Trachinus pellegrini Cadenat, 1937
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26028/cybium/2016-402-009 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038787CA-FFA3-281B-FF7E-D60DFD02FEB9 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Trachinus pellegrini Cadenat, 1937 |
status |
|
Trachinus pellegrini Cadenat, 1937 View in CoL ( Figs 2A, B View Figure 2 )
Material examined. - Canary Islands: MMF44358 View Materials , one subadult, 93.6 mm TL, 79.7 mm SL, 28°16.7’N 14°46’W, Banco de Amanay, South-west of Fuerteventura Island , 114 m of depth, cruise Infueco-0710, sta. BV2, soft substrate, 6 Jul. 2010, smallscale bottom trawl GoogleMaps ; TFMC-VP/1946 , one subadult, 113.1 mm TL, 95.0 mm SL, 28°03’N 14°39’W, El Banquete, South of Fuerteventura Island , 188 m of depth, cruise Infueco-0710, sta. DR6, rocky bottom with sand, 10 Jul. 2010, dredge GoogleMaps ; TFMC-VP/1947 ( Fig. 2A View Figure 2 ), one juvenile, 68.0 mm TL, 59.6 mm SL, 28°15’N 14°48.5’W, Banco de Amanay, South-west of Fuerteventura Island, 141 m of depth, cruise Infueco-0611, sta. BV4, soft substrate, 11 Jun. 2011, small-scale bottom trawl. Cape Verde Islands GoogleMaps : MMF42285 View Materials ( Fig. 2B View Figure 2 ), one subadult, 119 mm TL, 101 mm SL, 15°55’N 22°56’W, Ponta Lacacão, Boa Vista Island, 122-137 m of depth, cruise Camarão-2, sta. 15, rocky bottom with sand, 7 Mar. 2012, bottom fish trap GoogleMaps .
Selected body proportions and meristics of the specimens studied are shown in table I and compared with the scarce morphology data available from the literature ( Cadenat, 1937, 1938).
Regarding body proportions, data from the specimens examined herein agree in all respects with published data ( Tab. I View Table I ). Our specimens extend, above or below, the proportions IOD in %EDh, TL/Bdepth, TL/HL, EDh/SnL, PsOL/SnL and HL/EDh. In our specimens, pectoral fin length ( PL) seems to show a tendency to decrease with size. The opposite seems to occur with least depth of caudal peduncle (CPHt) and also with caudal peduncle length ( CPL) (taken at ventral profile). Also, inter-orbital distance ( IOD) seems to increase with size ( Tab. I View Table I ).
When comparing with the holotype, meristics of the specimens examined herein agree in almost all respects, except for some minor differences ( Tab. I View Table I ), e.g. in second dorsal fin rays (one ray less), anal fin rays (one more ray), pectoral fin rays (14-16 vs 17) and caudal fin rays (two more rays). Our adult and subadult specimens bear six spines in the first-dorsal fin, except for the juvenile individual, which has only five spines. Lower gill rakers on the 1 st arch coincide with the holotype. There is no published information on upper gill rakers to compare with our data. Lateral line scales ranged from 74 to 82 in our specimens, thus establishing a range that was not previously known. Antero-supraorbital spines in our material ranged from two to three, with one juvenile specimen bearing two on the right side and three on the left. Adult and subadult specimens examined have no preopercular spines. The juvenile has four small spines on the lower edge of preopercle ( Tab. I View Table I ).
Anal-fin rays are fleshy and their segmentation is hardly visible in adult or subadult specimens (ranging 94-119 mm TL), while they are not fleshy and segmentation is well visible in the juvenile specimen examined (68 mm TL).
Like in Roux (1981), our four specimens have the first dorsal-fin bluish grey. On the comparative table in Cadenat (1938), the author says the first dorsal fin is entirely transparent. However, in the text describing the species, Cadenat (1937, 1938) clarified that first dorsal-fin of type material is light bluish grey, bordered excessively pale yellow and with no trace of black spots, as found in other species.
Regarding the extraordinary development of the second-dorsal rays, Cadenat (1938) says that it is a minor character, manifesting perhaps at the time of reproduction, or is only a secondary sexual character in males.
The maximum published length for the species is 200 mm TL, common length 150 mm TL ( Roux, 1990). Our material ranges from 68 to 119 mm TL, most probably corresponding to juvenile to subadult individuals.
Remarks. - T. pellegrini is an eastern Atlantic species, ranging from Mauritania ( Froese and Pauly, 2015, FishBase) and Senegal to Nigeria, including the Cape Verde Islands ( Roux, 1990). Previous records from the Canary Islands by Roux (1981, 1990) could not be confirmed. Its presence around the Cape Verde Islands was confirmed by Menezes et al. (2004).
This is a tropical demersal species, inhabiting rock and sand bottoms ( Roux, 1981), to a maximum depth of 188 m [previously 150 m ( Roux, 1981; Schneider, 1990)]. The specimens examined herein were collected on rocky bottom with sand and on soft substrata, at depths between 122 and 137 m (Cape Verdes) and from 114 to 188 m (Canaries). The upper limit of its vertical distribution remains unknown. According to Roux (1981) it feeds mainly on crustaceans.
Trachinus pellegrini View in CoL is recorded for the first time from the Canary Islands waters fixing now the northernmost limit (28°16.7’N) of the species distribution. Although the species was known with certainty from the Senegalese coasts ( Roux, 1990), Roux (1981) had already pointed out “possibly ranging further north” and it has been recently found in Mauritania ( Froese and Pauly, 2015, FishBase). Moreover, T. pellegrini View in CoL is, up to date, the only Trachinus species inhabiting both the Canary and Cape Verde Islands.
In the last thirty years, sea surface temperature in the area of the Canary Islands has shown and increasing trend ( Santos et al., 2012), with records over 24°C. In this scenario, the appearance of T. pellegrini View in CoL in the Canary Islands waters would not be surprising, and its presence could be one more evidence of the changes in the distribution of species due to warming in the Atlantic. This phenomenon (‘tropicalization’) has been observed in the Canaries even for species with low dispersal ability ( Falcón et al., 2002; Brito et al., 2005).
Another hypothesis explaining the present record of T. pellegrini in the Canaries could be its misidentification with T. radiatus , since both species have radiating bony crests on top of head behind eyes. Possibly the species is also present in the Atlantic Moroccan and Saharan neighboring coasts and has passed unnoticed. If this is the case, we are in the presence of a eurythermal species, occurring both in tropical waters (Cape Verdes) and in temperate waters (Fuerteventura banks, Canaries).
Acknowledgements. – The authors are indebted to researchers and tech- nical personnel participating in cruises and projects, which supported this work. Thanks are also due to the masters and crews of the research vessels. Cruises Infueco-0710 and Infueco-0611 were conducted in the framework of project INDEMARES (Code n° 1103009000), funded by EC Life+. Cruise Camarão-2 was made in the framework of project MARPROF-CV (PCT MAC 2007-2013, MAC/3/C124) co-funded by EU ERDF.
MMF42285 1 specimen 119 mm TL Cape Verde Islands Present study | TFMC/VP1946 1 specimen 113 mm TL Canary Islands Present study | MMF44358 1 specimen 94 mm TL Canary Islands Present study | TFMC/VP1947 1 specimen 68 mm TL Canary Islands Present study | Cadenat (1937, 1938) 2 spec., 137-140 mm TL Cape Verde Islands holotype, 215 mm TL Guinea-Conakry | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
mm | in in %SL %HL | mm | in in %SL %HL | mm | in %SL | in %HL | mm | in in %SL %HL | in in %SL %HL | |||
Morphometrics and body proportions | ||||||||||||
Standard length, SL | 101.0 | – | – | 95.0 | – | – | 80.0 | – | – | 60.0 | – – | – – |
Pre-first dorsal length, PD1L | 26.0 | 25.7 | – | 21.0 | 22.5 | – | 19.0 | 23.5 | – | 16.0 | 26.1 – | no data – |
Pre-second dorsal length, PD2L | 39.0 | 38.6 | – | 35.0 | 36.8 | – | 28.0 | 35.1 | – | 21.0 | 35.8 – | no data – |
Preanal length, PAL | 41.0 | 40.6 | – | 35.0 | 37.2 | – | 28.0 | 34.8 | – | 25.0 | 42.7 – | no data – |
Pre-anus length, PAnL | 39.0 | 38.6 | – | 33.0 | 34.4 | – | 27.0 | 33.7 | – | 25.0 | 41.6 – | no data – |
Prepectoral length, PPL | 32.0 | 31.7 | – | 26.0 | 26.9 | – | 21.0 | 26.4 | – | 18.0 | 30.2 – | no data – |
Pectoral fin length, PL | 18.0 | 17.8 | – | 18.0 | 19.3 | – | 16.0 | 20.3 | – | 15.0 | 25.9 – | no data – |
Head length, HL | 31.0 | 30.7 | – | 27.0 | 28.7 | – | 23.0 | 28.9 | – | 20.0 | 32.7 – | no data – |
Head height at posterior border of orbit, HHt | 19.0 | 18.8 | – | 15.0 | 16.1 | – | 12.0 | 15.4 | – | 11.0 | 19.0 – | no data – |
Preopercular length, POpL | 20.0 | 19.8 | – | 21.0 | 22.1 | – | 17.0 | 20.8 | – | 14.0 | 23.3 – | no data – |
Maximum body depth, Bdepth (at anus level) | 25.0 | 24.8 | – | 21.0 | 21.7 | – | 18.0 | 22.4 | – | 15.0 | 24.5 – | no data – |
Least depth of caudal peduncle, CPHt | 8.0 | 7.9 | – | 7.0 | 7.4 | – | 6.0 | 7.1 | – | 4.0 | 6.7 – | no data – |
Caudal peduncle length, CPL (at ventral profile) | 7.0 | 6.9 | – | 4.0 | 4.2 | – | 2.5 | 3.1 | – | 2.0 | 3.1 – | no data – |
Snout length, SnL (until mid level of eye) | 5.0 | – | 16.1 | 3.5 | – | 12.8 | 3.3 | – | 14.3 | 2.6 | – 13.1 | – no data |
Eye diameter, EDh (horizontal) | 8.5 | – | 27.4 | 6.5 | – | 23.7 | 6.2 | – | 26.8 | 5.7 | – 29.4 | – 26.7-28.6 |
Eye diameter, EDv (vertical) | 7.0 | – | 22.6 | 5.0 | – | 18.4 | 5.3 | – | 23.0 | 5.0 | – 25.6 | – no data |
Inter-orbital distance, IOD | 2.5 | – | 8.1 | 2.0 | – | 7.3 | 1.3 | – | 5.5 | 1.0 | – 5.0 | – no data |
Post-orbital length, PsOL | 19.0 | – | 61.3 | 18.0 | – | 66.0 | 14.0 | – | 60.9 | 12.0 | – 60.4 | – no data |
Upper jaw length, UpJL | 14.0 | – | 45.2 | 13.0 | – | 48.3 | 11.0 | – | 46.0 | 9.0 | – 47.2 | – no data |
Gape length, GL | 11.0 | – | 35.5 | 11.0 | – | 40.6 | 9.0 | – | 38.2 | 7.0 | – 37.8 | – no data |
Length of longest dorsal–fin ray (4th) | 8.0 | 7.9 | 25.8 | broken | 13.1+ | 45.7+ | 14.8 | 18.6 | 64.5 | 6.8 | 11.4 34.9 | no data no data |
Length of longest anal–fin ray | 8.0 | 7.9 | 25.8 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 24.5 | 5.3 | 6.6 | 22.9 | 5.5 | 9.2 28.2 | no data no data |
IOD in %EDh | 29.4 | 30.9 | 20.6 | 17.1 | 25.0 | |||||||
TL/Bdepth | 4.76 | 5.48 | 5.25 | 4.64 | 4.75-5.00 | |||||||
TL/HL | 3.84 | 4.15 | 4.07 | 3.49 | 3.75- 4.05 | |||||||
EDh/SnL | 0.59 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.50 | |||||||
PsOL/SnL | 3.80 | 5.14 | 4.24 | 4.60 | 4.90 | |||||||
HL/EDh | 3.65 | 4.21 | 3.73 | 3.40 | 3.50-3.75 |
PL |
Západoceské muzeum v Plzni |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Trachinus pellegrini Cadenat, 1937
González, José A., González-Jiménez, José F., Triay-Portella, Raül, Jiménez, Sebastián, González-Lorenzo, Gustavo & Biscoito, Manuel 2016 |
Trachinus pellegrini
Cadenat 1937 |
T. pellegrini
Cadenat 1937 |
T. pellegrini
Cadenat 1937 |