identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
038C87D47E229178D20EF93EFEC322D1.text	038C87D47E229178D20EF93EFEC322D1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Garcinia	<div><p>Garcinia gummi- gutta (L.) N.Robson var. conicarpa (Wight) N.P.Singh in B.D.Sharma &amp;</p><p>Received: 25.08.2019; Revised &amp; Accepted: 10.12.2019 Published Online: 31.12.2019</p><p>Garcinia treated this taxon as a variety of G. conicarpa under G. gummi-gutta . According to Stafleu and Cowan (1988) herbarium and types of Wight’s names are at K, E and further materials at A, ADB, B. Authors could trace three specimens of Wight from Shevagherry hills collected on August 1836 with the no. 141 (K000677578, K000677579), 249 (K000677580) and the same was cited as syntype by Noltie (2005) in his book ‘ The Botany of Robert Wight ’. But the specimens from Ceylon (Male) cited in protologue could not be traced. Another specimen of G. conicarpa collected on January 1845 from Shevagherry hills with the no. 142 could be traced at K (K00677577) and the duplicate at CAL (CAL0000024972). Maheshwari (1964) cited a CAL specimen (probably CAL0000024972) as the type. Since this specimen is not a part of original material, the specimen ‘ Wight 141’ from Shevagherry hill at K (K000677578) is designated here as the lectotype of G. conicarpa .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C87D47E229178D20EF93EFEC322D1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	R., Arun Prasanth;Wilson, Karun;Sundaresan, Velusamy	R., Arun Prasanth, Wilson, Karun, Sundaresan, Velusamy (2019): Typification of three names in Garcinia (Clusiaceae). Rheedea 29 (4): 328-330, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2019.29.4.07, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2019.29.4.07
038C87D47E239178D20BFC15FBAC2259.text	038C87D47E239178D20BFC15FBAC2259.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Garcinia gummi-gutta	<div><p>Garcinia gummi-gutta (L.) N.Robson. var. papilla (Wight) N.P.Singh in B. D.Sharma &amp; Sanjappa, Fl. India 3: 111. 1993. Garcinia papilla Wight, Icon. Pl. Ind. Orient. 3(3): 4. t. 960, 960/2. 1845. Lectotype (designated here): Wight’s Illustration in Icones Plantarum 3: 960/2, 1845, (female); Epitype (designated here): INDIA, Kerala, Cochin, 04.1848, Wight 143 (K001273085 digital image!) .</p><p>Notes: Wight (1845) described and illustrated Garcinia papilla based on his collections from Conoor and Sispara. Singh (1993) reduced it as a variety G. gummi-gutta var. papilla (Wight) N.P.Singh. According to Stafleu and Cowan (1988) major part of Wight’s collection is available in K, E and further materials at A, ADB and B. According to Noltie (2005) no possible type for this name is available in K and E. We searched in K, E, A, ADB, B, L through virtual database and consulted CAL and MH. Maheshwari (1964) in his revisionary work of Indian Guttiferae III, mentioned “Type: Wight Conoor and Sisparah jungles, Nilgiri (K)” and considered the taxon as G. cambogia var. papilla (Wight) T.Anderson. We could trace a specimen at K (K001273085) collected from Cochin, ‘ Wight no. 143, April 1848 ’ and a duplicate specimen at L (L0012214) which is annotated as ‘isotype’. The above-mentioned specimens ‘ Wight 143’ cannot be considered as part of original collection as the date on specimens/sheets depicts that the collection is made after the description of taxon in 1845. Original material of Wight’s collection from Coonoor and Sispara could not be traced, therefore the illustration provided in the protologue as ‘plate no. 960/2 (female)’ is designated here as lectotype. The designated lectotype shows only the characters of female plant, but the precise identity of the male plant is based on stamen characters. The specimen ‘ Wight 143’ at K (K001273085) is designated as epitype, as it has male flowering twig and further it is collected by the author himself.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C87D47E239178D20BFC15FBAC2259	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	R., Arun Prasanth;Wilson, Karun;Sundaresan, Velusamy	R., Arun Prasanth, Wilson, Karun, Sundaresan, Velusamy (2019): Typification of three names in Garcinia (Clusiaceae). Rheedea 29 (4): 328-330, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2019.29.4.07, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2019.29.4.07
038C87D47E23917BD09BFCEFFD6027E4.text	038C87D47E23917BD09BFCEFFD6027E4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Garcinia indica (Thouars) Choisy	<div><p>Garcinia indica (Thouars) Choisy in DC., Prodr. 1: 561. 1824. Brindonia indica Thouars in F.Cuvier, Dict. Sci. Nat. 5: 340. 1806. Lectotype (first-step designated by Maheshwari (1964); second-step designated here): INDIA, s.loc., Du-petit Thouars s.n. (P030773 digital image!) . Epitype (designated here): INDIA, Goa, 22.5.2018, Arun Prasanth R. &amp; V. Sundaresan 103 (MH!) Fig. 2</p><p>Notes: Thouars (1817) published Brindonia indica Thouars. Choisy (1824) treated the taxon as Garcinia indica (Thouars) Choisy and mentioned that it is distributed in India. Maheshwari (1964) cited ‘Type: Dupetit-Thouars s.n., India (PARIS)’. We could locate two ambiguous specimens of Dupetit-Thouars’s P (P030772 and P030773). The sheet ‘P030772’ has a label by the author, fragment of stem without leaves, line drawing, male and female flowers in a packet. Whereas, sheet ‘P030773’ has label by author, fragment of stem, and packet containing male flowers. Though the locality of collection was not mentioned on the sheets, the database show that the collections were from Madagascar. Thouars (1817) while describing the taxon cited that ‘the specimen is from India and its bark was taken to France with some seeds but its survival was unsuccessful’. Moreover, Perrier (1950) have not mentioned about its occurrence in Madagascar. Maheshwari (1964), Singh (1993) and Mabberley (2017) reported distribution of G. indica as endemic to India. Based on the above citations, it can be concluded that the specimens of G. indica at P is from India and not from Madagascar. Maheshwari’s (1964) choice could be considered as first-step of lectotypification, since two sheets are available at P. Though the specimens are ambiguous, being part of original collection one of the specimens with barcode P030773 is selected here as second-step lectotype. Since the diagnostic character is fruit, the specimen collected from the type locality ‘Goa’ by Arun Prasanth R. &amp; V. Sundaresan 103 (MH) is designated here as epitype.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C87D47E23917BD09BFCEFFD6027E4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	R., Arun Prasanth;Wilson, Karun;Sundaresan, Velusamy	R., Arun Prasanth, Wilson, Karun, Sundaresan, Velusamy (2019): Typification of three names in Garcinia (Clusiaceae). Rheedea 29 (4): 328-330, DOI: 10.22244/rheedea.2019.29.4.07, URL: https://doi.org/10.22244/rheedea.2019.29.4.07
