taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
AC7187F8FFFEFFC9FF003459CC77C51D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14666671/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14666671	Figure 1. Rocinela murilloi Brusca and Iverson, 1985, female, 33.6 mm (ICML-EMU-9973), dorsal view.	Figure 1. Rocinela murilloi Brusca and Iverson, 1985, female, 33.6 mm (ICML-EMU-9973), dorsal view.	2018-12-06	Hendrickx, Michel E.		Zenodo	biologists	Hendrickx, Michel E.			
AC7187F8FFFEFFC9FF003459CC77C51D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14666675/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14666675	Figure 2. Rocinela murilloi Brusca and Iverson, 1985, female, 33.4 mm (ICML-EMU-9973), SEM photographs of pereopods. A, pereopod I; B, same,detail of propodus; C, same, detailof carpus and distalpart of merus; D,pereopod II; E, same,detail of propodus; F, same, detail of carpus and merus; G, pereopod III; H, same, detail of propodus; I, same, detail of carpus and merus.	Figure 2. Rocinela murilloi Brusca and Iverson, 1985, female, 33.4 mm (ICML-EMU-9973), SEM photographs of pereopods. A, pereopod I; B, same,detail of propodus; C, same, detailof carpus and distalpart of merus; D,pereopod II; E, same,detail of propodus; F, same, detail of carpus and merus; G, pereopod III; H, same, detail of propodus; I, same, detail of carpus and merus.	2018-12-06	Hendrickx, Michel E.		Zenodo	biologists	Hendrickx, Michel E.			
AC7187F8FFFEFFC9FF003459CC77C51D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14666677/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14666677	Figure 3. Rocinela murilloi Bruscaand Iverson, 1985, female, 33.6 mm (ICML-EMU-9973), mandible.A, mandibular palp; B, same, detail of distal two articles; C, mandible, general view; D, detail of molar process; E, detail of incisor; F, detail of lacina mobilis (see text for explanations).	Figure 3. Rocinela murilloi Bruscaand Iverson, 1985, female, 33.6 mm (ICML-EMU-9973), mandible.A, mandibular palp; B, same, detail of distal two articles; C, mandible, general view; D, detail of molar process; E, detail of incisor; F, detail of lacina mobilis (see text for explanations).	2018-12-06	Hendrickx, Michel E.		Zenodo	biologists	Hendrickx, Michel E.			
AC7187F8FFFEFFC9FF003459CC77C51D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/14666679/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14666679	Figure 4. Rocinela murilloi Brusca and Iverson, 1985. A, female, 33.4 mm; B, C, female, 33.6 mm (ICML-EMU-9973). A, ventral view of the frontal part; B, scales on second article of pereopod III; C, same, magnified.	Figure 4. Rocinela murilloi Brusca and Iverson, 1985. A, female, 33.4 mm; B, C, female, 33.6 mm (ICML-EMU-9973). A, ventral view of the frontal part; B, scales on second article of pereopod III; C, same, magnified.	2018-12-06	Hendrickx, Michel E.		Zenodo	biologists	Hendrickx, Michel E.			
