identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
03A7745FFFE7FFD8BD4AEE8D74981E35.text	03A7745FFFE7FFD8BD4AEE8D74981E35.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rubus lasiostylus Focke 1891	<div><p>Rubus lasiostylus Focke (1891) t. 1951</p><p>Rubus lasiostylus Focke var. lasiostylus .</p><p>Rubus lasiostylus forma tomentosus Focke (1891) t. 1951 (as forma ‘ tomentosa ’), nom. inval.; R. lasiostylus var. tomentosus Focke in Lu &amp; Boufford (2003) 232, nom. inval.</p><p>Type. Augustine Henry 5788 A (lectotype designated here K *, http:// specimens.kew.org/herbarium/ K000737817; isolectotypes BM *, CAL, GH *), China, Hupeh [Hubei], Patung [Badong], Mar. 1889. – Fig. 2b .</p><p>Diagnostic characters — Branches, petioles, pedicels and abaxial surface of calyx densely tomentose. Leaves 3–5-foliol- ate. Stipules and bracts linear-lanceolate. Bracts up to 8 mm long. Densely yellow tomentose or woolly drupelets. Styles pubescent that tend to be persistent. Red colour of drupelets (whitish, tannish when dry).</p><p>Distribution — India (Arunachal Pradesh), China. Rubus lasiostylus has been assumed to be endemic to China (Hubei Province). However, the collection from Dibang Valley, Arunachal Pradesh, confirms its presence in India and also constitutes a new addition to Rubus in India.</p><p>Specimen examined. INDIA, Arunachal Pradesh, Dibang Valley,Pasopani</p><p>– Tahupani, 30 June 2002, M. K . Pathak 4099 (CAL).</p><p>Notes — Focke (1891) described R. lasiostylus on the basis of specimens collected on March 1889 by Augustine Henry from Patung [Badong], Hupeh [Hubei] Province, central China. We found specimens in GH *, K * and BM * that can be considered original material. The single herbarium sheet in BM * (barcodes BM000622276, BM000622277) has specimens with two differ- ent field numbers (upper 5788; lower 5788 A). The specimen at K * (barcode K000737817) has an original annotation ‘typica et tomentosa’ by Focke himself and is selected here as the lectotype (Fig. 2a) . The other four specimens, no. 0000011654 and 0000011657 (CAL); no. 0040643 (GH *, all three twigs) and no. BM000622277 (BM *) are considered as isolectotypes .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A7745FFFE7FFD8BD4AEE8D74981E35	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Dash, S. S.;Gupta, C.	Dash, S. S., Gupta, C. (2017): Nomenclatural notes on Rubus lasiostylus (Rosaceae) and lectotypification of three names in Rubus. Blumea 62 (2): 121-124, DOI: 10.3767/blumea.2017.62.02.06, URL: https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2017.62.02.06
03A7745FFFE5FFD9BE10ECD3709F1AA1.text	03A7745FFFE5FFD9BE10ECD3709F1AA1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rubus eucalyptus Focke 1911	<div><p>Rubus eucalyptus Focke (1911) 169</p><p>Rubus lasiostylus forma glandulosus Focke (1891) t. 1951 (as ‘forma glandulosa ’).</p><p>Type. Henry 5427 (lectotype designated here, K barcode 000737813*, http://specimens.kew.org/herbarium/ K000737813; isolectotypes BM,barcode 000885494*, P barcode 00755212*), Central China, Hupeh, So Patung, March 1889. — Fig. 2d .</p><p>Diagnostic characters — Stem, branches, petioles and pedicels glandular. Leaves rhombic-ovate, thin grey-tomentose abaxi- ally. Flowers white.</p><p>Distribution — This species is only reported from China (Gansu, Guizhou, Hubei, Shaanxi, Sichuan).</p><p>Additional specimens studied. CHINA, Central China, Hupeh, Cheinshih, Henry 5872 (CAL 0000011658, GH barcode 00040580*, NY barcode 00429691*, US 00097935*); Western China, Chienshi, E. H. Wilson 950 (A barcode 00040584*, NY barcode 429677*).</p><p>Notes — Focke (1911) while describing this species included the type specimen of Rubus lasiostylus forma glandulosus . Later, Lu &amp; Boufford (2003) also synonymized forma glandulosus under R. eucalyptus as the characters are overlapping. We found three specimens of R. eucalyptus (A. Henry 5427) each from K * (barcode 000737813), BM * (barcode 000885494) and P * (barcode 00755212). The specimen at K * is best fitted to the protologue and it also bears author’s annotations and hence selected here as lectotype (Fig. 2d) and the rest of the specimens as isolectotypes.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A7745FFFE5FFD9BE10ECD3709F1AA1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Dash, S. S.;Gupta, C.	Dash, S. S., Gupta, C. (2017): Nomenclatural notes on Rubus lasiostylus (Rosaceae) and lectotypification of three names in Rubus. Blumea 62 (2): 121-124, DOI: 10.3767/blumea.2017.62.02.06, URL: https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2017.62.02.06
03A7745FFFE5FFD9BE10EFC670061FF3.text	03A7745FFFE5FFD9BE10EFC670061FF3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rubus lasiostylus var. glabratus (Focke) Chand. Gupta & S. S. Dash 2017	<div><p>Rubus lasiostylus var. glabratus (Focke) Chand.Gupta &amp; S.S.Dash, stat. nov.</p><p>Basionym. Rubus lasiostylus forma glabratus Focke in Hooker’s Icon.: pl. 20 (ser. 3, 10) (1891) t. 1951 (as ‘forma glabrata ’).</p><p>Type. Augustine Henry 5788 C (lectotype designated here: GH barcode 00040646*,https://s3.amazonaws.com/huhwebimages/ A868 B955383 D4 A3 / type/full/40646.jpg; accessed on 22 Apr. 2017; isolectotypes CAL), China, Hupeh [Hubei]. — Fig. 2c .</p><p>Diagnostic characters — Branches, petioles, pedicels and abaxial surface of calyx glabrous. Leaves 3–5-foliolate. Stipules and bracts ovate-lanceolate. Bracts up to 15 mm long.</p><p>Distribution — Known only from China (Hubei, Shaanxi, Sichuan, Yunnan provinces).</p><p>Additional specimens studied. CHINA, Hupeh [Hubei], Mar.1889, Augustine Henry 5788 (A barcodes 00277289*, 00040647*, BM barcode 000622276*, CAL barcodes 0000011656, 0000011659, 0000011660, US barcode 00097934*).</p><p>Note — We could trace four specimens in A, BM, CAL, GH and US which can be considered to be original material. On examination, we found that Henry 5788 C (GH barcode 00040646, both twigs) has all the distinct characters as specified in the protologue and thus we selected it as the lectotype and the specimens at CAL (barcodes 0000011653, 0000011655) as isolectotypes .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A7745FFFE5FFD9BE10EFC670061FF3	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Dash, S. S.;Gupta, C.	Dash, S. S., Gupta, C. (2017): Nomenclatural notes on Rubus lasiostylus (Rosaceae) and lectotypification of three names in Rubus. Blumea 62 (2): 121-124, DOI: 10.3767/blumea.2017.62.02.06, URL: https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2017.62.02.06
