Nannoniscus ovatus, MENZIES & GEORGE, 1972
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa174 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A68FDF1F-2825-47D8-B9CE-FEB8432896DF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5639179 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/037E4E73-FF9F-FF83-064C-FBE1FE77AE94 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Nannoniscus ovatus |
status |
|
NANNONISCUS OVATUS MENZIES & GEORGE, 1972 View in CoL
( FIG. 7A–F View Figure 7 )
Material examined: Holotype, male, USNM Cat. No. 121022; allotype female (Vema.U-15–69), under the same accession number as the holotype.
Diagnosis: Body slender, length about 4.9 × pereonite 1 width; Mxp lateral margin devoid of setae; Mxp epipodite reaching proximal third of palpal article 3; pereonite 2 anterolateral tergites each with robust seta; pereonite 7 lacking ventral spine; Op with ventral posteriorly bent spine, posterior margin with ≤ nine simple setae; Urp uniramous, not projecting beyond Plt posterior margin; male PlpI with three hook-like projections distally.
Redescription of male holotype: Habitus ( Fig. 7D–F View Figure 7 ), body length 4.9 × pereonite 1 width. Coxae not visible in dorsal view. Cephalothorax ( Fig. 7D View Figure 7 ) length 0.9 width. Anterior and lateral margins straight, posterior margin slightly rounded. Antennae inserting frontolaterally in deep fold. Pereonites 1 and 2 of equal width, pereonites 2–7 decreasing in width; pereonite 1 length 0.3 width. Pereonite 2 length 1.4 pereonite 1 length, length 0.5 width. Pereonites 2 and 3 of similar length; pereonite 4 length 1.5 pereonite 1 length. Pereonites 1–4 anterior margins frontally directed, rounded; anterolateral tergites of pereonite 2 each tipped with robust seta. Pereonite 5 length 1.2 pereonite 1 length, anterior margin straight. Pereonites 6 and 7 dorsomedially fused, pereonite 6 anterior margin strongly convex. Plt length 0.2 body length, length 1.4 width, width 0.8 pereonite 1 width; posterior margin strongly rounded; anterior margin convex. Urp ( Fig. 7F View Figure 7 ) drawn in situ. Uniramous, length 0.3 Plt length, not projecting beyond posterior margin. Protopodite length 1.4 width. Endopodite length 1.4 protopodite length, length 4.4 width.
Description of female paratype: Habitus ( Fig. 7A–C View Figure 7 ), body length 4.7 × pereonite 1 width. Coxae not visible in dorsal view. Cephalothorax ( Fig. 7A View Figure 7 ) length 0.9 width. Anterior and lateral margins straight, posterior margin slightly rounded. Antennae inserting frontolaterally in deep fold. Op ( Fig. 7B, C View Figure 7 ) length 1.4 width, with strong ventral spine, posteriorly bent. Lateral and posterior margins rounded, posterior margin with several (≤ 9) short simple setae. Pereonites 2–7 decreasing in width; pereonite 1 and 2 widest, pereonite 1 length 0.3 width, pereonite 2 length 0.4 width, length 1.5 pereonite 1 length. Pereonite 3 longest, length 2.1 pereonite 1 length. Pereonites 2, 4, 6 and 1, 5 and 7 of similar length. Pereonites 1–4 anterior margins frontally directed, rounded, anterolateral tergites of pereonite 2 each tipped with robust seta, tergites of pereonites 3 and 4 each with small simple seta. Pereonite 5 width 0.8 pereonite 1 width, its anterior margin slightly concave, pereonite 6 anterior margin strongly convex. Pereonites 6 and 7 fused. Plt length 0.2 body length, length 1.4 width, width 0.7 pereonite 1 width tapering towards distal end; posterior margin strongly rounded, anterior margin convex. Urp ( Fig. 7C View Figure 7 ) drawn in situ. Uniramous, length 0.2 Plt length, not projecting beyond Plt posterior margin. Protopodite length 1.4 width, with three simple setae laterally. Endopodite length 1.1 protopodite length, length 4.5 width, with few simple setae terminally.
Remarks: Menzies & George (1972) did not provide a description of the female of N. ovatus . Yet, owing to gender-related dimorphism also known from nannoniscids ( Wilson, 2008), both sexes are required for morphological comparison.
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |