identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
296E192BFFC9657619C2FC2BFB6DF9F3.text	296E192BFFC9657619C2FC2BFB6DF9F3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pseudotruncatella R. H. Perera, Camporesi, Maharachch. & K. D. Hyde 2018	<div><p>Pseudotruncatella R.H. Perera, Camporesi, Maharachch. &amp; K.D. Hyde, gen. nov.</p> <p>Index fungorum number: IF553932, Facesoffungi number: FoF: 03838</p> <p>Etymology:— Morphologically resembling the genus Truncatella, but phylogenetically distinct.</p> <p>Saprobic on dead branches of Cytisus and Helichrysum species. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Conidiomata acervular to pycnidioid, scattered or gregarious, rounded to oval in outline, unilocular, immersed to semi-immersed, epidermal to sub-epidermal in origin. Peridium comprising hyaline to pale brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis. Conidiophores arising from basal and lateral cavity-surface of conidioma, cylindrical, septate, branched, sometimes unbranched or reduced to conidiogenous cells, smooth, hyaline. Conidiogenous cells cylindrical, occasionally ampulliform, holoblastic, phialidic, annellidic, with a few percurrent proliferations, indeterminate, integrated, hyaline, smooth, thick-walled, with several percurrent proliferations. Conidia fusiform to clavate, straight, 3-septate, not constricted at septa, with dark brown median cells and hyaline apical and basal cells, bearing 3 apical appendages; narrowly obconic and truncate base, guttulate, thick-walled, smooth-walled; 2-median cells large, thick-walled, smooth-walled, upper median cell subcylindrical to conic, lower median cell narrowly obconic; apical cell conic, smooth, thick-walled; apical appendages simple, tubular, hyaline, smooth-walled.</p> <p>Type:— Pseudotruncatella arezzoensis R.H. Perera, Camporesi, Maharachch. &amp; K.D. Hyde</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/296E192BFFC9657619C2FC2BFB6DF9F3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Perera, Rekhani H.;Maharachchikumbura, Sajeewa S. N.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Bhat, D. Jayarama;Camporesi, Erio;Jones, E. B. Gareth;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Al-Sadi, Abdullah M.;Saichana, Natsaran;Liu, Jian-Kui;Liu, Zuo-Yi	Perera, Rekhani H., Maharachchikumbura, Sajeewa S. N., Hyde, Kevin D., Bhat, D. Jayarama, Camporesi, Erio, Jones, E. B. Gareth, Senanayake, Indunil C., Al-Sadi, Abdullah M., Saichana, Natsaran, Liu, Jian-Kui, Liu, Zuo-Yi (2018): An appendage-bearing coelomycete Pseudotruncatella arezzoensis gen. and sp. nov. (Amphisphaeriales genera incertae sedis) from Italy, with notes on Monochaetinula. Phytotaxa 338 (2): 177-188, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.338.2.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.2.2
296E192BFFC9657419C2F9C7FBCFFA77.text	296E192BFFC9657419C2F9C7FBCFFA77.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pseudotruncatella arezzoensis R. H. Perera, Camporesi, Maharachch. & K. D. Hyde 2018	<div><p>Pseudotruncatella arezzoensis R.H. Perera, Camporesi, Maharachch. &amp; K.D. Hyde, sp. nov. Fig.2</p> <p>Index fungorum number: IF553933, Facesoffungi number: FoF 03839</p> <p>Etymology:— Refers to the name of the Province in Italy where the fungus was collected.</p> <p>Saprobic on dead branches of Cytisus and Helichrysum species. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph:</p> <p>Conidiomata 230–275 μm high, 255–280 μm wide, pycnidioid, scattered or gregarious, rounded to oval in outline,</p> <p>unilocular, immersed to semi-immersed, epidermal to sub-epidermal in origin. Peridium 3.6–6.5 μm wide, comprising hyaline to pale brown, thick-walled cells of textura angularis. Conidiophores 11–35 × 1.5–3.3 μm (x = 21.6 × 2.3</p> <p>μm, n = 20) diam., arising basal and lateral cavity-surface of conidioma, cylindrical, septate, branched, sometimes unbranched or reduced to conidiogenous cells, smooth, hyaline. Conidiogenous cells 5.7–28 × 1.4–3 μm (x = 16.6 × 2</p> <p>μm, n = 25) diam., cylindrical, occasionally ampulliform, holoblastic, annelledic, with a few percurrent proliferations,</p> <p>indeterminate, integrated, hyaline, smooth, thick-walled, with several percurrent proliferations. Conidia 20–25 × 5.4– 6.5 μm diam. (x = 22.1 × 5.8 μm, n = 50), fusiform to clavate, straight, 3-septate, not constricted at septa, bearing 3 apical appendages, guttulate; basal cell 4.5–7.1 × 2.5–3.4 (x = 5.9 × 2.8 μm) diam., narrowly obconic with a truncate base, hyaline, smooth, thick-walled; 2-median cells together 6.7–8.9 × 4.3–6.5 (x = 7.7 × 5.2 μm) diam., large, dark brown, thick, smooth-walled; upper median cell subcylindrical to conic, lower median cell narrowly obconic, thick-walled; apical cell conic, hyaline, smooth-walled 1.6–2.8 × 1.4–2.6 (x = 2.1 × 2.1 μm); apical appendages 20–26 μm (x = 23.7 μm) long, simple, tubular, hyaline, smooth-walled.</p> <p>Culture characters:— Conidia germinating on PDA within 18 hours. Colonies on PDA reaching 35 mm within 14 days when incubated at 25 °C. Margins effuse, white, flat, lacking aerial mycelium reverse pinkish white.</p> <p>Material examined:— ITALY, Croce di Pratomagno (province of Arezzo [AR]), on dead aerial branch of Cytisus scoparius (L.) Link (Fabaceae), Camporesi Erio, 26 October 2013, IT 1491 (MFLU 15-2285, holotype); ibid., dead aerial stem of Helichrysum italicum (Roth) G. Don fil. (Asteraceae), 18 July 2013, IT 1322 E (MFLU 17-1776, paratype); extype living culture MFLUCC 14-0988; ex-paratype living culture MFLUCC 17-2642.</p> <p>Notes:— Phylogenetic analysis of combined LSU, ITS and SSU sequence data confirms that Pseudotruncatella is phylogenetically distant from members of Sporocadaceae (Fig. 1). Pseudotruncatella is similar to Truncatella in forming 3- septate conidia, with pigmented median cells and hyaline apical and basal cells, with apical appendages. However, Pseudotruncatella can be distinguished from Truncatella by dark brown, subcylindrical to conic upper median cell (vs. pale brown to brown, subcylindrical to doliiform) and dark brown, narrowly obconic lower median cell (vs. pale brown to brown, subcylindrical to doliiform) (Steyaert 1949, Nag Raj 1993, Sutton 1996, Lee et al. 2006, Senanayake et al. 2015). Further, Pseudotruncatella forms fusiform to clavate conidia with a thick-walled basal cell, while Truncatella species form fusiform conidia, with thin-walled, sometimes deciduous basal cell (Steyaert 1949, Nag Raj 1993, Lee et al. 2006).</p> <p>Mycohypallage B.Sutton,another somewhat similar coelomycetous genus, which was classified in Phyllachoraceae, lacks molecular data (Sutton 1963, Maharachchikumbura et al. 2015, 2016). This genus shows some morphological similarities to Pseudotruncatella by producing brown conidia with appendages. However, M. margaretae Marinc., Gryzenh. &amp; M.J. Wingf. is distinct from N. arezzoensis by possessing 1-septate conidia, with both apical and basal appendages (Marincowitz et al. 2010). The conidiophores of M. congesta (Berk. &amp; Broome) B. Sutton and M. northeae Melnik produce 1-septate conidia with an apical cell modified into a branched appendage (Nag Raj 1993, Marincowitz et al. 2010, Wijayawardene et al. 2106), while our new taxon produces 3-septate conidia.</p> <p>Bleptosporium, Griphosphaerioma, Hyalotiopsis and Monochaetinula, which were maintained in Amphisphaeriales, genera incertae sedis, are also distinct from Pseudotruncatella in morphology. Bleptosporium differs from Pseudotruncatella by forming distoseptate, single appendage-bearing conidia (Morgan-Jones 1974, Nag Raj 1993, Wijayawardene et al. 2016). Griphosphaerioma produces 5-septate conidia, with dichotomously or irregularly branched appendages, which are unrelated to Pseudotruncatella (Morgan-Jones et al. 1972, Sutton 1980, Nag Raj 1993, Wijayawardene et al. 2016). Conidia of Pseudotruncatella resemble those of Hyalotiopsis in color and septation, but differ by broader basal cell and cylindrical or obclavate conidia, and a single apical appendage with 2–4 branches (Sutton 1980, Nag Raj &amp; Kendrick 1985, Nag Raj 1993, Wijayawardene et al. 2016). Monochaetinula is distinct from Pseudotruncatella with 3–4-septate, conidia with a single appendaged apical cell and olivaceous to pale brown median cells (Muthumary et al. 1986, Nag Raj 1993, Wijayawardene et al. 2016).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/296E192BFFC9657419C2F9C7FBCFFA77	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Perera, Rekhani H.;Maharachchikumbura, Sajeewa S. N.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Bhat, D. Jayarama;Camporesi, Erio;Jones, E. B. Gareth;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Al-Sadi, Abdullah M.;Saichana, Natsaran;Liu, Jian-Kui;Liu, Zuo-Yi	Perera, Rekhani H., Maharachchikumbura, Sajeewa S. N., Hyde, Kevin D., Bhat, D. Jayarama, Camporesi, Erio, Jones, E. B. Gareth, Senanayake, Indunil C., Al-Sadi, Abdullah M., Saichana, Natsaran, Liu, Jian-Kui, Liu, Zuo-Yi (2018): An appendage-bearing coelomycete Pseudotruncatella arezzoensis gen. and sp. nov. (Amphisphaeriales genera incertae sedis) from Italy, with notes on Monochaetinula. Phytotaxa 338 (2): 177-188, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.338.2.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.2.2
296E192BFFCB657519C2FA43FD5BFE74.text	296E192BFFCB657519C2FA43FD5BFE74.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Monochaetinula Muthumary, Abbas & B. Sutton, Trans. Br.	<div><p>Monochaetinula Muthumary, Abbas &amp; B. Sutton, Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. 87(1): 104 (1986)</p> <p>≡ Neotruncatella Hyang B. Lee &amp; T.T.T. Nguyen, in Hyde et al., Fungal Diversity 80: 198 (2016)</p> <p>Monochaetinula terminaliae (Bat. &amp; J.L. Bezerra) Muthumary, Abbas &amp; B. Sutton [as ‘terminialiae’], Trans. Br. mycol. Soc. 87(1): 106 (1986)</p> <p>≡ Neotruncatella endophytica Hyang B. Lee, P.M. Kirk, K.D. Hyde, Maharachch. &amp; T.T.T. Nguyen, in Hyde et al., Fungal Diversity 80: 198 (2016)</p> <p>≡ Monochaetia terminaliae Bat. &amp; J.L. Bezerra, Publicações Inst. Micol. Recife 298: 13 (1960)</p> <p>The endophytic genus Neotruncatella Hyang B. Lee &amp; T.T.T. Nguyen was introduced based on N. endophytica Hyang B. Lee et al. (Hyde et al. 2016). The genus is characterized by globose to subglobose conidiomata, ampulliform to subcylindrical, hyaline conidiogenous cells, and fusiform, mostly 3-septate, yellow to yellowish-brown conidia with apical and basal appendages (Hyde et al. 2016). Based on ITS data, its phylogenetic position was confirmed as basal to Bartalinia Tassi, in Sporocadaceae, Amphisphaeriales (Hyde et al. 2016). However, the type species of Neotruncatella, N. endophytica is morphologically similar to Monochaetinula terminaliae (Table 2). Muthumary et al. (1986) synonymised Monochaetia terminaliae Bat. &amp; J.L. Bezerra under Monochaetinula terminaliae with new genus Monochaetinula. Later another 5 species were added to the genus based on phenotypic characters (Bianchinotti 1990, Nag Raj 1993, Matsushima 1996). Monochaetinula species are mainly endophytes: caulicolous, foliicolous, or corticolous, on various plants (Muthumary et al. 1986, Bianchinotti 1990, Nag Raj 1993, Matsushima 1996). Members of Monochaetinula are unified by globose to subglobose conidiomata, fusiform and curved, holoblastic, usually 3 to 4(–7) septate conidia, with colorless to olivaceous brown or olivaceous median cells, and apical and basal appendages (Muthumary et al. 1986, Bianchinotti 1990, Nag Raj 1993, Matsushima 1996). Species of Monochaetinula lack molecular data to confirm their phylogenetic placement. Hence, this genus was reffered to Amphisphaeriales, genera incertae sedis (Senanayake et al. 2015, Wijayawardene et al. 2016). By considering phenotypic similarities and lifestyle, here we synonymize Neotruncatella endophytica under Monochaetinula terminaliae. Hence, the genus Neotruncatella becomes a synonym of Monochaetinula.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/296E192BFFCB657519C2FA43FD5BFE74	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Perera, Rekhani H.;Maharachchikumbura, Sajeewa S. N.;Hyde, Kevin D.;Bhat, D. Jayarama;Camporesi, Erio;Jones, E. B. Gareth;Senanayake, Indunil C.;Al-Sadi, Abdullah M.;Saichana, Natsaran;Liu, Jian-Kui;Liu, Zuo-Yi	Perera, Rekhani H., Maharachchikumbura, Sajeewa S. N., Hyde, Kevin D., Bhat, D. Jayarama, Camporesi, Erio, Jones, E. B. Gareth, Senanayake, Indunil C., Al-Sadi, Abdullah M., Saichana, Natsaran, Liu, Jian-Kui, Liu, Zuo-Yi (2018): An appendage-bearing coelomycete Pseudotruncatella arezzoensis gen. and sp. nov. (Amphisphaeriales genera incertae sedis) from Italy, with notes on Monochaetinula. Phytotaxa 338 (2): 177-188, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.338.2.2, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.2.2
