Coleotichus WHITE 1839

Gerry Cassis & Loren Vanags, 2006, Jewel Bugs of Australia (Insecta, Heteroptera, Scutelleridae), Denisia 19, pp. 275-398 : 306-310

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.12996779

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13715132

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0380878F-FFA0-FFBE-FC2C-FCDBC0E1FB84

treatment provided by

Luisschmitz

scientific name

Coleotichus WHITE 1839
status

 

Coleotichus WHITE 1839 ( Figs 3 View Fig c-e, 6, 7, 8)

Coleotichus WHITE 1839: 541 (nov. gen.); DALLAS 1851: 5 (description); STÅL 1865: 35 (key); MAYR 1866: 13 (diagnosis); STÅL 1873: 4 (diagnosis); LETHIERRY & SEVERIN 1893: 15 (catalogue); SCHOUTEDEN 1904: 4, 5 (description); KIRKALDY 1902: 172 (Hawaii); SCHOUTEDEN 1905 (monograph); KIRKALDY 1909: 313 (catalogue); GROSS 1975: 80 (description); DISTANT 1920: 143 (catalogue); GROSS 1975: 80 (description); MCDONALD & CASSIS 1984: 538 (genitalia); CASSIS & GROSS 2002: 583 (catalogue)

Type species: Cimex costatus FABRICIUS 1787 by monotypy

Diagnosis: Coleotichus is recognised by the following combination of characters: elongate-ovoid ( Figs 3 View Fig c-e); lateral margins of jugae rounded ( Fig. 7b View Fig ); posterior margin of pronotum strongly convex ( Figs 3 View Fig c-e), covering anterior margin of scutellum; metathoracic peritreme mostly rectilinear, sulcate, with apex anteriorly arcuate ( Fig. 7d View Fig ); thoracic sterna strongly keel-like, pro- and mesosternal keels overlapping ( Fig. 7c View Fig ); CAI absent; CAII symmetrical or asymmetrical, bifid ( Figs 8c, d View Fig ), with rounded or digitiform lobal sclerites; CAIII separated or fused ( Fig. 8d View Fig ); and, spermathecal reservoir oval.

Description: Body elongate-ovoid ( Figs 3 View Fig c-e); moderately-sized to large species; moderately convex dorsally and ventrally; wing tip extending beyond scutellum; moderately to densely punctate; pale to dark brown, sometimes with red or green iridescent highlighting (e.g. Coleotichus blackbur-niae ; Hawaii), rarely with patterned darker brown markings. Head: triangular ( Figs 3 View Fig ce, 7a), moderately convex; clypeus broadly rounded at apex and barely surpassing juga ( Fig. 7a View Fig ); jugal margins rounded ( Fig 7b View Fig ); lorae strongly demarcated, margins carinate ( Fig. 7b View Fig ); bucculae narrow, lateral margins weakly arcuate ( Fig. 7c View Fig ). Antennae: AI-AII(a) shortest segments, subequal; AIII-AIV longest segments, subequal or AIV slightly longer. Labium: reaching apex of metasternum ( Fig. 7c View Fig ) to abdominal SIV; LII usually longest segment. Pronotum: large, shield-like, strongly convex ( Figs 3 View Fig ce); anterior margin concave; anterolateral margins rectilinear, carinate; humeral angles rounded to weakly angulate; posterior region of disc greatly expanded, posterior margin strongly convex, overlapping anterior margin of scutellum ( Figs 3 View Fig c-e). Scutellum: elongate, strongly convex, U-shaped, most often strongly tapered posteriorly ( Figs 3 View Fig ce); basal aspects of corium and clavus, and connexiva III-VII exposed ( Fig. 3 View Fig c-e). Thoracic pleura: external efferent system of metathoracic glands well-developed, raised ( Fig. 7c View Fig ); evaporative areas occupying most of metepisternum, and extending to mesepimeron ( Figs 7c, d View Fig ); ostiole moderately-sized ( Fig. 7d View Fig ); peritreme elongate, mostly rectilinear, with apex weakly curved at apex, gutter-like, medially sulcate ( Fig. 7d View Fig ). Thoracic sterna: lateral margins strongly sulcate, prosternal and mesosternal keels overlapping ( Fig. 7c View Fig ), with latter contiguous with explanate anterior margin of proepisternum, rounded ( Fig. 7c View Fig ); metasternal keels thickened ( Fig. 7c View Fig ). Male Genitalia: pygophore ( Figs 7e, f View Fig , 8a View Fig ) large, subquadrate to suboval, ventral margin convex; genital opening dorsal in orientation, broad, suboval, lateral margins densely setose; parameres ( Fig. 8b View Fig ), columnar stem, strongly hook-shaped crown, sometimes base of crown with flange; aedeagus ( Figs 8c, d View Fig ), asymmetrical ( Fig. 8c, d View Fig ) or symmetrical; phallotheca squat ( Fig. 8c View Fig ), sclerotized, without processes; ejaculatory apparatus moderately developed ( Fig. 8c View Fig ); ventral conducting canal with 8-10 paired convolutions ( Fig. 8c View Fig ); ejaculatory reservoir short, oval ( Fig. 8c View Fig ); vesica short to elongate, tapered towards apex, strongly arcuate; conjunctival appendages ( Figs 8c, d View Fig ): CAI absent; CAII asymmetrical ( Figs 8c, d View Fig ) or symmetrical, greatly enlarged, mostly membraneous, distally bifurcate, CAII(L) with short (acute) or large (sickle-shaped) lobal sclerite, CAII(M) with short acute lobal sclerite, or blunt bifid lobal sclerites; CAIII sclerotized ( Fig. 8c, d View Fig ) or membraneous, fused medially or separated, flange-shaped or Sshaped, sometimes bifid. Female Terminalia: ventrally oriented, co-planar; paratergites VIII large, broad, subelliptoid, posterior margin rounded; paratergites IX narrowly elliptoid, medial margins truncate; gonocoxae I transverse, undivided, posterior margin concave, medial margins elevated. Spermatheca: short to moderately-sized proximal fecundation canal; spermathecal reservoir narrowly dilated elliptoid, membraneous; pump with dorsal and proximal flanges; bulb oval.

Diversity and distribution: The highest area of species diversity in Coleotichus is in the Australian zoogeographic region, with seven of the thirteen described species. A number of the species are widespread, with all three Australian species, found also in New Guinea, or surrounding islands, with C. excellens now known from as far north as Taiwan (see below). The genus is also represented in the Oriental region, with two species known from Indonesia (Borneo and Sumatra). Coleotichus is also represented in Pacific islands and archipelagos, distant from Australia, including Samoa, Hawaii and the Marquesas. The most spectacular species of Coleotichus , C. blackburniae , is endemic to the Hawaiian Islands, where it breeds on koa, a native species of Acacia , where both plant and insect are threatened, the jewel bug by green vegetable bug biological control agents (JOHNSON et al. 2005).

Included species: C. adamsoni VAN DUZEE 1932 Marquesas C. artensis ( MONTROUZIER 1858) Australia, New Caledonia, Fiji, Vanuatu, Samoa, Aru Island C. bakeri TAEUBER 1929 Philippines C. biroi SCHOUTEDEN 1905 New Guinea C. blackburniae WHITE 1881 Hawaii C. breddini SCHOUTEDEN 1905 Micronesia C. bulowi SCHOUTEDEN 1905 Samoa C. costatus ( FABRICIUS 1787) Australia, New Caledonia, Tonga C. excellens WALKER 1867 Australia, Fiji, New Guinea, New Caledonia, Samoa, Philippines, Taiwan, Indonesia (Irian Jaya) C. fuscus VOLLENHOVEN 1863 Ambon, Ceram C. marianensis USINGER 1946 Guam C. ornamentifer BERGROTH 1915 Borneo C. sumatranus BREDDIN 1900 Sumatra

Remarks: Coleotichus is a distinctive genus of Elvisurinae , having greatly enlarged thoracic sternal keels, with the pro- and mesothoracic keels overlapping ( Fig. 7d View Fig ). The genus shares some similarities with the nominotypical genus Elvisura , with the pronotum greatly expanded posteriorly, covering the anterior margin of the scutellum ( Figs 3 View Fig c-e). The male genitalia resemble those of Elvisura , in the following ways: the CAII have lateral and medial lobes with lobal sclerites, and the CAIII are sclerotized and fused medially (as in C. costatus and C. artensis ) (e.g., Figs 8c, d View Fig ). LESTON (1953b) described the male genitalia of Elvisura irro-rata SPINOLA , which serve as a basis for this comparative hypothesis.

WHITE (1839) described Coleotichus on the basis of the Australian species, C. costa-tus . SCHOUTEDEN (1904), in redescribing the genus, established three subgenera ( Coleotichus, Epicoleotichus and Para-coleotichus ) on the basis of the prosternal shape, declivity of the male pygophore, and the shape of the female genital plates. GROSS (1975) redescribed Coleotichus , and used these subgeneric categories, giving credence to the shape of the prosternum in relation to the eyes. Our observations indicate that differences in these characters are more indicative of species relationships, and not diagnostic at the genus level.

MCDONALD & CASSIS (1984) added a description of the male genitalia for Coleotichus , and did not adhere to subgeneric categories, without any explicit explanation. Pending a more detailed comparative morphological investigation and phylogenetic analysis of Coleotichus , the sisterspecies relationships are uncertain, and we know of no new evidence that supports the use of subgeneric categories. Aside from the Australian species, the male and female genitalia of the extralimital species of Coleotichus have not been documented; a necessary prerequisite for any further classificatory hypotheses.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Scutelleridae

Loc

Coleotichus WHITE 1839

Gerry Cassis & Loren Vanags 2006
2006
Loc

Coleotichus

WHITE 1839
1839
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF