Xim, Ibarra-Núñez & Chamé-Vázquez & Maya-Morales, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.731.1207 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0EFF0D93-EF7D-4943-BEBF-995E25D34544 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4452289 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0386965E-2C30-FFE9-71B9-FCFE0F53D000 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Xim |
status |
gen. nov. |
Xim View in CoL gen. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:E6CE6724-C10E-47E9-BC3A-9FC415514958
Figs 1–5 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig
Type species
Xim trenzado View in CoL gen. et sp. nov. by monotypy and present designation.
Diagnosis
Xim gen. nov. is sister to a clade including Ceratinopsis Emerton, 1882 , Tutaibo Chamberlin, 1916 and Sphecozone O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1871 . Xim gen. nov. shares with each of these three genera a subtegulum ectal to the tegulum ( Figs 2C, F View Fig , 3A View Fig ), a membranous connection between radix and embolus ( Fig. 2B View Fig ), embolus originated from radix at a distinct angle ( Figs 2B, E View Fig , H–I, 3B), a short, entire epigynum ( Fig. 5 View Fig A–B, G), fertilization duct separated from copulatory duct ( Fig. 5H View Fig ), and copulatory openings at the dorsal plate-ventral plate junction ( Fig. 5 View Fig A–B). Additionally, Xim gen. nov. shares with Ceratinopsis and Tutaibo an intersegmental, straight-hook paracymbium ( Fig. 2C, F View Fig ), a tegulum with papillae ( Fig. 2 View Fig B–C, E–F, H), a spiral radical tailpiece ( Figs 2 View Fig A–B, D–E, 3B) and a radical ridge ( Figs 2E View Fig , H–I, 3B). Xim gen. nov. differs from each of those three genera by having a high cymbium ( Figs 1B View Fig , 2A View Fig , C–D, F), a large paracymbium ( Figs 2 View Fig A–F, 3A), a very short straight embolus ( Figs 2B, E View Fig , H–I, 3B), male cheliceral stridulatory striae scaly, widely and evenly spaced, both sexes with a post-ocular lobe ( Fig. 1B, E View Fig ), male with two series of prolateral macrosetae on femur I ( Figs 1 View Fig A–B, 4A–G), and the female by having strongly oblong, u-shaped spermathecae ( Fig. 5 View Fig C–H). Furthermore, Xim gen. nov. differs from Ceratinopsis by lacking trichobothria on the prolateral side of palpal tibia, by having a retrolateral tibial apophysis ( Fig. 2C, F View Fig ) and the dorsal plate of epigynum with an anterior lobe flush with the ventral plate ( Fig. 5 View Fig A–B, G); from Tutaibo by lacking a cymbial basal excavation and a tegular sclerite on the anterior part of the tegulum, by having a cymbium retrolateral groove ( Fig. 2C View Fig , F–H), an embolic membrane ( Figs 2E View Fig , H–I, 3B), copulatory ducts not encapsulated ( Fig. 5 View Fig C–F, H) and male lacking a proximal dorsal macroseta on the tibiae I and II; from Sphecozone by having a paracymbium ( Figs 2 View Fig A–F, 3A), a cymbial retrolateral groove ( Fig. 2C View Fig , F–H), by lacking a cymbial basal excavation, and by lacking an epigynal atrium.
Etymology
The genus is named after the word spider in the Mam language, whose native speakers inhabit the border area between Mexico and Guatemala. The gender is masculine.
Description
BODY. Small (1.49–1.91), light brown; post-ocular lobe conical, lower in females; AER and PER slightly recurved; male with prolateral macrosetae on femur I; leg formula 1423.
MALE PALP. Tibia with conspicuous prolateral apophysis, small retrolateral apophysis and one retrolateral trichobothrium; cymbium with prolateral and dorsal processes; paracymbium large; tegulum elliptical; radix with spiral tailpiece and serrated ridge; embolus very short and straight.
EPIGYNUM. Ventral plate large, ovoid with anterior semicircular concavity; dorsal plate small rectangular and transverse with large anterior lobe; copulatory openings as narrow slits between ventral plate and anterior lobe of dorsal plate; copulatory ducts short and wide; spermathecae oblong, u-shaped with one mesal and one ectal branch; fertilization ducts small.
Phylogenetic relationships and justification of monotypy
Our phylogenetic analysis yielded eight equally most parsimonious trees (L 1096, CI 0.19, RI 0.58; excluding uninformative characters 104 and 155: L 1094). The topology of the strict consensus of these trees (L 1099, CI 0.19, RI 0.58) is identical to the consensus tree of Frick et al. (2010), except that here (and in each of the eight most parsimonious trees) Xim trenzado gen. et sp. nov. is sister to a clade that includes Ceratinopsis , Tutaibo and Sphecozone ( Figs 6–7 View Fig View Fig ), corresponding to clades 76 of Miller & Hormiga (2004) and 62 of Frick et al. (2010). Circumscribing Xim trenzado gen. et sp. nov. within a polytypic genus would require synonymization of these three genera. Nevertheless, Miller & Hormiga (2004: 402) stated that the monophyly of Sphecozone and Tutaibo are not in doubt and are clearly diagnosable. The phylogenetic analysis supports, with nine unambiguous characters, the hypothesis that Xim trenzado gen. et sp. nov. is not congeneric with the genera included in clade 76 of Miller & Hormiga (2004), making necessary a new genus for this species. The nine unambiguous characters of Xim trenzado gen. et sp. nov. are: cymbium as tall as long (9-1); sperm duct path in distal part of tegulum with thigh kink (23-1), embolus short (43-1), initial orientation of PTA perpendicular (68-0), RTA present (70-1), male with a post-ocular, conical lobe (103-1), cheliceral stridulatory striae scaly (117-1), female palpal tarsus without proximal dorsomesal macrosetae (127-0), female palpal tarsus with one ventroectal macrosetae (132-1).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.