Eburodacrys nemorivaga Gounelle, 1909

Botero, Juan Pablo, 2017, Review of the genus Eburodacrys White, 1853 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Cerambycinae), Zootaxa 4344 (3), pp. 493-521: 506-507

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4344.3.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D3483E50-9C1E-4FB6-9C82-A70F16788910

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/038387D8-3D79-9417-FF7D-FB44FA83A169

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Eburodacrys nemorivaga Gounelle, 1909
status

 

Eburodacrys nemorivaga Gounelle, 1909 

( Figs. 21–23View FIGURES 14 – 23. 14 – 20)

Eburodacrys nemorivaga Gounelle, 1909: 623  ; Napp & Martins, 1980: 85, fig. 12; Martins, 1997: 61; 1999: 299, fig. 178; Martins & Galileo, 2002: 8 (distr.); Di Iorio, 2004: 26 (distr.); Monné, 2005: 160 (cat.); Wappes et al., 2006: 9 (distr.); Galileo et al., 2008: 16, 77 (distr.); Wappes et al., 2013: 5 (distr.); Nascimento et al., 2016: 556, 565 (distr.).

Eburodacrys curialis Gounelle, 1909: 624  ; Napp & Martins, 1980: 85, 86, fig. 13; Martins, 1997: 61; 1999: 301, fig. 179; Monné, 2005: 157 (cat.); Wappes et al., 2006: 9 (distr.); Galileo et al., 2008: 16 (distr.); Martins et al., 2015b: 291 (distr.); Nascimento et al., 2016: 556 (distr.). Syn. nov.

Eburodacrys hesperidis Chemsak & Linsley, 1970: 304  ; Napp & Martins, 1980: 85, 86; Chemsak et al., 1992: 35 (cat.); Maes et al., 1994: 12 (distr.); Chemsak & Noguera, 1995: 58 (distr.); Noguera & Chemsak, 1996: 397 (cat.); Martins, 1997: 62; Maes, 1998: 890 (distr.); Toledo et al., 2002: 525 (distr.); Turnbow et al., 2003: 7 (distr.); Monné, 2005: 158 (cat.); Audureau, 2008: 6 (distr.); Galileo et al., 2008: 16 (distr.); Noguera et al., 2009: 87 (distr.); Maes et al., 2010: 126, 4 figs (distr.). Syn. nov.

Geographical distribution. Mexico (Sinaloa, Jalisco, Sonora), Honduras, Nicaragua, Colombia (Meta), Venezuela, Brazil (Rondônia, Goiás, Piauí, Bahia, Minas Gerais, São Paulo), Bolivia (Santa Cruz), Paraguay. New state records from Pará, Mato Grosso, and Mato Grosso do Sul ( Brazil) are added.

Type material examined. Holotype male of Eburodacrys curialis Gounelle, 1909  ( Fig. 22View FIGURES 14 – 23. 14 – 20 —MNHN), Holotype male of Eburodacrys hesperidis Chemsak & Linsley, 1970  ( Fig. 23View FIGURES 14 – 23. 14 – 20 —CASC), and Eburodacrys nemorivaga Gounelle, 1909  ( Fig. 21View FIGURES 14 – 23. 14 – 20 —MNHN).

Specimens examined. COLOMBIA, Meta: Remolinos ( Centro Cafam Llanos , 55 km de Puerto Gaitán , 165 m, 4°27’N, 72°54’W), male, 11-15.III.2013, J. Gutierrez leg. ( MPUJ); female, no date indicated, L. Nova leg. ( MPUJ)GoogleMaps  . VENEZUELA, Maracay , female, V.1977, no collector indicated ( MZSPAbout MZSP)  . BRASIL, Pará: Afuá (Ilha do Pará, Igarape Juntinta ), male and female, XI.1995, Magno & C. Alvarenga leg. ( MNRJAbout MNRJ)  ; Mato Grosso: Sinop (12°31’S 5°37’W, BR 163 Km 500 a 600), 2 males, X.1976, Roppa & Alvarenga leg. ( MNRJAbout MNRJ); Vera (12°56’S 5°36’W), female, X.1973, Alvarenga & Roppa leg. ( MNRJAbout MNRJ)GoogleMaps  ; Mato Grosso do Sul: Coxim , female, X.1969, no collector indicated ( DZUPAbout DZUP)  ; Piauí: Corrente , female, 23-27.XI.1991, Amarante, Brandão, Concello, Martins & Ponte leg ( MNRJAbout MNRJ)  ; Minas Gerais: Passos , female, X.1963, C. & T. Elias leg. ( DZUPAbout DZUP)  ; São Paulo: Ibitinga, female, 1.XI.1989, Bergmann, E.C. leg. (“seringueira”) ( MNRJAbout MNRJ); Porto Cabral ( Rio Paraná ); male, 1-10.XI.1941, L. Travassos Filho leg. ( MNRJAbout MNRJ). 

Remarks. Eburodacrys nemorivaga  and E. curialis  were described by Gounelle (1909) in the same paper. According to the author, E. nemorivaga  is easily differentiated from the other species (with three callosities) by the number, form, and disposition of the black areas on the pronotum and elytra and E. curialis  is differentiated by the posterior eburneous callosities nearly absent. Both species were described from Brazil (Goiás: Jataí). Martins (1999), in his revision of the South American Eburiini  , commented on a possible synonymy of these species, asserting that the differences between them may represent intraspecific variability. The study of the material examined, the comparison of the original descriptions and photos of the holotypes of each name confirm the variability of the characters and support the synonymy of E. nemorivaga  with E. curialis  .

As E. nemorivaga  and E. curialis  were described in the same work ( Gounelle, 1909) and in this case the Principle of Priority does not apply, I, as First Reviser, select the name Eburodacrys nemorivaga Gounelle, 1909  as the valid name because it is a name with more citations and with widest geographical distribution.

Eburodacrys hesperidis  was described by Chemsak & Linsley (1970) from Mexico and compared with E. sticticollis  , a Central American species, but not compared with any South American species. The study of a photograph of the holotype, the original description and the material studied allow me propose the new synonymy between Eburodacrys hesperidis Chemsak & Linsley, 1970  and Eburodacrys nemorivaga Gounelle, 1909  .

MZSP

Sao Paulo, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo

MNRJ

Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro

DZUP

Universidade Federal do Parana, Colecao de Entomologia Pe. Jesus Santiago Moure

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Cerambycidae

Genus

Eburodacrys

Loc

Eburodacrys nemorivaga Gounelle, 1909

Botero, Juan Pablo 2017

2017
Loc

Eburodacrys nemorivaga

Nascimento 2016: 556
Wappes 2013: 5
Galileo 2008: 16
Wappes 2006: 9
Monne 2005: 160
Di 2004: 26
Martins 2002: 8
Martins 1997: 61Gounelle 1909: 623

1997
Loc

Eburodacrys curialis

Nascimento 2016: 556
Martins 2015: 291
Galileo 2008: 16
Wappes 2006: 9
Monne 2005: 157
Martins 1997: 61Gounelle 1909: 624

1997
Loc

Eburodacrys hesperidis

Maes 2010: 126
Noguera 2009: 87
Audureau 2008: 6
Galileo 2008: 16
Monne 2005: 158
Turnbow 2003: 7
Toledo 2002: 525
Maes 1998: 890
Martins 1997: 62
Noguera 1996: 397
Chemsak 1995: 58
Maes 1994: 12
Chemsak 1992: 35Chemsak 1970: 304

1992