Maechidius seriepunctatus Moser, 1920
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5205.5.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EEC036E7-C49C-4B42-BB4C-04BB8A6B8D8E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7318525 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038387EA-FFB5-AC6F-12F1-1D9EFA91FBE7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Maechidius seriepunctatus Moser, 1920 |
status |
|
Maechidius seriepunctatus Moser, 1920
Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10
Additional material examined. 1 male ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ): “Neu-Britannien / 20. [handwritten] Ralum [printed] 11.96 [handwritten] / E. Dahl S.” ( ZMHB) .
Remarks. This specimen shows no differences from the lectotype described by Telnov (2020) and personally examined by myself. I did not study the genitalia of the lectotype and Telnov (2020) gave no description or figures of them. The aedeagus of a new specimen ( Figs. 10B–C View FIGURE 10 ) is most similar to that in M. skalei Telnov, 2020 and M. woodlarkianus Heller, 1914 , differing mainly by the tips of parameres more attenuated and curved in profile (cf. Telnov 2020: figs. 712–714, 742–744); however, both the compared species are very different externally. Spiculum gastrale was missing.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |