Musca rufiventris, Macquart, 1846
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/z2012n1a3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0387879B-FF9C-FFE3-D1E0-F9DEFD9097F7 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Musca rufiventris |
status |
|
rufiventris Macquart, 1846 , Musca
Musca rufiventris Macquart, 1846a: 328 ( 1846b: 200) , pl. 17, fig.8 (junior primary homonym of Musca rufiventris Scopoli, 1763 ). Lectotype ♂, “du Brésil. Communiquée
par M. Bigot.” ( Brazil), by designation of Pont (1990: 168), in BMNH.
MATERIAL. — Two syntypes, 1 ♂ and 1 ♀, are in that part of the Bigot collection now in the BMNH. Both are on identical pins, and are extremely mouldy.The ♂ is labelled by Macquart “ Musca / rufiventris / n. sp. [deleted]”. They stand over a Bigot drawer label “ M. rufiventris . 1 ♂ 2 ♀ s/ Brasil? Van Diemen.? Macq.”. The ♂ was designated as lectotype and the ♀ as paralectotype (Pont, loc. cit.). With these two syntypes, there is a ♂ from Van Diemen’s Land (Tasmania), which is not a syntype.
CURRENT IDENTITY. — Brauer (1899: 528, no. 268) studied these specimens and thought that they might be Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758 . This synonymy has been confirmed ( Pont 1972: 7; Carvalho et al. 1993: 17; 2005: 26). The Tasmanian ♂ is also Musca domestica .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Musca rufiventris
Pont, Adrian C. 2012 |
Musca rufiventris
MACQUART P. J. M. 1846: 328 |
MACQUART P. J. M. 1846: 200 |