichhornia crassipes (Huang et al. 2021 b) and Eriobotrya japonica in China (Kuang et al. 2021); Camellia sinensis in Taiwan (Lin et al. 2021); Eucalyptus spp. in South Africa (Mangwende et al. 2021); Amomum villosum (Song et al. 2021), Rubus corchorifolius (Wu et al. 2021), Camellia chrysantha (Zhao et al. 2021), Cyclocarya paliurus (Zheng et al. 2021) and Camellia grijsii (= C. yuhsienensis) in China (Chen et al. 2022); Ziziphus jujuba (= Z. mauritiana) in Taiwan (Duan and Chen 2022); Atractylodes ovata in Korea (Hassan et al. 2022); Cunninghamia lanceolata (He et al. 2022), Prunus salicina (Huang et al. 2022 a) and Phoebe sheareri in China (Huang et al. 2022 b); Actinidia spp. in China and Japan (Huang et al. 2022 c; Poti et al. 2023); Carya illinoinensis (Chang et al. 2022), Macadamia integrifolia (Li et al. 2023 b), Luffa cylindrica (Li et al. 2022 b), Loropetalum chinense (Qiu et al. 2022), Prunus avium (Tang et al. 2022), Bletilla striata (Wang et al. 2022), Brassica parachinensis (Yu et al. 2022 a), Radermachera sinica (Yu et al. 2022 b), Arachis hypogaea (Gong et al. 2023), Osmanthus fragrans (He et al. 2023; Sui et al. 2024), Averrhoa carambola (Li and Zhang 2023), Carya cathayensis (Ma et al. 2023), Tetrapanax papyrifer (Tang et al. 2023) and Glycine max in China (Xu et al. 2023).</p><p>Fruit rot of Persea americana in Australia (Weir et al. 2012), Nephelium lappaceum in Puerto Rico (Serrato-Diaz et al. 2017), and Ziziphus mauritiana in China (Fan et al. 2022).</p><p>Ripe rot of Vitis spp. in Brazil (Echeverrigaray et al. 2020).</p><p>Bitter rot of Malus domestica in China (Fu et al. 2013), the USA (Weir et al. 2012; Munir et al. 2016), Brazil (Weir et al. 2012; Velho et al. 2015, 2018, 2019; Moreira et al. 2019), Uruguay (Alaniz et al. 2015; Velho et al. 2015), Japan (Yokosawa et al. 2017), Korea (Oo et al. 2018; Park et al. 2018), France (Nodet et al. 2019), and Italy (Wenneker et al. 2021).</p><p>Associated with spathe rot, spadix rot, and leaf spots of Anthurium andraeanum in Sri Lanka (Vithanage et al. 2021); leaf spots of Castanea sp., leaf blight of Hedychium sp., and leaf blotches of Rhododendron sp. in Thailand (this study).</p><p>Colletotrichum fructicola was also reported from Fragaria × ananassa in Canada and the USA (Weir et al. 2012) and Morus alba in China but showed no pathogenicity (Xue et al. 2019). Furthermore, it was reported to cause diseases on Vernicia montana, Cinnamomum camphora, Paulownia fortunei, and Schima superba in China (Sui et al. 2024).</p><p>Pathogenic on a nematode in China; infects horsehair worms ( Chordodes formosanus), a parasite of praying mantises (De Vivo et al. 2021).</p><p>Pathogenic on humans; causes Colletotrichum keratitis, a fungal infection of human eyes (Hung et al. 2020).</p><p>Endophytic on Tetragastris panamensis and Theobroma cacao in Panama (Weir et al. 2012), Cymbopogon citratus and Pennisetum purpureum in Thailand (Manamgoda et al. 2013), Licania tomentosa in Brazil (Lisboa et al. 2018), Dendrobium spp. in China (Ma et al. 2018), Coffea arabica in Thailand (Numponsak et al. 2018), and Magnolia candolli in China (De Silva et al. 2021).</p><p>Notes.</p><p>Our isolates (MFLUCC 25-0013, MFLUCC 25-0014, MFLUCC 25-0015, MFLUCC 25-0016, and MFLUCC 25-0017) grouped with other strains of Colletotrichum fructicola with 99 % ML and 1.00 PP support (Fig. 2). Colletotrichum fructicola is located in the C. gloeosporioides species complex (Figs 1, 2), consistent with findings of Prihastuti et al. (2009), Ma et al. (2018), Norphanphoun and Hyde (2023), and Zhang et al. (2023 b). No intraspecies nucleotide differences were observed between our isolates and the ex-type of C. fructicola (ICMP 18581) across the ITS, GAPDH, CHS 1, ACT, and TUB 2 regions. However, a sequence divergence of 0.7 % (5 / 731 bp) was observed in CAM between our isolate (MFLUCC 25-0017) and C. fructicola (ICMP 18581).</p><p>Our isolates morphologically resemble the ex-type of C. fructicola (ICMP 18581), having hyaline, smooth-walled, guttulate, and aseptate conidia and ascospores, with the conidia being cylindrical to ovoid with rounded ends and ascospores being oblong, reniform to falcate with obtuse or acute ends (Prihastuti et al. 2009). Notably, the ascospore and conidial lengths of our isolates vary slightly with other strains of C. fructicola . However, the L / W ratios of our isolates are similar to those of other C. fructicola strains. The ascospore L / W ratio of our isolates is 3.5, while those from other studies are ICMP 18581 = 3.6 (Prihastuti et al. 2009), MFLUCC 14-0087 = 3.4 (Ma et al. 2018), MFLUCC 17-1752 = 3.2 (Norphanphoun and Hyde 2023), and ZHKUCC 23-0829 = 3.7 (Zhang et al. 2023 b). The conidial L / W ratio of our isolates is 3.1, while those from other studies are ICMP 18581 = 3.2 (Prihastuti et al. 2009), MFLUCC 14-0087 = 2.9 (Ma et al. 2018), and MFLUCC 17-1752 = 2.6 (Norphanphoun and Hyde 2023).</p><p>Based on phylogenetic and morphological species concepts, we identify our isolates as Colletotrichum fructicola . This study represents three new host records for C. fructicola associated with leaf spots of Castanea sp., leaf blight of Hedychium sp., and leaf blotches of Rhododendron sp. in Thailand.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/04E751BED2AB529AA537A3B64F10ED19	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gomdola, Deecksha;Jeewon, Rajesh;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Tang, Xia;Wang, Yong;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Li	Gomdola, Deecksha, Jeewon, Rajesh, McKenzie, Eric H. C., Jayawardena, Ruvishika S., Al-Otibi, Fatimah, Tang, Xia, Wang, Yong, Hyde, Kevin D., Fu, Li (2025): Phylogenetic diversity of Colletotrichum species (Sordariomycetes, Glomerellales, Glomerellaceae) associated with plant diseases in Thailand. MycoKeys 119: 137-195, DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.119.152323
559EBA0169CD559281E2857889F78E10.text	559EBA0169CD559281E2857889F78E10.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Colletotrichum jiangxiense F. Liu & L. Cai	<div><p>Colletotrichum jiangxiense F. Liu &amp; L. Cai, in Liu et al. Persoonia 35: 82 (2015)</p><p>Figs 2, 10</p><p>Description.</p><p>Associated with leaf spots of Artocarpus sp. Leaf spots circular, oval, or irregular, pale brown to brown, surrounded with a dark brown margin. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph on substrate: Conidiomata 200–500 × 150–400 µm (x ̄ = 300 × 200 µm, n = 10), acervular, semi-immersed, scattered or gregarious, globose to subglobose, dark brown to black, erumpent, exuding creamy orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiomata 200–1000 µm diam. (x ̄ = 400 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered or gregarious, globose to subglobose, dark brown to black, exuding creamy orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Conidiophores hyaline, sometimes branched. Conidiogenous cells 12–19 × 2–5 µm (x ̄ = 14.9 × 3.2 µm, n = 10), hyaline, cylindrical to ampulliform, straight or flexuous. Conidia 14–21 × 4–6.5 µm (x ̄ = 16.5 × 5.2 µm, n = 30; L / W ratio = 3.2), hyaline, cylindrical to ellipsoidal, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, with rounded ends (sometimes tapering towards one end), forming conidial anastomosis tubes. Conidial anastomosis tubes 2–16 × 1–2 µm (x ̄ = 8.2 × 1.5 µm, n = 10), hyaline, smooth-walled, aseptate. Appressoria not observed.</p><p>Culture characteristics.</p><p>Colonies on PDA reaching approximately 55 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 ° C; mycelium white to grey, elevation flat, cottony, with an entire margin.</p><p>Specimen examined.</p><p>Thailand • Chiang Mai: Omkoi District, Yiang Piang Subdistrict, associated with leaf spots of Artocarpus sp. ( Moraceae), 16 Oct 2019, D. Gomdola DG 360 (MFLU 25-0017), living culture MFLUCC 25-0018 .</p><p>GenBank.</p><p>ITS = PV 263305; TUB 2 = PV 295627; H 3 = PV 400149.</p><p>Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles</p><p>(listed chronologically). Endophytic on Camellia sinensis in China (Liu et al. 2015; Jayawardena et al. 2016 a).</p><p>Pathogenic; brown lesions on leaves of Camellia sinensis in China (Liu et al. 2015).</p><p>Anthracnose on fruits of Persea americana in Mexico (Ayvar-Serna et al. 2020; Fuentes-Aragón et al. 2020 b).</p><p>Leaf spots of Fraxinus americana in China (Chang et al. 2023).</p><p>Associated with leaf spots of Artocarpus sp. in Thailand (this study).</p><p>Notes.</p><p>Our isolate (MFLUCC 25-0018) grouped with Colletotrichum jiangxiense (CGMCC 3.1736, 22 N 642, SYD- 9, and SYD- 4) with 90 % ML support (Fig. 2). However, this clade has low support for other species. Similar to the study conducted by Liu et al. (2015), this research shows that C. jiangxiense is located in the C. gloeosporioides species complex (Figs 1, 2). Nucleotide sequence comparisons between our isolate and C. jiangxiense (CGMCC 3.17363) showed no difference in the ITS (505 bp) and TUB 2 (667 bp) regions.</p><p>MFLUCC 25-0018 morphologically resembles the ex-type of C. jiangxiense (CGMCC 3.17363), having hyaline, aseptate, smooth-walled, and cylindrical conidia (Liu et al. 2015). The conidial L / W ratio of our isolate is close to that of C. jiangxiense (CGMCC 3.17363) (L / W ratio = 2.9 vs. 3.2).</p><p>Based on phylogenetic and morphological species concepts, we identify our isolate as Colletotrichum jiangxiense . This study represents the first report of C. jiangxiense associated with leaf spots on Artocarpus sp. and establishes a new geographical record in Thailand.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/559EBA0169CD559281E2857889F78E10	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gomdola, Deecksha;Jeewon, Rajesh;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Tang, Xia;Wang, Yong;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Li	Gomdola, Deecksha, Jeewon, Rajesh, McKenzie, Eric H. C., Jayawardena, Ruvishika S., Al-Otibi, Fatimah, Tang, Xia, Wang, Yong, Hyde, Kevin D., Fu, Li (2025): Phylogenetic diversity of Colletotrichum species (Sordariomycetes, Glomerellales, Glomerellaceae) associated with plant diseases in Thailand. MycoKeys 119: 137-195, DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.119.152323
D3AAFB3801A35897A148F4BAA978DD19.text	D3AAFB3801A35897A148F4BAA978DD19.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Colletotrichum musichiangmaiense Gomdola, K. D. Hyde & Jayaward. 2025	<div><p>Colletotrichum musichiangmaiense Gomdola, K. D. Hyde &amp; Jayaward. sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 1, 12</p><p>Holotype.</p><p>MFLU 25-0020.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>The compound epithet refers to the host genus, Musa, from which the species was isolated, and the location, Chiang Mai, where the fungus was collected.</p><p>Description.</p><p>Associated with leaf blight of Musa sp. Leaf blight elongated, pale brown to brown, surrounded with a dark brown margin. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiomata 200–1000 µm diam. (x ̄ = 450 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered or gregarious, globose to subglobose, dark brown to black, exuding creamy orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Conidiophores formed directly from mycelium, hyaline, aseptate, smooth-walled. Conidiogenous cells 9–16 × 2–6 µm (x ̄ = 13.2 × 4.2 µm, n = 10), hyaline, cylindrical to ampulliform or clavate, straight or flexuous, tapering towards the apex. Conidia 12–19 × 4.5–6 µm (x ̄ = 15.7 × 5.4 µm, n = 30; L / W ratio = 2.9), hyaline, cylindrical to clavate, straight or slightly flexuous, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, mostly with obtusely rounded ends (sometimes tapering towards one end). Appressoria not observed.</p><p>Culture characteristics.</p><p>Colonies on MEA reaching approximately 75 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 ° C; mycelium initially greyish white, becoming olivaceous brown with age, elevation flat, cottony, and fluffy, aerial and filamentous with an entire margin.</p><p>Specimen examined.</p><p>Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Omkoi District, Yiang Piang Subdistrict, associated with leaf blight of Musa sp. ( Musaceae), 16 Oct 2019, D. Gomdola DG 385-T 2 (MFLU 25-0020, holotype), ex-type MFLUCC 25-0021 .</p><p>GenBank accession numbers.</p><p>ITS = PV 263308; GAPDH = PV 290913; ACT = PV 297888; and TUB 2 = PV 295628.</p><p>Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles.</p><p>Associated with leaf blight of Musa sp. in Thailand (this study).</p><p>Notes.</p><p>Our isolate (MFLUCC 25-0021) matches the morphological species concept of Colletotrichum (Jayawardena et al. 2021 a). It forms a distinct lineage (99 % ML and 1.00 PP support; Fig. 1), separate from other Colletotrichum species, and does not group within any species complex. Based primarily on its phylogenetic placement and supported by morphological data, we designate our isolate as a new singleton species, Colletotrichum musichiangmaiense, associated with leaf blight of Musa sp. in Thailand.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D3AAFB3801A35897A148F4BAA978DD19	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gomdola, Deecksha;Jeewon, Rajesh;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Tang, Xia;Wang, Yong;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Li	Gomdola, Deecksha, Jeewon, Rajesh, McKenzie, Eric H. C., Jayawardena, Ruvishika S., Al-Otibi, Fatimah, Tang, Xia, Wang, Yong, Hyde, Kevin D., Fu, Li (2025): Phylogenetic diversity of Colletotrichum species (Sordariomycetes, Glomerellales, Glomerellaceae) associated with plant diseases in Thailand. MycoKeys 119: 137-195, DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.119.152323
6D5C937C345A5A7B9CBAB4C87DB7B043.text	6D5C937C345A5A7B9CBAB4C87DB7B043.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Colletotrichum schimae F. Liu, W. P. Wu & L. Cai	<div><p>Colletotrichum schimae F. Liu, W. P. Wu &amp; L. Cai, in Liu et al. Stud. Mycol. 101: 38 (2022)</p><p>Figs 4, 5</p><p>Description.</p><p>Associated with leaf spots of Jasminum sp. Leaf spots circular, pale brown to brown. Sexual morph: Not observed. Asexual morph on PDA: Conidiomata 200–1000 µm diam. (x ̄ = 400 µm, n = 10), semi-immersed, scattered or segregated, globose to subglobose, dark brown to black, exuding glistening yellowish to orange conidial mass. Setae not observed. Conidiophores formed directly from mycelium, hyaline, sometimes septate. Conidiogenous cells 16–45 × 2–4.5 µm (x ̄ = 32 × 3.5 µm, n = 10), formed terminally or laterally on hyphae, hyaline, cylindrical, solitary or branched, straight or flexuous, tapering towards the apex. Conidia 9–15 × 2.5–4 µm (x ̄ = 11.5 × 3.5 µm, n = 30; L / W ratio = 3.3), hyaline, cylindrical to fusiform, smooth-walled, guttulate, aseptate, mostly with acute ends. Appressoria not observed.</p><p>Culture characteristics.</p><p>Colonies on PDA reaching approximately 40 mm diam. after 7 d of incubation at 25 ° C; mycelium initially white, becoming yellowish to olivaceous brown with age; elevation flat, with an entire margin.</p><p>Specimens examined.</p><p>Thailand • Chiang Mai Province, Doi Inthanon National Park, Kew Mae Pan nature trail, associated with leaf spots of Jasminum sp. ( Oleaceae), 20 Oct 2021, D. Gomdola DGJas 1 (L 2) - A (MFLU 25-0001, BHH 50476), living culture MFLUCC 25-0002; DGJas 1 (L 3) - B (MFLU 25-0002, BHH 50478), living culture MFLUCC 25-0003 .</p><p>GenBank accession numbers.</p><p>MFLUCC 25-0002; ITS = PV 263289; GAPDH = PV 290895; CHS 1 = PV 274246; ACT = PV 297872; and TUB 2 = PV 295615; MFLUCC 25-0003; ITS = PV 263290; GAPDH = PV 290896; CHS 1 = PV 274247; ACT = PV 297873; and TUB 2 = PV 295616.</p><p>Known hosts, distributions, and lifestyles.</p><p>Endophytic on Schima sp. in China (Liu et al. 2022).</p><p>Pathogenic on leaves of Camellia sinensis var. assamica and Ilex chinensis in China (Sui et al. 2024).</p><p>Associated with leaf spots of Jasminum sp. in Thailand (this study).</p><p>Notes.</p><p>Our isolates (MFLUCC 25-0002 and MFLUCC 25-0003) grouped with Colletotrichum schimae (LC 13880, LC 13881, PC 9, CNUCC 324 C- 1-5 - 2, and CNUCC 528-2 - 2) with 97 % ML and 0.98 PP support (Fig. 4). In our phylogenetic analyses, C. schimae is positioned within the C. acutatum species complex (Figs 1, 4), consistent with the findings of Liu et al. (2022) and Sui et al. (2024). Nucleotide sequence comparisons between our two isolates and C. schimae (LC 13880) showed no differences in ITS (494 base pairs, bp), GAPDH (215 bp), and TUB 2 (490 bp) regions. However, a 0.8 % sequence divergence (2 / 245 bp) was observed in the CHS 1 gene between our isolates and the ex-type of C. schimae (LC 13880). For ACT, no differences were found between MFLUCC 25-0002 and C. schimae (LC 13880), but a 1.9 % divergence (4 / 208 bp) was observed between MFLUCC 25-0003 and C. schimae (LC 13880).</p><p>MFLUCC 25-0002 and MFLUCC 25-0003 morphologically resemble the ex-type of C. schimae (LC 13880) with hyaline, cylindrical conidiogenous cells and hyaline, smooth-walled, guttulate, and cylindrical to fusoid conidia with acute ends (Liu et al. 2022). Additionally, the conidial length-to-width ratio (L / W) of our isolates is similar to that of C. schimae (LC 13880) (L / W ratio = 3.3 vs. 3.3).</p><p>Based on phylogenetic and morphological species concepts, we identify our isolates as Colletotrichum schimae . This study represents the first report of C. schimae associated with leaf spots on Jasminum sp. and establishes a new geographical record in Thailand.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6D5C937C345A5A7B9CBAB4C87DB7B043	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Gomdola, Deecksha;Jeewon, Rajesh;McKenzie, Eric H. C.;Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.;Al-Otibi, Fatimah;Tang, Xia;Wang, Yong;Hyde, Kevin D.;Fu, Li	Gomdola, Deecksha, Jeewon, Rajesh, McKenzie, Eric H. C., Jayawardena, Ruvishika S., Al-Otibi, Fatimah, Tang, Xia, Wang, Yong, Hyde, Kevin D., Fu, Li (2025): Phylogenetic diversity of Colletotrichum species (Sordariomycetes, Glomerellales, Glomerellaceae) associated with plant diseases in Thailand. MycoKeys 119: 137-195, DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.119.152323
