identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03A1310DFF803552FEA42E55FD171E2C.text	03A1310DFF803552FEA42E55FD171E2C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Thor paulae Kochenborger 2022	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Thor paulae sp. nov.</p>
            <p>(Figs. 1, 2)</p>
            <p>Zoobank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: E6AC08C7- EE6E-4EBB-B6BD-F1B2250C8255</p>
            <p>
                 Type material.   Panama: Holotype, ovigerous female (CL 2.7 mm), UF 60011, Panama, Bocas del Toro,  
                <a title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -82.296/lat 9.2890005)" href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-82.296&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=9.2890005">Seagal</a>
                 (09°17’20.4”N 82°17’45.6”W), colls. M. Leray, F. Michonneau and R. Lasley, 27 May 2016  . Paratypes: 1 male with appendix masculina and  8 females (6 ovigerous and 2 non-ovigerous adults, CL 2.2–2.7 mm), UF 44518 (photo available, one dissected specimen), same data as holotype ;   1 male with appendix masculina (CL 1.9 mm), UF 44289, Panama, Bocas del Toro,  
                <a title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -82.332/lat 9.294001)" href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-82.332&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=9.294001">Ponsak</a>
                 (09°17’38.4”N 82°19’55.2”W), colls. M. Leray, F. Michonneau and R. Lasley, 13 May 2016  ;   7 females (5 ovigerous and 2 non-ovigerous adults, CL 2.0– 2.5 mm), UF 44393 (photo available, one dissected specimen), Panama, Bocas del Toro, Punta STRI (  
                <a title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -82.263/lat 9.349)" href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-82.263&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=9.349">Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute</a>
                 ) (09°20’56.4”N 82°15’46.8”W), colls. M. Leray, F. Michonneau and R. Lasley, 09 May 2016  . 
            </p>
            <p>Etymology. The new species is named in honor of our great friend, Dra. Paula Beatriz de Araujo (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil), who has devoted her career to the study of biology, ecology, and systematics of crustaceans.</p>
            <p>Diagnosis. Supraorbital tooth vestigial or absent. Pterygostomial margin angular, with one tooth. Telson with 3 pairs of dorsolateral spiniform setae; posterior margin with 3 pairs of simple setae. Merus of first pereopod with 1 or 2, rarely 3 or 4, spiniform setae on flexor proximal region.Dactylus of fourth and fifth pereopods with 2 or 3, rarely 1 or 4, spiniform setae on flexor margin.</p>
            <p>Description. Rostrum (Fig. 1A, B) slightly descending, falling short of distal margin of first article of antennular peduncle to reaching distal margin of second article; dorsal margin armed with 4–5 teeth, posteriormost tooth located at about rostral base; ventral margin with minute subapical tooth, rarely 2 teeth or toothless. Supraorbital tooth vestigial or absent.Antennal tooth present, acute.Pterygostomial margin angular, with 1 tooth.</p>
            <p>Pleurae (Fig. 1F) of pleonal segments 1–3 rounded posteroventrally; pleurae of pleonal segments 4–6 acute posteroventrally. Sixth segment 1.6 times as long as fifth; telson 1.1 times as long as sixth segment. Telson (Fig. 1L) 2.5 times longer than proximal width, with 3 pairs of dorsolateral spiniform setae and posterior margin with 3 pairs of simple setae, intermediate pair longest and outer shortest.</p>
            <p>Cornea generally wider and slightly shorter than eyestalk. First article of antennular peduncle with tooth on median region of ventral margin (Fig. 1D); acute stylocerite of variable length from reaching distal margin of first article of antennular peduncle to distal margin of second article of antennular peduncle (Fig.1C); stylocerite with tooth on proximal dorsolateral margin; second article of antennular peduncle with tooth on lateral margin with variable length from reaching half to slightly exceeding distal margin of third article of antennular peduncle; third article of antennular peduncle with triangular plate articulated on dorsodistal margin; inner flagellum overreaching outer flagellum; inner flagellum slender and elongate; outer f lagellum stout, with dense row of aesthetascs (Fig. 1A). Antennal basicerite with 2 ventral teeth; carpocerite variable in length, not reaching or slightly exceeding half-length of scaphocerite; scaphocerite 2.5 times longer than median width, overreaching distal margin of third article of antennular peduncle, with tooth on lateral distal margin (Fig. 1E); antennal f lagellum long, filiform, articulated slightly broader at base than tip.</p>
            <p>Mandible asymmetrical (Fig. 2A), molar process with serrated surface, incisor process with 5 teeth,palp absent. Maxillule (Fig. 2B) with distally truncated and undivided endopod, with distal simple seta; endite with upper lacinia broad, with somewhat acute distomedial angle, with numerous plumose setae and 11 spiniform setae; lower lacinia slender, with numerous plumose setae distally. Maxilla (Fig. 2C) with coxal endite distally truncated and bilobed basal endite slightly rounded, numerous plumose setae on both endites; short endopod, distally slender, with plumose setae; exopod (scaphognathite) welldeveloped, rounded, truncated terminal margin, with numerous plumose setae.</p>
            <p>First maxilliped (Fig. 2D) with coxal and basal endites similar in length,covered by numerous plumose setae; both endites with distal margin slightly rounded; undivided endopod, with plumose setae; exopod well developed and undivided, with some plumose setae on proximal region and numerous plumose setae on distal region; proximal and distal lobes of large epipod similar in width.Second maxilliped(Fig.2E)with protopodite with plumose setae; endopod with 4 articles, merus 3.1 times as long as dactylus, carpus 3 times as long as dactylus, propodus 10 times as long as dactylus, propodus and dactylus with numerous plumose setae; long, slender, undivided exopod, some plumose setae on proximal region and numerous plumose setae on distal region.Third maxilliped (Fig. 2G)overreaching antennular peduncle; antepenultimate article 0.9 times as long as ultimate article, with some plumose setae, distal region unarmed or with 1 papillose seta (Fig. 2F) and 0 or 1 spiniform seta, with variable positions; penultimate article 0.3 times as long as ultimate article, with some simple and plumose setae; ultimate article with many simple and plumose setae, tip with 7 or 8 spiniform setae; exopod not reaching distal margin of antepenultimate article, with tuft of plumose setae on tip.</p>
            <p>Pereopods without epipods. First pereopod (Fig. 1G) of variable length, not reaching or exceeding half-length of scaphocerite; ischium, merus, carpus, and propodus 2.0, 3.2, 2.8, 3.9 times as long as basis, respectively; ischium with 1 spiniform seta on distal flexor region; merus with 1 or 2, rarely3 or 4, spiniform setae on f lexor proximal region; chela slender, fingers 0.6 times as long as palm, both with short setae on cutting edge and tufts of setae on lateral edge. Second pereopod (Fig. 1H) with ischium, merus, carpus, and propodus 4.3, 4.6, 7.2, 2.6 times as long as basis, respectively; ischium with 2 simple and long setae on proximal flexor region; carpus subdivided into 6 articles, length ratio of carpal articles from proximal to distal 2:1:4:3:2.5:3; chela slender, fingers 0.7 times as long as palm, both with tufts of setae on lateral margin.Third pereopod (Fig.1I) with ischium, merus, carpus, and propodus 2.2, 4.3, 2.1, 5.1 times as long as basis, respectively; merus with 1 to 3 lateral spiniform seta on distal region; carpus with tip of dorsal region projected anteriorly; flexor region of propodus with 7 to 16 spiniform setae, distal setae paired; male specimen (UF 44289) with tuft of setae on distal region of f lexor margin; dactylus 0.2 times as long as propodus, distally biunguiculate with 2 or 3, rarely 4, spiniform setae on flexor margin. Fourth pereopod (Fig. 1J) with ischium, merus, carpus, and propodus 2.3, 4.9, 2.5, 5.7 times as long as basis, respectively; merus with 1 spiniform seta on distal region, tuft of setae on distal dorsal region; carpus with tip of dorsal region projected anteriorly; flexor region of propodus with 8 to 12 spiniform setae, distal setae paired; dactylus 0.2 times as long as propodus, distally biunguiculate with 2 or 3 spiniform setae on flexor margin. Fifth pereopod (Fig.1K) with ischium, merus, carpus, and propodus 2.2, 4.2, 2.2, 5.4 times as long as basis, respectively; merus unarmed (rarely) or with 1 spiniform seta on distal region, tuft of setae on distal dorsal region; carpus with tip of dorsal region projected anteriorly; flexor region of propodus with 8 to 15 spiniform setae, distal setae paired, some specimens with tuft of simple setae on distal region of flexor margin; dactylus 0.2 times as long as propodus, distally biunguiculate with 2 or 3, rarely 1, spiniform setae on flexor margin.</p>
            <p>Exopod of uropod 1.1 times as long as endopod (Fig.1L); exopod with distolateral tooth and spiniform setae between distolateral tooth and margin of blade.</p>
            <p>  Type locality. Panama, Bocas del Toro, Isla  Cristóbal , </p>
            <p>NW side, “Seagal”.</p>
            <p>Distribution. Western Atlantic — Panama (this study).</p>
            <p>Variations. One male paratype (UF 44289, 1.9 mm CL) presented a tuft of setae on the distal region of the flexor margin of the propodus of the third pereopod. This tuft was absent in the other male paratype examined (UF 44518, 2.2 mm CL).</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A1310DFF803552FEA42E55FD171E2C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Kochenborger, Mariana Terossi Alexandre Oliveira Almeida Fernando Luis Mantelatto Ana Paula Leite	Kochenborger, Mariana Terossi Alexandre Oliveira Almeida Fernando Luis Mantelatto Ana Paula Leite (2022): Shrimps of the genus Thor Kingsley, 1878 (Caridea, Thoridae): description of a new species using integrative data, remarks on Thor manningi Chace, 1972, and a world identification key. Nauplius (e 2022028) 30: 1-20, DOI: 10.1590/2358-2936e2022028, URL: https://doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2022028
03A1310DFF84355FFEF52A9BFDF218DE.text	03A1310DFF84355FFEF52A9BFDF218DE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Thor manningi Chace 1972	<html xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3">
    <body>
        <div>
            <p> Thor manningi Chace, 1972</p>
            <p>(Fig. 3)</p>
            <p> Thor manningi Chace, 1972: 130 , 137, figs. 59–61; Birkeland et al., 1976: 138; Heck and Wetstone, 1977: 138; Carvacho, 1979: 464; Gore, 1981: 138, 152; Markham and McDermott, 1980: 1270; Carvacho, 1982: 18; Cubit and Williams, 1983:25; Williams, 1984: 134, 137, fig. 96; Bauer, 1985: 150, 152–158; Bauer, 1986: 11–13, 15, 19,23, 25, 27–29, figs. 1, 8,9,12; Martínez Iglesias, 1986: 5, 18, 19,fig. 9B; Young, 1986: 112; Manning and Chace, 1990: 24; Markham et al., 1990: 423; Bauer and VanHoy, 1996: 53–56, 61–71; Duarte and Nalesso, 1996: 143, 148; Hernández-Aguilera et al., 1996: 41; Christoffersen, 1998: 353; Álvarez et al., 1999: 7; Morgado and Tanaka, 2001: 177; Wicksten, 2005: 100, 107, fig. 7; Coelho Filho, 2006: 10; De Grave et al., 2006: 5363.2; Almeida et al., 2008: 23, 28, 38, figs. 2–3; Felder et al., 2009: 1059; Amaral et al., 2010: 249; De Grave and Fransen, 2011: 434; Almeida et al., 2012: 2, 24, 26, 28, 35, app. II; De Grave and Anker, 2017: 33; Tavares et al., 2017: 157, 162, 107–172, fig. 4C; Terossi et al., 2017: fig. 2, tab. S1; Mariño et al., 2018: 4–6; Terossi et al., 2018:79, 87,fig.2; Romero-Rodríguez and Álvarez, 2020: 560, 561, 563, 565, 567, 568, fig. 1A. </p>
            <p> Thor floridanus — (?) Fausto-Filho, 1970: 56; (?) </p>
            <p>Coelho and Ramos, 1972: 152;(?) Heck, 1977:338;</p>
            <p> (?) Heck, 1979: 199; (?) Christoffersen, 1998: 353.  Thor c.  manningi — Rodríguez, 1980: 170, 171, fig. 49. Thornanningi — Young, 1986: 103 (misspelled).  Thor cf. manningi — Fiedler et al., 2010: 5, fig. 1. </p>
            <p>
                 Material examined.   Antigua and Barbuda:  Male , holotype (prehensile, CL 1.3 mm), USNM 135393, English Harbour  ,   Antigua, from bottom of yacht anchored for several months, coll. D. V. Nicholson,  Smithsonian-Bredin Expedition Sta 82-56, 04 April 1956  .  Panama: 1 ovigerous female (CL 2.5 mm), UF 44457 (photo available), Bocas del Toro (09°13’58.8’’N 82°06’43.2’’W), colls. M. Leray, F. Michonneau and R. Lasley, 24 May 2016 ;  1 ovigerous female (CL 1.93 mm), CCDB 6407, Bocas del Toro (09°19.805’N 82°15.087’W), colls. F. Mantelatto et al., 02 August 2011 .  Brazil: Ceará — 2 males (1 prehensile and 1 male with appendix masculina, CL 1.4–1.6 mm), LIMCE-UFC 300, Trairí, Mundaú, colls. PROBIO team, 14 March 2003 ;   1 ovigerous female (CL 2.0 mm), LIMCE-UFC 320,  Paracuru , coll. P.P.G. Pachelle, 23 September 2010  ; 1 male (prehensile) and   4 females (3 ovigerous) (CL 1.2–2.6 mm), LABOMAR 732, São Gonçalo do Amarante,  Terminal Portuário do Pecém , coll. PROCAD team, 29 January 2010  . Pernambuco — 1 ovigerous female and   1 male with appendix masculina (CL 0.9–1.9 mm), DZ/ UFRGS 6849, Cabo de Santo Agostinho,  Praia de Suape , colls. G.L. Bochini, A.O. Almeida and G.O. Soledade, 26 May 2017  ;  2 males (1 prehensile and 1 with appendix masculina, CL 1.1–1.3 mm), DZ/ UFRGS 6850, same location and colls., 26 June 2017 ;  1 female (CL 1.8 mm), DZ/ UFRGS 6851, same location and colls., 23 August 2017 ;  1 female with breeding dress (CL 1.9 mm), DZ/ UFRGS 6852, same location and colls., 28 August 2017 ;  2 ovigerous females (CL 2.0– 2.1 mm), DZ/ UFRGS 6853, same location and colls., 29 March 2018 ;  2 females (CL 2.2–2.4 mm), DZ/ UFRGS 6832, same location and colls., 21 March 2019 ;  2 females (CL 1.8–2.2 mm), DZ/ UFRGS 6833, same location and colls., 21 March 2019 ;   1 male with appendix masculina (CL 1.3 mm), DZ/ UFRGS 6854, Cabo de Santo Agostinho,  
                <a title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -34.950253/lat -8.358306)" href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-34.950253&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-8.358306">Praia do Paraíso</a>
                 , 08°21’29.9”S 34°57’00.9”W, colls. G.L. Bochini, A.O. Almeida and G.O. Soledade, 26 April 2017  .  São Paulo — 1 male with appendix masculina and  5 females (3 ovigerous) (CL 1.1–2.7 mm, one dissected specimen), CCDB 2593, Ubatuba,  
                <a title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -45.030277/lat -23.44972)" href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-45.030277&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-23.44972">Praia Itaguá</a>
                 (23°26’59”S 045°01’49”W), coll. F.L. Mantelatto, 17 September 2008  ;   1 ovigerous female (CL 2.2 mm), CCDB 1850, Ubatuba,  
                <a title="Search Plazi for locations around (long -45.030277/lat -23.44972)" href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=-45.030277&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-23.44972">Praia Itaguá</a>
                 (23°26’59”S 045°01’49”W), colls. F.L. Mantelatto, I.C. Leone and R.C. Buranelli, 16 September 2010  ; 3 males with appendix masculina and 4 females (3 
            </p>
            <p>ovigerous and 1 with breeding dress) (CL 1.8–2.1</p>
            <p> mm), CCDB 2737, Ubatuba, Praia Itaguá (23°26’59”S</p>
            <p> 045°01’49”W), colls. F.L. Mantelatto, R. Robles, M . </p>
            <p>Terossi, I.C. Leone and N.M. Grilli, 22 February2011;</p>
            <p> 1 male with appendix masculina (CL 2.5 mm), CCDB</p>
            <p>3840, Ilhabela, Praia do Engenho d’Água, colls. F.L. Mantelatto and E.C. Mossolin, 12 July 2006.</p>
            <p>Additions to original description provided by Chace (1972). Telson 3 times longer than proximal width, with 3–6 pairs of dorsolateral spiniform setae (frequently 3 or 4 pairs). Acute stylocerite of variable length from reaching distal margin of second article of antennular peduncle to slightly exceeding distal margin of third article of antennular peduncle; inner flagellum overreaching outer flagellum; inner f lagellum slender and elongate; outer f lagellum stout, with dense row of aesthetascs. Antennal basicerite with two ventral teeth; carpocerite variable in length, reaching or slightly exceeding half-length of scaphocerite; antennal flagellum long, filiform, articulated slightly broader at base than tip.</p>
            <p>Mandible asymmetrical (Fig. 3A), molar process with serrated surface, incisor process with 5–6 teeth, palp absent.Maxillule (Fig.3B) with distally truncated and undivided endopod, with distal simple seta; endite with upper lacinia broad, with somewhat acute distomedial angle, with numerous plumose setae and9 spiniform setae; lower lacinia slender, with numerous plumose setae distally. Maxilla (Fig. 3C) with coxal endite distally truncated and bilobed basal endite slightly rounded, numerous plumose setae on both endites; short endopod, distally slender, free of setae; exopod (scaphognathite) well developed, rounded, slender terminal margin, with numerous plumose setae.</p>
            <p>First maxilliped (Fig. 3D) with coxal and basal endites similar in length, covered by numerous plumose setae; distal margin of coxal endite slightly rounded; distal margin of basal endite slightly concave on median region and rounded on tips; undivided endopod, slightly more slender distally, with some plumose setae on proximal region; exopod well developed and undivided, with some plumose setae on proximal region and numerous plumose setae on distal region; proximal and distal lobes of large epipod similar in width. Second maxilliped (Fig. 3E) with protopodite with plumose setae; endopod with 4 articles, merus 5 times as long as dactylus, carpus 3 times as long as dactylus, propodus 12 times as long as dactylus, propodus and dactylus with numerous plumose setae; long,slender, undivided exopod, some plumose setae on proximal region and numerous plumose setae on distal region; podobranch on epipod. Third maxilliped (Fig. 3F) overreaching antennular peduncle; antepenultimate article 0.9 times as long as ultimate article, proximal region with some plumose setae, distal region unarmed or with 1 papillose seta and0,1, 2, or 3 spiniform setae, with variable positions; penultimate article 0.3 times as long as ultimate article, with some simple and plumose setae;ultimate article with many simple and plumose setae, tip with 7 or 8 spiniform setae; exopod not reaching distal margin of antepenultimate article, with tuft of plumose setae on tip.</p>
            <p>Pereopods without epipods.First pereopod of variable length, not reaching or exceeding half-length of scaphocerite; ischium with 1 or 2 spiniform setae on distal flexor region; merus with 1 or 2, rarely 3, spiniform setae on flexor proximal region; chela slender, fingers 0.6 times as long as palm, both with short setae on cutting edge and tufts of setae on lateral margin. Second pereopod, ischium with 2 or 3 simple and long setae on proximal flexor region; carpus subdivided into 6 articles, length ratio of carpal articles from proximal to distal2:2:4:2.5:1:2;chela slender, fingers0.8 times as long as palm, both with tufts of setae on lateral margin. Third pereopod, merus with 1 to 4 lateral spiniform setae on distal region, rarely unarmed or with 5 or 6 spiniform setae, tuft of setae on distal dorsal region; carpus with tip of dorsal region projected anteriorly; flexor region of propodus with 8 to 13spiniform setae, distal setae paired; dactylus 0.2 times as long as propodus, distally biunguiculate with 2 or3 spiniform setae on flexor margin in non-prehensile pereopod (females and non-functional males); absence or presence of 1 spiniform seta on prehensile pereopod (functional males).Fourth pereopod, merus with 1 to 3 spiniform setae on distal region, rarely 4, tuft setae on distal dorsal region; carpus with tip of dorsal region projected anteriorly; flexor region of propodus with 8 to 12 spiniform setae, distal setae paired; dactylus 0.2 times as long as propodus, distally biunguiculate with 2 or 3, rarely 1 or 4, spiniform setae on flexor margin. Fifth pereopod, merus unarmed or with 1 spiniform seta on distal region, tuft of setae on distal dorsal region; carpus with tip of dorsal region projected anteriorly; flexor region of propodus with 8 to12 spiniform setae, distal setae paired, some specimens with tuft of simple setae on distal region of flexor margin; dactylus 0.2 times as long as propodus, distally biunguiculate with 2 or 3, rarely 1 or 4, spiniform setae on flexor margin.</p>
            <p> Type locality. Antigua and Barbuda, Antigua , </p>
            <p>English Harbour.</p>
            <p> Distribution. Western Atlantic — USA (North Carolina, Florida), Bermuda, Mexico (Veracruz, Yucatán, Campeche, Quintana Roo), Cuba, Puerto Rico, British Virgin Islands, Anguilla, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Antigua and Barbuda, Guadeloupe, Dominica, Martinique, Saint Lucia, Grenada, Trinidad and Tobago, Curaçao, Honduras, Panama, Venezuela, Brazil (Seamounts of North Chain, Fernando de Noronha, Trindade Island, Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Bahia, São Paulo). Central Atlantic — Ascension Island (Chace, 1972; Birkeland et al., 1976; Markham and McDermott, 1980; Rodríguez, 1980; Gore, 1981; Carvacho, 1982; Martínez Iglesias, 1986; Young, 1986; Manning and Chace, 1990; Markham et al., 1990; Duarte and Nalesso, 1996; Hernández-Aguilera et al., 1996; Álvarez et al., 1999; Coelho Filho, 2006; De Grave et al., 2006; Almeida et al., 2008; 2012; Fielder et al., 2010; Tavares et al., 2017). Although Chace (1972) reported  T. manningi from the Pacific coast of Mexico (Islas Tres Marias), those specimens were  Thor algicola Wicksten, 1987 (see Wicksten, 1987). </p>
            <p>Variations. The variations in the length of structures or number of spiniform setae of the pereopods did not show any relation with geographic distribution. The number of spiniform setae on the distal region of the merus of the third and fourth pereopods and on the telson dorsolateral surface may vary on each side of the body of the same specimen.</p>
        </div>
    </body>
</html>
	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A1310DFF84355FFEF52A9BFDF218DE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Kochenborger, Mariana Terossi Alexandre Oliveira Almeida Fernando Luis Mantelatto Ana Paula Leite	Kochenborger, Mariana Terossi Alexandre Oliveira Almeida Fernando Luis Mantelatto Ana Paula Leite (2022): Shrimps of the genus Thor Kingsley, 1878 (Caridea, Thoridae): description of a new species using integrative data, remarks on Thor manningi Chace, 1972, and a world identification key. Nauplius (e 2022028) 30: 1-20, DOI: 10.1590/2358-2936e2022028, URL: https://doi.org/10.1590/2358-2936e2022028
