Hylemyia caesia, Macquart, 1835
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/z2012n1a3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0387879B-FFA2-FFDE-D3D1-FF1BFE2A96CB |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Hylemyia caesia |
status |
|
caesia Macquart, 1835 View in CoL , Spilogaster
Spilogaster caesia Macquart, 1835: 296 View in CoL . Syntype (s) ♂ (♂), “du nord de la France ” ( France, Lille area), not in MNHN or MHNL, and presumed destroyed.
MATERIAL. — Described from an unspecified number of ♂♂. No syntypes have been located. There is 1 ♂ in MNHN labelled by Macquart as “N°. 81. / Spilogaster / caesia.”. This is a species of Helina Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 , but does not agree with his description of this species.
CURRENT IDENTITY. — The name caesia was widely used in the 19th century for the species now known as Helina confinis (Fallén, 1825) (syn: anceps (Zetterstedt, 1838)), but both Bezzi & Stein (1907: 635) and Hennig (1957: 159) showed some hesitation in synonymizing true caesia with this species. In my opinion, Macquart’s description of caesia refers to the common European species Helina reversio (Harris, 1780) (syn: duplicata (Meigen, 1826)) , and this synonymy has been published ( Pont 1986b: 149). The species described by Macquart as duplicata a few lines before caesia has “pieds noirs” and cannot therefore be reversio . However, in his description of caesia, Macquart mentions “pieds noirs; jambes quelquefois d’un testacé noirâtre”, which fits reversio exactly.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hylemyia caesia
Pont, Adrian C. 2012 |
Spilogaster caesia Macquart, 1835: 296
MACQUART P. J. M. 1835: 296 |