identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
666E87F46275FFB3FE538771C0D6F93F.text	666E87F46275FFB3FE538771C0D6F93F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Jakubirhynchia Tomasovych 2006	<div><p>Jakubirhynchia ? cf. fascicostata (Uhlig, 1880)</p><p>(Figs 2–4)</p><p>v *1880 Rhynchonella fascicostata n. f. – UHLIG, Sospirolo, p. 42, pl. V, figs 1–3.</p><p>v 2009 Jakubirhynchia ? cf. fascicostata (Uhlig, 1880) – VÖRÖS, Bakony, p. 63, pl. VIII, figs 12, 13 (cum syn.).</p><p>Material – Two moderately preserved specimens from Yakacik and Alacaatlı (Ankara area), Pliensbachian.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.92. 10.5 11.6 5.4 2.2 Remarks – This small and rather flat rhynchonellid species was thoroughly discussed recently by VÖRÖS (2009) and was placed tentatively to the genus Jakubirhynchia . The present material did not allow investigation of the internal features; therefore, this tentative generic attribution is accepted here. J. fascicostata is very easy to separate from other rhynchonellids because it is entirely and finely ribbed and the bifurcate ribs appear in bundles posteriorly. J. fascicostata is widespread in the Sinemurian and Pliensbachian of the Alpine-Mediterranean region and now it is recorded from northern Anatolia.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46275FFB3FE538771C0D6F93F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46274FFB2FDB28161C286FACF.text	666E87F46274FFB2FDB28161C286FACF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Prionorhynchia flabellum (Gemmellaro 1874)	<div><p>Prionorhynchia? flabellum (Gemmellaro, 1874)</p><p>(Figs 11–13)</p><p>v *1874 Rhynchonella flabellum, Menegh. – GEMMELLARO, Zona con Terebratula Aspasia, p. 83 (partim), pl. XI, figs 25–27, (non fig. 14).</p><p>v 2009 Prionorhynchia? flabellum (Gemmellaro, 1874) – VÖRÖS, Bakony, p. 68, pl. VIII, fig. 5 (cum syn.) .</p><p>Material – One rather well-preserved specimen from Yakacik (Ankara area), Pliensbachian.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.95. 13.4 14.0 7.1 – Remarks – This very characteristic rhynchonellid species was thoroughly discussed recently by the present author (VÖRÖS 2009) and was placed tentatively to the genus Prionorhynchia . The single specimen was not suitable to investigate the internal features; therefore, this tentative generic attribution is accepted here. P. flabellum can be distinguished from other species of Prionorhynchia by its laterally expanded subtrigonal, flabelliform outline and straight anterior commissure, with coarse zig-zag deflections. P. flabellum is a characteristic Pliensbachian species of the Alpine-Mediterranean region and this is its first record from northern Anatolia.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46274FFB2FDB28161C286FACF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46274FFB1FDD086DCC07DFB5B.text	666E87F46274FFB1FDD086DCC07DFB5B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cirpa fronto (Quenstedt 1871)	<div><p>Cirpa fronto (Quenstedt, 1871)</p><p>(Figs 5–7)</p><p>* 1871 [ Terebratula] triplicata fronto – QUENSTEDT, Petrefactenkunde Deutschlands, p. 71, pl. 37, figs 177–183.</p><p>1934 Rhynchonella variabilis Dav. var. fronto Quenst. – MOISSEIEV, Crimea and Caucasus, p. 43, 178, pl. II, figs 30–33.</p><p>1959 b Cirpa fronto (Quenstedt) . – AGER, British Rhynchonellidae, p. 53, text-figs 29–30, pl. V, figs 1–3.</p><p>1964 Cirpa fronto (Quenstedt, 1871) – SIBLÍK, Belanska Dolina, p. 168, text-fig. 3, pl. VIII, figs 4–6.</p><p>? 2003 Cirpa fronto (Quenstedt, 1871) – DULAI, Hettangian and Early Sinemurian, p. 17, text-fig. 4, pl. II, figs 1–3.</p><p>? 2010 Cirpa fronto (Quenstedt, 1871) – ALMÉRAS et al., Massif Armoricain, p. 28, text-fig. 18, pl. 2, fig. 2, pl. 5, fig. 4.</p><p>v 2011 Cirpa fronto (Quenstedt, 1871) – VÖRÖS &amp; KANDEMIR, Eastern Pontides, p. 353, fig. 4/1 (cum syn.).</p><p>2012 Cirpa fronto (Quenstedt 1871) – HÖFLINGER, Deutsch. Lias, p. 39 + fig. (unnumbered).</p><p>Material – One well preserved specimen from Kösrelik Kızığı (Ankara area), loose, from Sinemurian to Pliensbachian interval.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.93. 10.3 10.9 7.6 7.2 Remarks – This well-known and typical species of the genus Cirpa was recently figured and discussed by VÖRÖS &amp; KANDEMIR (2011) from Turkey. The above synonymy contains more items but far from being complete. The specimen figured by DULAI (2003, l.c.) does not show the diagnostic flattened frontal region of C. fronto, therefore, that identification is queried. The same holds true for the record by ALMÉRAS et al. (2010, l.c.) where the ribbing is too much coarse and the anterior view is missing. This Pliensbachian species is cosmopolitan in distribution, occurring in Northwest Europe, the Alpine-Mediterranean region, in the Atlas Mts, the Crimea and Turkey.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46274FFB1FDD086DCC07DFB5B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46277FFB0FD928790C780FDB4.text	666E87F46277FFB0FD928790C780FDB4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cirpa borissiaki (Moisseiev 1926)	<div><p>Cirpa borissiaki (Moisseiev, 1926)</p><p>(Figs 8–10)</p><p>*1926 Rhynchonella Borissiaki n. sp. – MOISSEIEV, Crimea, p. 971, 991, pl. XXVIII, figs 5–7.</p><p>1934 Rhynchonella borissiaki n. sp. – MOISSEIEV, Crimea and Caucasus, p. 45, 178 (pars), pl. II, figs 46–48, (non pl. III, figs 1–4).</p><p>1989 Cirpa borissiaki (Moisseiev, 1934) – TCHOUMATCHENCO, Kotel I, p. 6, text-figs 2, 3, pl. VI, figs 1–5.</p><p>v 2011 Cirpa cf. borissiaki (Moisseiev, 1934) – VÖRÖS &amp; KANDEMIR, Eastern Pontides, p. 354, fig. 4/2.</p><p>Material – One moderately preserved specimen from Alacaatlı (Ankara area), Pliensbachian.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.94. 10.8 12.6 8.6 6.2 Remarks – This is a small Cirpa with high oval outline and somewhat “cynocephalous” lateral view. The uniplicate anterior commissure shows four narrowly spaced, sharp zig-zag deflections. The ornamentation consists of 8 to 9 regular ribs, which are weak on the posterior part and became very sharp anteriorly. C. borissiaki differs from C. fronto by its very narrow uniplication and that it has no anterior flattening. VÖRÖS &amp; KANDEMIR (2011, l.c.) described this species and cited Moisseiev, 1934 as author. However, the correct date is 1926, since MOISSEIEV (1926, l.c.) properly described and figured the species borissiaki . So far, C. borissiaki was report- ed only from the Pliensbachian of the Pontian region (Crimea, Bulgaria, Turkey).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46277FFB0FD928790C780FDB4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46271FFB7FD3F8711C0FDFBA2.text	666E87F46271FFB7FD3F8711C0FDFBA2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cirpa alkayae Vörös 2014	<div><p>Cirpa alkayae sp. n.</p><p>(Figs 17–20, 21–22, 23)</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46271FFB7FD3F8711C0FDFBA2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46271FFB7FDC68295C754FBDB.text	666E87F46271FFB7FDC68295C754FBDB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cirpa kiragliae Ager 1959	<div><p>Cirpa kiragliae Ager, 1959</p><p>(Figs 14–16)</p><p>* 1959 a Cirpa kiragliae Ager, n. sp. – AGER, Turkey, p. 1019, text-fig. 2, pl. 128, fig. 2.</p><p>v 2014 Cirpa cf. kiragliae Ager, 1959 – VÖRÖS, Yakacik, p. 236, pl. I, fig. 6.</p><p>Material – Two moderately preserved specimens from Kösrelik Kızığı (Ankara area), loose, from Sinemurian to Pliensbachian interval.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.96. 14.4 15.3 9.4 6.4 Remarks – This is a rather coarsely costate species of the genus Cirpa, which differs from the typical species by its less convex valves and the absence or weak development of the anterior flattening. It has 11 ribs, five of which are in the uniplication. C. kiragliae was described by AGER (1959 a) from Yakacik (Turkey) and was recorded recently from the same locality by the present author (VÖRÖS 2014). Both authors discussed the relationships of C. kiragliae to other species of Cirpa . C. kiragliae seems to be endemic for Turkey (northern Anatolia).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46271FFB7FDC68295C754FBDB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46272FFB4FDD1812BC015F99C.text	666E87F46272FFB4FDD1812BC015F99C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Salgirella alberti (Oppel 1861)	<div><p>Salgirella alberti (Oppel, 1861)</p><p>(Figs 24–26)</p><p>* 1861 Rhynchonella Albertii Opp. – OPPEL, Brachiopoden des unteren Lias, p. 546, pl. XIII, fig. 4.</p><p>? 1869 Rhynchonella Alberti (Oppel) . – DUMORTIER, Bassin du Rhône, p. 332, pl. XLII, figs 14, 15.</p><p>v 1880 Rhynchonella Albertii Oppel. – UHLIG, Sospirolo, p. 32 (pars), pl. IV, fig. 1 (non fig. 2).</p><p>v 1889 Rhynchonella Alberti Opp. – GEYER, Hierlatz, p. 43, pl. V, figs 14–17 .</p><p>v 1895 Rhynchonella Alberti Opp. – FUCINI, Calcari bianchi, p. 172, pl. VII, fig. 1.</p><p>v 1900 Rhynchonella sp. aff. Alberti Opp. – BÖSE &amp; SCHLOSSER, Südtyrol, p. 193, pl. XVIII, fig. 1.</p><p>1934 Rhynchonella alberti Opp. – MOISSEIEV, Crimea and Caucasus, p. 46, 179, pl. III, figs 5–7.</p><p>1949 Rhynchonella Alberti Opp. var. tenuis n. var. – NUTSUBIDZE, Dzirula Massif, p. 49, pl. I, fig. 5.</p><p>? 2003 Salgirella cf. alberti (Oppel, 1861) – DULAI, Hettangian and Early Sinemurian, p. 29, pl. V, figs 7–10.</p><p>2008 Salgirella albertii (Oppel, 1861) – SIBLÍK, Mitterwand, p. 66, pl. 1, fig. 2.</p><p>Material – Three partly incomplete specimens from Beytepe (Ankara area), probably Pliensbachian.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.98. 26.3 33.5 14.6 7.9 Remarks – This is the type species of the genus Salgirella, and it was profusely and properly illustrated in the classical literature (OPPEL 1861, l.c.; GEYER 1889, l.c.) and even by MOISSEIEV (1934, l.c.). On this basis, our specimens were easily identified as S. alberti . The illustrations of S. alberti given by DUMORTIER (1869, l.c.) and DULAI (2003, l.c.) are not fully convincing; they probably represent some other species. The same holds true for one of the figures by UHLIG (1880, pl. IV, fig. 2); the present author examined this specimen in the collection of the Padova University, and concluded that it may belong rather to the genus Prionorhynchia .</p><p>The original spelling of the name albertii by OPPEL (l.c.) has been changed by GEYER (l.c.) to alberti; later this usage became prevailing, therefore, in accordance with the rules of the ICZN (ICZN 1999, Article 33.3), alberti is suggested as the correct spelling. S. alberti is a characteristic Sinemurian Alpine species, but it was recorded also from the Pliensbachian of other Mediterranean localities, the Crimea and Caucasus and now from Turkey.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46272FFB4FDD1812BC015F99C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46272FFABFDE58597C7A9FB7B.text	666E87F46272FFABFDE58597C7A9FB7B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Calcirhynchia hungarica (Bockh 1874)	<div><p>Calcirhynchia? hungarica (Böckh, 1874)</p><p>(Figs 27–29)</p><p>*1874 Rhynchonella Hungarica n. sp. – BÖCKH, Südlichen Theiles des Bakony, p. 160, pl. IV, figs 5, 6. 1884 Rhynchonella Hungarica Böckh. 1874 . – HAAS, Südtyrol und Venetien, p. 8, pl. II, fig. 12.</p><p>v 2009 Calcirhynchia? hungarica (Böckh, 1874) – VÖRÖS, Bakony, p. 78, pl. VIII, fig. 11 (cum syn.) . v 2014 Calcirhynchia hungarica (Böckh, 1874) – VÖRÖS, Yakacik, p. 236, pl. I, fig. 4 .</p><p>Material – Two moderately preserved specimens from Çalık (Gümüşhane area), loose from Lower Pliensbachian .</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.99. 12.1 14.0 9.2 4.8 Remarks – This rather globose, uniplicate and fully costate species was recently discussed by VÖRÖS (2009, 2014); that served the basis of the identification of our specimens.</p><p>“ R.” hungarica was described by BÖCKH (1874), who recognized its similarity to “ R.” plicatissima Quenstedt, 1852, but mentioned some differences between the two species. Subsequently, many authors regarded the two species as synonymous, with plicatissima as senior synonym. Recently, following the detailed revisions by TOMAŠOVÝCH (2006) and considering the data given by DULAI (1992, 2003), VÖRÖS (2009) restored Böckh’s species name hungarica for the forms which do not have planareas, but show fine riblets on their flat or gently convex lateral parts. The species hungarica is placed here to Calcirhynchia on the basis of serial sections of “ Calcirhynchia plicatissima ”, published by DULAI (1992, 2003). C. hungarica was widely recognized in the Sinemurian and Pliensbachian of the Alpine-Mediterranean region, but was recently recorded also in south Germany and Turkey.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46272FFABFDE58597C7A9FB7B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F4626DFFAAFE5086A1C7E9FA21.text	666E87F4626DFFAAFE5086A1C7E9FA21.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Homoeorhynchia maninensis (Siblik 1967)	<div><p>Homoeorhynchia cf. maninensis (Siblík, 1967)</p><p>(Figs 30–32)</p><p>* 1967 b Slovenirhynchia maninensis sp. n. – SIBLÍK, Domerian, p. 161, text-figs 4–9, pl. X, figs 1–4, pl. XI, figs 1–3.</p><p>1967 b Slovenirhynchia slovenica sp. n. – SIBLÍK, Domerian, p. 165, text-figs 10–12, pl. XII, figs 2–4.</p><p>? 1989 Homoeorhynchia almaensis (Moisseiev, 1934) – TCHOUMATCHENCO, Kotel I, p. 18 (pars), pl. II, figs 1–5 (non figs 6–9).</p><p>Material – One slightly damaged specimen from Beytepe (Ankara area), probably Pliensbachian.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch INV 2014.100. 13.1 15.4 8.1 7.9</p><p>Remarks – Our specimen has laterally expanded subquadrangular outline, weak deflections on its lateral commissures and biplicate anterior margin with two, sharp, equidimensional (i.e. perfectly symmetrical) deflections. The characters of its beak also support its attribution to the genus Homoeorhynchia .</p><p>The Turkish specimen is extremely similar to those figured by SIBLÍK (1967 b) on pl. X, fig. 1, as Slovenirhynchia maninensis and on pl. XII, fig. 3, as S. slovenica (the junior synonym of maninensis), therefore it was identified as maninensis . Siblík’s genus Slovenirhynchia was taken as synonymous with Homoeorhynchia (SUČIĆ-PROTIĆ 1969; AGER 1983). This was also accepted by SIBLÍK (1999, and pers. comm.), who considered maninensis as a representative of a morphological group within Homoeorhynchia, which was characterized by less cynocephalous (i.e. somewhat depressed) shape and symmetrically developed biplication. This “ maninensis -group” differs from the examples mentioned by AGER (1983) in the “marginal populations” of H. acuta (J. Sowerby, 1816), bearing two or three sharp deflexions in their anterior commissures. These specimens of the marginal population have always asymmetrically developed secondary riblets or weak deflexions on the sides of the high uniplication, as illustrated by MOISSEIEV (1934, pl. V, figs 10, 11), AGER (1959 a, text-fig. 1) and VÖRÖS (2014, pl. I, figs 7, 8) from Yakacik (Turkey) and VÖRÖS (2009, pl. IX, fig. 5) from Hungary.</p><p>Some other species, as possible members of the “ maninensis -group”, e.g. H. steinmanni (Haas &amp; Petri, 1882) and H. solitaria Siblík, 1999 were mentioned by SIBLÍK (1999), who discussed the differences between them as well. Further relat- ed forms were illustrated by SUČIĆ-PROTIĆ (1969) under the name Planirhynchia tantilla sp. nov. and by TCHOUMATCHENCO (1989) as Homoeorhynchia almaensis (Moisseiev, 1934) . Especially some specimens figured by TCHOUMATCHENCO (1989, pl. II, figs 1–5) seem very similar to H. maninensis by their highly and sharply biplicate anterior commissure. It has to be mentioned, that the original specimen of „ Rhynchonella ” almaensis figured by MOISSEIEV (1934, pl. III, figs 51–54) is not biplicate, but shows three zig-zag deflections of different altitude. H. maninensis was recorded from the Upper Pliensbachian of the West Carpathians and the Balkans (Kotel) and now from northern Anatolia.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F4626DFFAAFE5086A1C7E9FA21	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F4626CFFA9FD9485A5C731FC54.text	666E87F4626CFFA9FD9485A5C731FC54.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cuneirhynchia Buckman 1918	<div><p>Cuneirhynchia ? aff. palmata (Oppel, 1861)</p><p>(Figs 33–35)</p><p>Material – Three rather well-preserved specimens from Kösrelik Kızığı</p><p>(Ankara area), loose, from Sinemurian to Pliensbachian interval.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.101. 13.9 16.0 7.7 3.8 Remarks – This species probably belongs to the genus Cuneirhynchia on the basis of the planareas bordered by sharp ventral beak ridges; the slightly arched lateral commissures running close to the ventral beak ridges; the strongly deflected and nearly straight anterior commissure and the few (4 to 5), strong ribs, which appear only anteriorly. It stands close to C. palmata (Oppel, 1861), portrayed properly by OPPEL (1861, pl. XIII, fig. 2), UHLIG (1880, pl. V, fig. 4) and partly by GEYER (1889, pl. VI, figs 11, 13, 14), but differs from that by having fewer ribs (4-5, in contrast to 6-12 in C. palmata) and by undulate anterior commissure in contrast to the sharp deflections of C. palmata . Therefore, this species is described here as a separate taxon and only the affinity indicated.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F4626CFFA9FD9485A5C731FC54	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F4626FFFA8FDA78086C7EAFE2E.text	666E87F4626FFFA8FDA78086C7EAFE2E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cuneirhynchia retusifrons (Oppel 1861)	<div><p>Cuneirhynchia cf. retusifrons (Oppel, 1861)</p><p>(Figs 36–38)</p><p>* 1861 Rhynchonella retusifrons Opp. – OPPEL, Brachiopoden des unteren Lias, p. 544, pl. XII, fig. 5.</p><p>v 1874 Rhynchonella retusifrons, Opp. – GEMMELLARO, Zona con Terebratula Aspasia, p. 76, pl. XI, fig. 17.</p><p>v 1889 Rhynchonella retusifrons Opp. – GEYER, Hierlatz, p. 62 (pars), pl. VII, figs 8, 9, 11, 12 (non fig. 10).</p><p>1993 Cuneirhynchia retusifrons (Oppel, 1861) – SIBLÍK, Steinplatte, p. 968, pl. 1, fig. 10.</p><p>2003 Cuneirhynchia retusifrons (Oppel, 1861) – DULAI, Hettangian and Early Sinemurian, p. 37, pl. VI, figs 11–13.</p><p>v 2003 Cuneirhynchia retusifrons (Oppel, 1861) – VÖRÖS et al., Schafberg, p. 72, pl. VI, figs 38–40.</p><p>2012 Cuneirhynchia retusifrons (Oppel 1861) – HÖFLINGER, Deutsch. Lias, p. 63 + fig. (unnumbered).</p><p>2012 Cuneirhynchia cf. retusifrons (Oppel 1861) – HÖFLINGER, Deutsch. Lias, p. 64 + fig. (unnumbered).</p><p>Material – One partly broken specimen from Kösrelik Kızığı (Ankara area), loose, from Sinemurian to Pliensbachian interval.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.102. ~11.0 15.4 7.8 2.3 Remarks – This species of Cuneirhynchia differs from C. palmata (Oppel, 1861) by its low but marked, trapezoidal uniplication and more numerous but weak ribs. Our specimen has 13 ribs, 7 of which are in the uniplication. The anterior segment of the wide subtrigonal outline is truncated or even slightly concave. C. retusifrons was reported from the Sinemurian to the Pliensbachian. It is typically Alpine-Mediterranean in distribution, though HÖFLINGER (2012, l.c.) reported it from southern Germany with the notion that the extra-Alpine forms have more numerous ribs. The Turkish specimen is also densely ribbed.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F4626FFFA8FDA78086C7EAFE2E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F4626EFFAEFD91810CC141FC57.text	666E87F4626EFFAEFD91810CC141FC57.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cuneirhynchia dalmasi (Dumortier 1869)	<div><p>Cuneirhynchia dalmasi (Dumortier, 1869)</p><p>(Figs 39–41)</p><p>* 1869 Rhynchonella Dalmasi (Nov. spec.). – DUMORTIER, Bassin du Rhône, p. 331, pl. XLII, figs 3–5.</p><p>1962 Cuneirhynchia dalmasi (Dumortier) . – AGER, British Rhynchonellidae, p. 126, text-figs 77– 80, pl. XI, figs 4, 5.</p><p>2012 Cuneirhynchia dalmasi (Dumortier 1869) – HÖFLINGER, Deutsch. Lias, p. 62 + fig. (unnumbered).</p><p>v 2014 Cuneirhynchia dalmasi (Dumortier, 1869) – VÖRÖS, Yakacik, p. 238, pl. I, figs. 9, 10 (cum syn.) .</p><p>Material – Eleven variously preserved specimens from Yakacik and Kösrelik Kızığı (Ankara area) and Kelkit and Çalık (Gümüşhane area), from Sinemurian to Pliensbachian interval.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.103. 13.0 12.7 8.5 3.8 Remarks – This is the type species of the genus Cuneirhynchia with an outline close to an equilateral triangle, lateral commissures running near the extremely sharp ventral beak ridges. Further important characters are the very wide, low trapezoidal uniplication with sharp zig-zag deflections and the few, strong ribs, which appear only after a posterior smooth area. C. dalmasi is a Pliensbachian species cosmopolitan in distribution from the NW-European and Mediterranean regions to Turkey.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F4626EFFAEFD91810CC141FC57	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46268FFAEFDEE8085C7FFF8DB.text	666E87F46268FFAEFDEE8085C7FFF8DB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cuneirhynchia persinuata (Rau 1905)	<div><p>Cuneirhynchia cf. persinuata (Rau, 1905)</p><p>(Figs 42–44)</p><p>* 1905 Rhynchonella persinuata n. sp. – RAU, Lias Schwabens, p. 296, pl. XXII, figs 62–69.</p><p>1934 Rhynchonella persinuata Rau. – MOISSEIEV, Crimea and Caucasus, p. 55, 182, pl. IV, figs 1–8.</p><p>1964 Cuneirhynchia? persinuata (Rau, 1905) – SIBLÍK, Belanska Dolina, p. 175, text-fig. 6, pl. VIII, fig. 2.</p><p>1967 a Cuneirhynchia persinuata (Rau, 1905) – SIBLÍK, Slov. domer, p. 15, text-fig. 2, pl. I, fig. 2.</p><p>1989 Cuneirhynchia persinuata (Rau, 1905) – TCHOUMATCHENCO, Kotel I, p. 21, text-fig. 14, pl. III, figs 7–9.</p><p>2012 Cuneirhynchia persinuata (Rau 1905) – HÖFLINGER, Deutsch. Lias, p. 60 + figs. (unnumbered).</p><p>Material – One rather poorly preserved specimen from Çalık (Gümüşhane area), Lower Pliensbachian .</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.104. 10.6 11.3 7.7 4.9 Remarks – This species was well-documented by profuse illustrations by RAU (1905, l.c.) and HÖFLINGER (2012, l.c.) and on this basis, the identification of our specimen seems satisfactory. C. persinuata stands very close to the type species of the genus, C. dalmasi (Dumortier, 1869), but it is more convex, has more numerous ribs, weaker deflections in the uniplication, and its outline is more pentagonal in dorsal view, with somewhat concave anterior part. C. persinuata is a characteristic late Pliensbachian brachiopod of the NW-European (German) region but it was recorded also from the Pliensbachian of the West Carpathians, the Balkans (Kotel), the Crimea and now from the Pontides (Turkey).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46268FFAEFDEE8085C7FFF8DB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F4626BFFADFDB48145C72DFA5F.text	666E87F4626BFFADFDB48145C72DFA5F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Holcorhynchia meneghinii (Zittel 1869)	<div><p>Holcorhynchia? meneghinii (Zittel, 1869)</p><p>(Figs 45–47)</p><p>v * 1869 Rhynchonella Meneghinii Zitt. – ZITTEL, Central-Appenninen, p. 130, pl. XIV, figs 10, 11. v 2014 Holcorhynchia meneghinii (Zittel, 1869) – VÖRÖS, Yakacik, p. 238, text-fig. 2, pl. I, fig. 12</p><p>(cum syn.).</p><p>Material – One well preserved specimen from Yakacik (Ankara area), Pliensbachian.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.105. 11.1 11.3 6.5 1.8 Remarks – This is a rarely illustrated species, which was previously known only from the Central Appennines. Now it seems that H. meneghinii is rather frequent in Turkey: besides the present record, it was mentioned by VADÁSZ (1918) and documented in details by Vörös (2014). The author examined the original material of ZITTEL (1869) in the Bayerische Staatssammlung (München) and confirmed that the tiny “ Rhynchonella ” meneghinii is characterized by subtriangular outline, faint ribs which develop just near the anterior margin and a shallow dorsal sulcus; the anterior margin is only slightly sulcate. On these grounds our specimens from Yakacik can definitely be identified with Holcorhynchia meneghinii . AGER (1959 a) described a closely related species, H. yakacikensis Ager, 1959 from Yakacik, which is, however, significantly more elongated than meneghinii . H. meneghinii was recorded from the Pliensbachian of the Central Appennines and Turkey.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F4626BFFADFDB48145C72DFA5F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F4626BFFACFE57854DC7CAFB22.text	666E87F4626BFFACFE57854DC7CAFB22.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Gibbirhynchia curviceps (Quenstedt 1856)	<div><p>Gibbirhynchia cf. curviceps (Quenstedt, 1856)</p><p>(Figs 48–50)</p><p>* 1856 Terebratula curviceps – QUENSTEDT, Der Jura, p. 138, pl. 17, figs 13–15.</p><p>v 2009 Gibbirhynchia cf. curviceps (Quenstedt, 1858) – VÖRÖS, Bakony, p. 103, pl. XI, fig. 16 (cum syn.).</p><p>2010 Gibbirhynchia curviceps (Quenstedt, 1856) – ALMÉRAS et al, Massif Armoricain, p. 28, text-figs 8, 9, pl. 3, figs 1, 2, pl. 5, fig. 5.</p><p>v 2011 Gibbirhynchia cf. curviceps (Quenstedt, 1856) – VÖRÖS &amp; KANDEMIR, Eastern Pontides, p. 354, fig. 4/4.</p><p>2012 Gibbirhynchia curviceps (Quenstedt 1858) – HÖFLINGER, Deutsch. Lias, p. 86 + figs. (unnumbered).</p><p>2013 Gibbirhynchia curviceps (Quenstedt, 1858) – ALMÉRAS &amp; FAURÉ, Quercy, p. 45, pl.3, figs 15, 16.</p><p>2013 Gibbirhynchia curviceps (Quenstedt, 1856) – ALMÉRAS &amp; COUGNON, Principaux genres, p. 127, pl. 14, figs 9–11.</p><p>Material – Four variously preserved specimens from Beytepe and Alacaatlı (Ankara area), probably Pliensbachian.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.106. 12.4 14.7 6.7 5.2 Remarks – G. curviceps is perhaps the most frequently cited Pliensbachian rhynchonellid species in Europe. It was profusely illustrated by ALMÉRAS et al. (2010, l.c.), ALMÉRAS &amp; COUGNON (2013, l.c.) and HÖFLINGER (2012, l.c.) what served a firm basis for the identification of our specimens. G. curviceps was record- ed in a great number of localities in the Mediterranean region as well and when I was able to check personally in the respective collections, I recognized that G. curviceps became a comfortably used collective taxon among the numerous and partly vaguely defined species of the genus Gibbirhynchia . The date of publication of this species is inconsistently cited by different authors as 1856 or 1858. Quenstedt’s “Der Jura ” was published in several parts in different years; the species curviceps was described in the first part (p. 138) therefore the proper date is 1856. G. curviceps is a Pliensbachian species with cosmopolitan geographical distribution.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F4626BFFACFE57854DC7CAFB22	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F4626AFFA3FDED860BC770FDB5.text	666E87F4626AFFA3FDED860BC770FDB5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Gibbirhynchia muirwoodae Ager, Callospriferina 1954	<div><p>Gibbirhynchia cf. muirwoodae Ager, 1954</p><p>(Figs 51–53, 54–56)</p><p>* 1954 Gibbirhynchia muir-woodae sp. nov. – AGER, Gibbirhynchia, p. 40, pl. 1, figs 5, 6.</p><p>1962 Gibbirhynchia muirwoodae Ager. – AGER, British Rhynchonellidae, p. 99, text-fig. 60, pl. VIII, fig. 8.</p><p>Material – Six variously preserved specimens from Günüviran (Bilecik area), Yakacik, Kösrelik Kızığı and Alacaatlı (Ankara area), Upper Sinemurian to Pliensbachian. Measurements –</p><p>Remarks – This medium-sized Gibbirhynchia differs from G. curviceps (Quenstedt, 1856) in the lower degree of convexity of its valves and in some features what approach to the genus Tetrarhynchia, e.g. the shape of the fold and the costation. Considering the illustrations given by AGER (1954, l.c. and 1962, l.c.), our specimens seem to show the greatest similarity to G. muirwoodae from among the many species of Gibbirhynchia . G. muirwoodae was recorded from the upper Pliensbachian of the NW-European region and Turkey.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F4626AFFA3FDED860BC770FDB5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46265FFA2FDB180BEC7C8FD1B.text	666E87F46265FFA2FDB180BEC7C8FD1B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Callospiriferina tumida (Buch 1837)	<div><p>Callospiriferina cf. tumida (Buch, 1837)</p><p>(Figs 57–59)</p><p>* 1837 Spirifer tumidus . – BUCH, Über Delthyris, p. 53.</p><p>1971 Spiriferina tumida var. typica var. nov. – SUČIĆ-PROTIĆ, Mid. Lias. Brach. Yugosl. Carpatho-Balkanids (II), p. 51, pl. XVIII, figs 1–5, pl. XXXVI, fig. 2.</p><p>1977 Callospiriferina tumida (v. Buch) – ROUSSELLE, Spiriférines, p. 157, text-figs 1-B, 3, 4, pl. 1, fig. 2.</p><p>2000 Callospiriferina tumida (v. Buch, 1836) – ALMÉRAS &amp; FAURÉ, Pyrénées, p. 206, text-fig. 38, pl. 22, figs 7, 8.</p><p>2003 Callospiriferina tumida (Buch, 1836) – DULAI, Hettangian and Early Sinemurian, p. 66, pl. XII, figs 1–4.</p><p>2010 Callospiriferina tumida (V. Buch, 1836) – ALMÉRAS et al., Massif Armoricain, p. 65, pl. 4, fig. 15, pl. 5, fig. 3.</p><p>2012 Callospiriferina tumida (v. Buch 1837) – HÖFLINGER,Deutsch.Lias,p. 93 +fig.(unnumbered).</p><p>2013 Callospiriferina tumida (V. Buch, 1834) – ALMÉRAS &amp; COUGNON, Principaux genres, p. 21, pl. 1, figs 1, 2.</p><p>Material – Two specimens; one fragmentary specimen from Günüviran (Bilecik area), and a disarticulated ventral valve from Alacaatlı (Ankara area), loose from Upper Sinemurian to Pliensbachian interval .</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.109. ~20.0 24.2 16.2 ~4.0 Remarks – This is the type species of the genus Callospiriferina, defined by ROUSSELLE (1977) as comprising the weakly ribbed spiriferinides with well-demarcated, smooth dorsal fold and ventral sulcus. Despite that its ventral beak is broken away, our specimens, especially the figured one, corresponds very well to the above description and to the figures cited in the synonymy.</p><p>In the original description of C. tumida (under the name “ Spirifer tumidus ”) BUCH (1837, p. 53) made reference to “ Spirifer pinguis Ziethen, 1830 ”, and introduced the name tumidus for substituting the name pinguis, which was preoccupied for a Carboniferous species of “ Spirifer ”. Nevertheless, the name pinguis remained popular for a long time, and many authors used it, until SUČIĆ-PROTIĆ (1971, p. 50) then ROUSSELLE (1977) cleared up this confusion. C. tumida is a Sinemurian to Pliensbachian species of widespread distribution from the NW- European and Alpine-Mediterranean regions to North Africa and Turkey.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46265FFA2FDB180BEC7C8FD1B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46264FFA1FDF381D1C700FD51.text	666E87F46264FFA1FDF381D1C700FD51.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Callospiriferina haueri (Suess 1854)	<div><p>Callospiriferina haueri (Suess, 1854)</p><p>(Figs 60, 61–63)</p><p>* 1854 Spirifer Haueri Suess. – SUESS, Kössener Schichten, p. 52, pl. II, fig. 6.</p><p>v 1886 Sp. Haueri Suess 1854 – ROTHPLETZ, Vilser-Alpen, p. 162, pl. XIII, figs 1–5.</p><p>? 1934 Spiriferina ex gr. tumida Corroy. – MOISSEIEV, Crimea and Caucasus, p. 28, 175, pl. I, figs 26–28.</p><p>1934 Spiriferina haueri Suess. – MOISSEIEV, Crimea and Caucasus, p. 28, 175, pl. I, figs 29, 30, pl. II, figs 1–4.</p><p>1971 Spiriferina tumida (Buch) var. haueri Corroy – SUČIĆ-PROTIĆ, Mid. Lias. Brach. Yugosl. Carpatho-Balkanids (II), p. 52, pl. XIX, figs 1–4.</p><p>1990 Spiriferina haueri Suess, 1854 – TCHOUMATCHENCO, Brach. jur. Kotel II., p. 4 (pars), text-fig. 1, pl. I, figs 1, 5, 7 (? non figs 2, 4, 6), pl. II, figs 3–5 (? non figs 1, 2).</p><p>1999 Callospiriferina haueri (Suess 1854) – SIBLÍK, Northern Calcareous Alps, p. 429, pl. 3, figs 2, 3.</p><p>2012 Callospiriferina haueri (Suess 1854) – HÖFLINGER, Deutsch. Lias, p. 95 + fig. (unnumbered).</p><p>Material – Three fragmentary specimens from Beytepe and Alacaatlı (Ankara area), probably Pliensbachian.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>Remarks – This is a large Callospiriferina with laterally expanded oval to subtrigonal outline. The hinge margin is straight and very wide, its length attains the whole width of the shell, and protrudes from the outline. The valves are almost equally convex. The dorsal valve is more inflated posteriorly. The ventral umbo is wide, very high and strongly apsacline. The interarea is a little wider than high and almost flat. The dorsal umbo is well developed. The lateral commissures are poorly preserved. The anterior commissure is highly uniplicate forming a narrow, rather sharp, unbroken arch. The linguiform extension is distinctly protracted anterodorsally. The lateral flanks of the valves are covered by 7 to 9 strong but blunt ribs; the central fold and sulcus are smooth.</p><p>C. haueri is well-documented by classical authors (SUESS 1854; ROTHPLETZ 1886) and our specimens from the Ankara area fit well to these illustrations. The specimen illustrated by MOISSEIEV (1934, pl. I, figs 26–28) as Spiriferina ex gr. tumida Corroy seems rather similar to C. haueri . From among the numerous specimens illustrated by TCHOUMATCHENCO (1990) as haueri, some items are queried in the above synonymy because their figures are of very poor quality, or they are almost smooth. This species has a cosmopolitan distribution from the Alpine region to Turkey and from the Hettangian to the Pliensbachian.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46264FFA1FDF381D1C700FD51	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46267FFA1FD9A804BC184F8FF.text	666E87F46267FFA1FD9A804BC184F8FF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Liospiriferina alpina (Oppel 1861)	<div><p>Liospiriferina alpina (Oppel, 1861)</p><p>(Figs 64–66, 67–69)</p><p>* 1861 Spiriferina alpina Opp. – OPPEL, Brachiopoden des unteren Lias, p. 541, pl. XI, fig. 5.</p><p>v 2009 Liospiriferina alpina (Oppel, 1861) – VÖRÖS, Bakony, p. 112, pl. XII, fig. 2 (cum syn.).</p><p>non 2013 Liospiriferina alpina (Oppel, 1861) – ALMÉRAS &amp; COUGNON, Principaux genres, p. 30, pl. 2, fig. 6.</p><p>v 2014 Liospiriferina alpina (Oppel, 1861) – VÖRÖS, Yakacik, p. 240, pl. I, fig. 14.</p><p>Material – Nine partly incomplete specimens from Günüviran (Bilecik area), Alacaatlı (Ankara area), Gökdere and Çalık (Gümüşhane area), Upper Sinemurian and Pliensbachian .</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>Remarks – This frequently cited and figured Alpine species of the genus Liospiriferina was recently discussed in detail by VÖRÖS (2009). L. alpina is easily identified on the basis of its circular outline, the simple, smooth biconvex valves, the straight anterior commissure and the elevated ventral beak with rather high, trigonal interarea. ALMÉRAS &amp; COUGNON (2013, p. 30) suggested that the item L. alpina by VÖRÖS (2009) should be referred to L. hartmanni (Zieten, 1830) . However, this can not be accepted, because L. hartmanni clearly differs from L. alpina by having transversely elongated outline, uniplicate anterior commissure and massive dorsal umbo. The specimen figured by ALMÉRAS &amp; COUGNON (2013, l.c.) does not correspond to the typical L. alpina because its anterior commissure is not straight but definitely uniplicate. L. alpina is a typical Sinemurian to Pliensbachian Alpine-Mediterranean species but it was rarely recorded also from NW-Europe, Algeria and Turkey.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46267FFA1FD9A804BC184F8FF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46266FFA0FDC98295C103FC3F.text	666E87F46266FFA0FDC98295C103FC3F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Liospiriferina obtusa (Oppel 1861)	<div><p>Liospiriferina obtusa (Oppel, 1861)</p><p>(Figs 70–72)</p><p>* 1861 Sp. obtusa – OPPEL, Brachiopoden des unteren Lias, p. 542, pl. XI, fig. 8.</p><p>v 2009 Liospiriferina obtusa (Oppel, 1861) – VÖRÖS, Bakony, p. 115, pl. XIII, fig. 1 (cum syn.).</p><p>Material – One moderately preserved specimen from Gökdere (Gümüşhane area), Lower Pliensbachian .</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.114. 15.3 14.6 12.0 6.9 Remarks – L. obtusa is closely related to L. alpina but it is markedly uniplicate and its ventral beak is strongly apsacline and slightly incurved. The relationship of L. obtusa to other species of Liospiriferina was discussed recently by VÖRÖS (2009). L. obtusa is a typical Sinemurian to Pliensbachian Alpine-Mediterranean species but it was rarely recorded also from the southern regions of NW-Europe, the Crimea and Turkey.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46266FFA0FDC98295C103FC3F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46266FFA7FD928622C7DDFD51.text	666E87F46266FFA7FD928622C7DDFD51.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lobothyris punctata (J. Sowerby 1813)	<div><p>Lobothyris cf. punctata (J. Sowerby, 1813)</p><p>(Figs 73–75)</p><p>* 1813 Terebratula punctata . – J. SOWERBY, Mineral Conchology I, p. 46, pl. XV, fig. 4.</p><p>1926 Terebratula punctata Sow. – MOISSEIEV, Crimea, p. 975, pl. XXVIII, figs 23–25.</p><p>v 2009 Lobothyris cf. punctata (J. Sowerby, 1813) – VÖRÖS, Bakony, p. 137, pl. XV, fig. 6 (cum syn.).</p><p>v 2011 Lobothyris punctata (Sowerby, 1813) – VÖRÖS &amp; KANDEMIR, Eastern Pontides, p. 357, figs 5/1–2 .</p><p>v 2014 Lobothyris cf. punctata (J. Sowerby, 1813) – VÖRÖS, Yakacik, p. 242, pl. II, fig. 3.</p><p>Material – Five specimens of various state of preservation from Alacaatlı (Ankara area), Elma Tepe and Çalık (Gümüşhane area), Upper Sinemurian to Pliensbachian. Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.115. 21.2 15.8 9.3 –</p><p>Remarks – This widespread Early Jurassic terebratulid species was very frequently recorded and figured in the classical and recent literature. In spite of its very simple morphology: elongated oval outline, somewhat flattened dorsal valve, rectimarginate commissures, and relatively small, depressed ventral umbo, L. punctata is easy to recognize and the identification of our specimens seems justified. L. punctata is a Pliensbachian species of cosmopolitan distribution.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46266FFA7FD928622C7DDFD51	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46261FFA6FD938016C1F7FB29.text	666E87F46261FFA6FD938016C1F7FB29.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Linguithyris aspasia (Zittel 1869)	<div><p>Linguithyris aspasia (Zittel, 1869)</p><p>(Figs 76, 77–79, 80–82, 83–85)</p><p>v * 1869 Terebratula Aspasia. Menegh. – ZITTEL, Central-Appenninen, p. 126, pl. XIV, figs 1–4.</p><p>v 2009 Linguithyris aspasia (Zittel, 1869) – VÖRÖS, Bakony, p. 169, text-figs 96–104, pl. XXIV, figs 5–13, pl. XXV, figs 1–11, pl. XXVI, figs 1–6 (cum syn.).</p><p>2012 Linguithyris aspasia (Meneghini 1853) – HÖFLINGER, Deutsch. Lias, p. 144 + fig. (unnumbered).</p><p>2013 Linguithyris aspasia (Zittel, 1869) – BAEZA-CARRATALÁ, Subbetic, p. 84, fig. 5/10.</p><p>v 2014 Linguithyris aspasia (Zittel, 1869) – VÖRÖS, Yakacik, p. 242, pl. II, fig. 5.</p><p>Material – Four specimens of various state of preservation from Günüviran (Bilecik area) and Hasanoğlan (Ankara area), loose from Upper Sinemurian to Pliensbachian interval .</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>Remarks – This species was profusely illustrated and exhaustively discussed by VÖRÖS (2009) and the identification of our specimens is beyond doubt. It is worth mentioning that all Turkish specimens, including those figured by AGER (1959 a, 1991) and VÖRÖS (2014) represent the isometric variants of L. aspasia; they did not reach the bilobate growth stage. Nevertheless, they definitely belong to L. aspasia, what is further supported by the internal features illustrated by AGER (1991, fig. 2) and by the present paper (Fig. 76). Both series of cross sections show the reduced hinge plates, the indistinct crural bases, triangular in cross section and the simple loop with arched transverse band. One specimen figured by TCHOUMATCHENCO (1990, pl. VII, fig. 3) from Kotel, may represent a juvenile L. aspasia . This is a long-ranging species, from the Sinemurian to the early Toarcian.</p><p>Its frequent occurrence in the lower Pliensbachian of the Mediterranean region initiated the classical term “Strati con T.aspasia ”. Later on, the geographical distribution of this species was proved to extending to a wider area, including North Africa and Turkey.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46261FFA6FD938016C1F7FB29	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46260FFA5FDE986D4C7EFFC3A.text	666E87F46260FFA5FDE986D4C7EFFC3A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Zeilleria waterhousi (Davidson 1851)	<div><p>Zeilleria cf. waterhousi (Davidson, 1851)</p><p>(Figs 86–88)</p><p>* 1851 Terebratula Waterhousii, Dav. – DAVIDSON, Oolitic and Liasic, p. 31, pl. V, figs 12, 13.</p><p>1869 Terebratula Waterhousi (Davidson) . – DUMORTIER, Bassin du Rhône, p. 324, pl. XLI, figs 11, 12. 2012 Zeilleria waterhousi (Davidson 1851) – HÖFLINGER, Deutsch. Lias, p. 169 + fig. (unnumbered). v 2014 Zeilleria cf. waterhousi (Davidson, 1851) – VÖRÖS, Yakacik, p. 243, pl. II, fig. 6.</p><p>Material – One moderately preserved specimen from Çalık (Gümüşhane area), Lower Pliensbachian .</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.120. 14.6 11.0 5.8 – Remarks – In the identification of this species the comprehensive synthesis on zeilleriids by DELANCE (1974) and the monographs by ALMÉRAS &amp; FAURÉ (2000, 2013) have been taken into account. In the original concept by DAVIDSON (1851) T. waterhousi was characterized by gently sulcate anterior commissure. Later, by synonymizing the species subdigona (Oppel, 1853) the forms with straight anterior commissure were also included (DELANCE 1974; ALMÉRAS &amp; FAURÉ 2013). Our specimen shows gently strangulate, straight anterior commissure, therefore stands closer to the “ subdigona ”- type.</p><p>ANTOSHTCHENKO (1970) ranged this species into the genus Keratothyris Tuluweit, 1965, but it was not accepted by DELANCE (1974) and later French authors, and this latter opinion is followed by the present author. Z. waterhousi was most frequently recorded in northwest Europe, but occurs also in the Crimea, the Balkans and Turkey; therefore, it seems to be cosmopolitan in distribution.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46260FFA5FDE986D4C7EFFC3A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46263FFA4FD9F8730C1DEFCE1.text	666E87F46263FFA4FD9F8730C1DEFCE1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Zeilleria lycetti (Davidson 1851) sensu Ager	<div><p>Zeilleria cf. lycetti (Davidson, 1851)</p><p>(Figs 89–91)</p><p>* 1851 Terebratula Lycetii, Dav. – DAVIDSON, Oolitic and Liasic, p. 44, pl. VII, figs 17–19 (non figs 20–22).</p><p>non 1878 Waldheimia Lycetti, Dav. – DAVIDSON, Supplement, p. 175, pl. XXIV, figs 30, 31.</p><p>1974 Zeilleria lycetti (Davidson 1851, sensu Buckman 1904) – DELANCE, Zeilleridés, p. 158, pl. 2, figs 11, 12.</p><p>? 1994 Zeilleria (Zeilleria) lycetti (Davidson, 1851) – TCHOUMATCHENCO, Ouarsenis, p. 55, pl. V, figs 4, 5.</p><p>2010 Zeilleria lycetti (Davidson, 1851 sensu Buckman, 1904) – ALMÉRAS et al., Massif Armoricain, p. 58, text-fig. 18, pl. 4, figs 3, 4.</p><p>v 2011 Zeilleria cf. lycetti (Davidson, 1851) sensu Ager – VÖRÖS &amp; KANDEMIR, Eastern Pontides, p. 358, fig. 5/5 (cum syn.).</p><p>v 2014 Zeilleria cf. lycetti (Davidson, 1851) – VÖRÖS, Yakacik, p. 244, pl. II, fig. 7 .</p><p>Material – Two partly incomplete specimens from Kösrelik Kızığı (Ankara area), loose from Upper Sinemurian to Pliensbachian interval .</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.121. 17.7 14.5 8.3 – Remarks – This species of Zeilleria has very simple morphology. Its outline is slightly drop-shaped, oval; the valves are moderately and nearly equally convex. The beak is highly elevated and suberect, with sharp beak ridges. The commissures are rectimarginate. Dental plates are visible in specimens with broken umbo. By these morphological features, our specimens were easily identified as Z. cf. lycetti .</p><p>Z. lycetti is frequently cited and illustrated but its correct interpretation bears some uncertainty. DAVIDSON (1851, pl. VII, figs 17–22) figured several different specimens under the name lycetti . BUCKMAN (1904) revised the material and designated the specimen on fig. 17 by DAVIDSON (1851) as the type specimen of “ Ornithella Lycetti ”. DELANCE (1974) and later French authors (ALMÉRAS et al. 2010; ALMÉRAS &amp; FAURÉ 2013) followed this practice. On the other hand, AGER (1959 a) used a wider interpretation and included the figs 17–19 of DAVIDSON (1851) as representing the species Z. lycetti . This was accepted by VÖRÖS &amp; KANDEMIR (2011) and VÖRÖS (2014) and is followed here as well. Z. lycetti is widespread in the Pliensbachian in Northwest Europe but was also recorded in Turkey and perhaps in North Africa.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46263FFA4FD9F8730C1DEFCE1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46262FF9BFD80804BC1E2FD7E.text	666E87F46262FF9BFD80804BC1E2FD7E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Zeilleria subnumismalis (Davidson 1851)	<div><p>Zeilleria cf. subnumismalis (Davidson, 1851)</p><p>(Figs 92–94)</p><p>* 1851 Terebratula numismalis, Lamarck var. subnumismalis – DAVIDSON, Oolitic and Liasic, p. 36, 38, pl. V, fig. 10.</p><p>1869 Terebratula subnumismalis (Davidson) . – DUMORTIER, Bassin du Rhône, p. 326, pl. XLI, figs 8–9 (? 10).</p><p>1878 Waldheimia sub-numismalis, Dav. – DAVIDSON, Supplement, p. 62, pl. XXI, figs 1–7.</p><p>1885 Waldheimia (Zeilleria) subnumismalis, Dav. – PARONA, Saltrio e Arzo, p. 257, pl. V, figs 8–14.</p><p>1893 Waldheimia subnumismalis, Dav. – PARONA, Revisione Gozzano, p. 52, pl. I, fig. 26.</p><p>? 1926 Waldheimia subnumismalis Opp. – MOISSEIEV, Crimea, p. 980, pl. XXVIII, figs 34–36.</p><p>? 1934 Zeilleria subnumismalis Dav. E. Desl. – MOISSEIEV, Crimea and Caucasus, p. 131, 198, pl. XVII, figs 27–33.</p><p>1966 Zeilleria subnumismalis (Davidson, 1852) – SIBLÍK, Ramenon. Kostelec. bradla, p. 140, pl. II, fig. 1.</p><p>1974 Zeilleria (Zeilleria) subnumismalis (Davidson 1851) – DELANCE, Zeilleridés, p. 202, pl. 3, figs 16, 17.</p><p>1990 Zeilleria (Zeilleria) subnumismalis (Davidson 1851) – TCHOUMATCHENCO, Brach. jur. Kotel II, p. 24, text-fig. 14, pl. X, figs 6–11, pl. XI, figs 1–4.</p><p>2012 Zeilleria subnumismalis (Davidson 1851) – HÖFLINGER, Deutsch. Lias, p. 166 + fig. (unnumbered).</p><p>Material – Five partly incomplete specimens from Beytepe (Ankara area), probably Pliensbachian.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.122. 34.5 31.6 21.4 –</p><p>Remarks – This species of Zeilleria was profusely and well illustrated by some classical authors (DAVIDSON 1878, l.c.; PARONA 1885, l.c.) and was exhaustively revised by DELANCE (1974). On this basis the identification of our specimens seems justified. Z. subnumismalis is a rather large, conservative form, with subcircular outline, moderate convexity and straight commissures. Some items of the above synonymy do not conform to these basic features, e.g. the specimen figured by MOISSEIEV (1926, l.c.) is too elongated; another item by MOISSEIEV (1934, l.c.) is too small; their attribution to Z. subnumismalis is questionable. This is a Pliensbachian species of the NW-European region but it was recorded also from the Alpine-Carpathian region, the Balkans (Kotel), perhaps from the Crimea and now from Turkey.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46262FF9BFD80804BC1E2FD7E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F4625DFF9BFD9F81FCC7DFFA16.text	666E87F4625DFF9BFD9F81FCC7DFFA16.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Zeilleria mutabilis (Oppel 1861)	<div><p>Zeilleria cf. mutabilis (Oppel, 1861)</p><p>(Figs 95–97)</p><p>* 1861 Terebratula mutabilis Opp. ( Waldheimia .) – OPPEL, Brachiopoden des unteren Lias, p. 538, pl. X, fig. 7.</p><p>v 2009 Zeilleria mutabilis (Oppel, 1861) – VÖRÖS, Bakony, p. 183, text-figs 110, 111, pl. XXVIII, figs 5, 6 (cum syn.).</p><p>v 2014 Zeilleria cf. mutabilis (Oppel, 1861) – VÖRÖS, Yakacik, p. 244, pl. II, fig. 8 .</p><p>Material – Five rather well-preserved specimens from Kösrelik Kızığı (Ankara area), loose from Upper Sinemurian to Pliensbachian interval .</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.123. 14.2 13.7 6.7 – Remarks – This species is one of the most frequently illustrated and best known Alpine Early Jurassic zeilleriid. Recently VÖRÖS (2009) gave a detailed external and internal morphological description and discussion of Z. mutabilis . Externally, it is easy to recognize by its very simple but constant morphology (subpentagonal outline, moderately flat valves, straight commissures, erect to slightly incurved beak), and on the basis of these features, the identification of our specimens seems to be justified. Z. mutabilis is frequent in the Sinemurian and Pliensbachian of the Alpine-Mediterranean region, but occurs also in North Africa, the Balkans and Turkey; therefore, it tends to be cosmopolitan in distribution.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F4625DFF9BFD9F81FCC7DFFA16	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F4625DFF9AFDA3851DC721FB8E.text	666E87F4625DFF9AFDA3851DC721FB8E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Aulacothyris resupinata (J. Sowerby 1816)	<div><p>Aulacothyris resupinata (J. Sowerby, 1816)</p><p>(Figs 98–100)</p><p>* 1816 Terebratula resupinata . – J. SOWERBY, Mineral Conchology II, p. 116, pl. CL, figs. 3, 4.</p><p>1851 Terebratula resupinata, Sow. – DAVIDSON, Oolitic and Liasic, p. 31, pl. IV, figs 1–5.</p><p>1959 a Aulacothyris cf. A. resupinata (J. Sowerby) – AGER, Turkey, p. 1025, pl. 129, fig. 5.</p><p>1974 Aulacothyris resupinata (Sowerby 1816) – DELANCE, Zeilleridés, p. 317, pl. 6, figs 14–26.</p><p>1975 Aulacothyris resupinata (Sowerby 1818) – COMAS-RENGIFO &amp; GOY, Ribarredonda, p. 320, pl. 2, figs 5, 6.</p><p>1990 Aulacothyris resupinata (J. Sowerby, 1816) – TCHOUMATCHENCO, Brach. jur. Kotel II, p. 35, text-figs 21, 22, pl. XI, figs 6–10.</p><p>2010 Aulacothyris resupinata (Sowerby, 1818) – ALMÉRAS et al., Massif Armoricain, p. 62, text-fig. 21.</p><p>v 2014 Aulacothyris resupinata (J. Sowerby, 1816) – VÖRÖS, Yakacik, p. 245, pl. II, fig. 10.</p><p>Material – One rather well-preserved specimen from Günüviran (Bilecik area), loose from Upper Sinemurian to Lower Pliensbachian interval .</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.124. 11.3 10.3 4.9 2.7 Remarks – A. resupinata is a frequently illustrated and well-known European zeilleriid species and it was thoroughly discussed by DELANCE(1974) and ALMÉRAS et al. (2010). On the basis of its elongated oval outline, erect beak with well-developed beak ridges and the shallow but long dorsal sulcus, starting very posteriorly, our specimen was easy to identify with this species. A. resupinata differs from A. anatolica (Vadász, 1913) by its narrower sulcus and by its oval outline, in contrast to the subpentagonal outline of A. anatolica, where the greatest width is near the anterior end of the shell. A. resupinata occurs frequently in the Pliensbachian of the NW-European region, but was recorded also in North Africa, the Balkans (Kotel) and Turkey; therefore, it tends to be cosmopolitan in distribution.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F4625DFF9AFDA3851DC721FB8E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F4625CFF98FDFA87ACC675FCE1.text	666E87F4625CFF98FDFA87ACC675FCE1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Aulacothyris anatolica (Vadasz 1913)	<div><p>Aulacothyris anatolica (Vadász, 1913)</p><p>(Figs 101–103, 104–106)</p><p>v * 1913 a Waldheimia anatolica nov. f. – VADÁSZ, Kisázsia, p. 61, text-fig. 5.</p><p>v 1913 b Waldheimia anatolica nov. f. – VADÁSZ, Kleinasien, p. 69, text-fig. 6.</p><p>? 1926 Waldheimia (Aulacothyris) salgirensis n. sp. – MOISSEIEV, Crimea, p. 983, 993, pl. XXVIII, figs 40–42.</p><p>? 1934 Aulacothyris salgirensis Mois. – MOISSEIEV, Crimea and Caucasus, p. 153, 202, pl. XIX, figs 22–25.</p><p>1959 a Aulacothyris anatolica (Vadasz) – AGER, Turkey, p. 1025, pl. 129, fig. 1.</p><p>v 2014 Aulacothyris anatolica (Vadász, 1913) – VÖRÖS, Yakacik, p. 245, text-fig. 3, pl. II, fig. 11.</p><p>Material – Seven moderately preserved specimens from Günüviran (Bilecik area), Kösrelik Kızığı (Ankara area) and Çalık (Gümüşhane area), loose from Upper Sinemurian to Pliensbachian interval .</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>Remarks – This typical species of the genus Aulacothyris was first described by VADÁSZ (1913 a, b) from Yakacik (Turkey), and a detailed revision of the same topotypical material was given recently by VÖRÖS (2014), including the demonstration of the internal morphology of A. anatolica . It was also shown that A. salgirensis introduced by MOISSEIEV (1926), was very similar externally and probably conspecific with A. anatolica . This view was strongly supported by the serial sections of A. salgirensis published by ANTOSHTCHENKO (1970, fig. 4), which are particularly similar to those of A. anatolica . Our species differs from A. resupinata (J. Sowerby, 1816) by its broad and shallow sulcus and that its greatest width is attained near the anterior end of the shell. From this point of view, A. anatolica is somewhat similar to A.? ballinensis (Haas, 1912; see in VÖRÖS 2009), but it is more elongated and its sulcus starts more posteriorly and is significantly deeper. A. anatolica was known only from Yakacik (Turkey), but in the light of the new data presented here, it seems to be widespread in other parts of northern Anatolia.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F4625CFF98FDFA87ACC675FCE1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F4625EFF98FD908081C18FF982.text	666E87F4625EFF98FD908081C18FF982.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Bakonyithyris apenninica (Zittel 1869)	<div><p>Bakonyithyris cf. apenninica (Zittel, 1869)</p><p>(Figs 107–109)</p><p>* 1869 Terebratula (Waldheimia) Apenninica. Zitt. – ZITTEL, Central-Appenninen, p. 127, pl. XIV, fig. 9.</p><p>v 2009 Bakonyithyris apenninica (Zittel, 1869) – VÖRÖS, Bakony, p. 198, text-figs 121–124, pl. XXIX, figs 5–8 (cum syn.).</p><p>Material – Two poorly preserved specimens from Alacaatlı (Ankara area), probably Pliensbachian.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.127. 11.4 11.7 7.5 3.2 Remarks – This species is very closely related to B. pedemontana (Parona, 1893), the type species of Bakonyithyris and was recently revised and discussed in detail by VÖRÖS (2009). One of our specimens, illustrated in figs. 107–109, is a typical representative of B. apenninica, whereas the anterior commissure of the other specimen tends to be somewhat trapezoidal and reminding in this respect to B. meneghinii (Parona, 1880) . B. apenninica is a dominantly Pliensbachian species, typical for the Alpine-Mediterranean region but it was recorded also from North Africa and now from Turkey.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F4625EFF98FD908081C18FF982	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F4625EFF9FFDCC85E1C746FBCE.text	666E87F4625EFF9FFDCC85E1C746FBCE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cincta numismalis (Lamarck 1819)	<div><p>Cincta numismalis (Lamarck, 1819)</p><p>(Figs 110–112)</p><p>* 1819 Terebratula numismalis . – LAMARCK, Histoire naturelle, p. 249, no. 17.</p><p>1926 Waldheimia numismalis Lam. – MOISSEIEV, Crimea, p. 980, pl. XXVIII, figs 31–33.</p><p>v 2011 Cincta numismalis (Lamarck, 1819) – VÖRÖS &amp; KANDEMIR, Eastern Pontides, p. 358, fig. 5/6 (cum syn.) .</p><p>Material – One moderately preserved specimen from Alacaatlı (Ankara area), probably Pliensbachian.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.128. 12.1 12.4 5.1 – Remarks – This species has a very characteristic, flat, lenticular shape and a marked ventral umbo, bordered by sharp beak ridges. C. numismalis was discussed in details by DELANCE (1974) and ALMÉRAS &amp; FAURÉ (2000), who illustrated the rather wide morphological variability and cleared up its generic attribution. On this basis, the identification of our specimen, though it is rather small, seems to be confirmed. C. numismalis is a characteristic NW-European species, long-ranging from the late Sinemurian to the Pliensbachian. It was described and illustrated from the Balkans (Kotel) and Crimea and another localities of Turkey by AGER (1959 a) and VÖRÖS &amp; KANDEMIR (2011).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F4625EFF9FFDCC85E1C746FBCE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
666E87F46259FF9EFE7B87A2C754FCC5.text	666E87F46259FF9EFE7B87A2C754FCC5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Fimbriothyris guerangeri (Deslongchamps 1856)	<div><p>Fimbriothyris cf. guerangeri (Deslongchamps, 1856)</p><p>(Figs 113–115)</p><p>1856 Terebratula (Waldheimia) guerangeri, E.-D. – DESLONGCHAMPS, Précigné, p. 304, pl. XVII,</p><p>fig. 1. 1871 Terebratula Guerangeri – QUENSTEDT, Petrefactenkunde, p. 301, pl. 45, fig. 92. 1907 Waldheimia tranzensis n. f. – DAL PIAZ, Sospirolo, p. 62, text-fig. 4. 1942 Zeilleria Guerangeri E. Desl. sp. – DUBAR, Multiplissées, p. 51, text-fig. 15, pl. II, fig. 16. 1974 Fimbriothyris guerangeri (Deslongchamps 1856) – DELANCE, Zeilleridés, p. 279, pl. 6, figs</p><p>1–5.</p><p>Material – One poorly preserved specimen from Yakacık, Pliensbachian.</p><p>Measurements –</p><p>L W T Ch</p><p>INV 2014.129. 13.4 11.7 6.1 – Remarks – Our specimen is rather poorly preserved, but by its oval outline, straight commissures, the beak characters, the presence of the median septum and first of all the radial multiplication render it the closest to F. guerangeri . The original figures by DESLONGCHAMPS (1856, l.c.) portray a specimen with rather angular anterior part trapezoidal in outline and the illustration of “ Waldheimia tranzensis ” by DAL PIAZ (1907, l.c.) also corresponds to this. Later authors (DUBAR 1942; DELANCE 1974), on the basis of larger material, expanded the concept of this species and included forms with more oval outlines.</p><p>Similar forms, where, in contrast to the typical F. guerangeri, the marginal multiplication appeared only at the anterior margin, have been described and illustrated by TCHOUMATCHENCO (1990, p. 33, pl. V, fig. 1, pl. VII, fig. 7) from Kotel as Fimbriothyris sp. indet., and by VÖRÖS &amp; KANDEMIR (2011, p. 359, figs 5/7, 5/8) from the Eastern Pontides as Fimbriothyris sp., aff. guerangeri . These probably represent another, closely allied species of Fimbriothyris . F.guerangeri is a Pliensbachian species, rather cosmopolitan in geographical distribution, from the NW-European and the Mediterranean regions to Turkey.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/666E87F46259FF9EFE7B87A2C754FCC5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Vörös, A.	Vörös, A. (2014): Early Jurassic brachiopods from diverse localities of northern Anatolia (Turkey). Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 31: 7-49, DOI: 10.17111/FragmPalHung.2014.31.7, URL: https://doi.org/10.17111/fragmpalhung.2014.31.7
