Austerocardiochiles simulatus Long, 2019

Long, Khuat Dang, Oanh, Nguyen Thi, Dzuong, Nguyen Van & Hoa, Dang Thi, 2019, Two new species of the genus Austerocardiochiles Dangerfield, Austin & Whitfield 1999 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Cardiochilinae) from Vietnam, Zootaxa 4657 (3), pp. 587-595 : 592-594

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4657.3.11

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3B16A7DA-C903-4F54-8FC4-0B08B8C9B898

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5937218

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038787D8-FFE0-FFF9-0EDB-B8BC11DCFC48

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Austerocardiochiles simulatus Long
status

sp. nov.

Austerocardiochiles simulatus Long , sp. n.

( Figs 14–25 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURES 15–25 )

Material. Holotype, female, ‘ Card.164 ’ (VNMN), NE. Vietnam: Tuyen Quang, Na Hang NP, Son Phu , forest, MT, 22°17’32’’N 105°28’19’’E, 573m, 5.vi.2017, KD Long. GoogleMaps

Description. Holotype, female, body length 7.9 mm, fore wing length 7.8 mm, antenna 4.5 mm, ovipositor sheath 1.5 mm ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 ).

Head. Eyes rather densely pilose; antenna with 46 antennomeres; third antennomere 1.5 × fourth antennomere (12:8); apical antennomere 2.0× as long as subapical; ventral margin of clypeus evenly convex with two faint tubercles ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 15–25 ); face rugo-punctate; clypeal suture indistinct; face width 1.2 × length of face and clypeus combined (47:39); distance between tentorial pits 2.6 × distance between pit and eye margin (26:10); basal width of mandible 1.3 × distance from mandible to eye margin (13:10) ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 15–25 ); in dorsal view, head median length 0.5 × as long as width (42:82); eye length 1.5 × temple (25:17); POL:OD:OOL=6:5:20 ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 15–25 ); frons depressed laterally, with smooth median carina, transversely striate; in lateral view, transverse width of eye 0.8 × temple (15:19); vertex and temple coarsely rugose ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 15–25 ).

Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.6 × height (76:47) ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 15–25 ); notauli evenly wide, crenulate ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 15–25 ); median lobe of mesoscutum with deep crenulate median depression ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 15–25 ); lobes of mesoscutum largely punctate anteriorly, sparsely punctate posteriorly; scutellar sulcus 0.5 × as long as scutellum (10:19), with 4 carinae ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 15–25 ); scutellum coarsely rugose; propodeum with areola, propodeal areola length 1.8 × as long as wide (27:15) ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 15–25 ); side of pronotum coarsely rugose; epicnemial absent; precoxal sulcus wide and shallow, rugose; mesopleuron smooth medially, almost punctate-reticulate dorsally and ventrally ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 15–25 ); metapleuron coarsely rugose.

Legs. Fore tibial spur 0.7 × as long as fore basitarsus (17:23); length of hind femur, tibia and basitarsus 2.9, 7.4 and 3.8 × their maximum width, respectively; hind coxa largely rugo-punctate; hind femur densely punctate; inner hind tibial spur 1.54 × outer tibial spur (17:11), and 0.7 × hind basitarsus (17:23); hind basitarsus 0.4 × hind tibia (23:57), and slightly longer hind tarsus 2–5 (23:22); hind tarsal claw pectinate, with 6 teeth ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 15–25 ).

Wings. Length of fore wing 2.7 × its maximum width (122:45); pterostigma length 3.5 × width (45:13) ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 15–25 ); r:3-SR:2-SR=9:35:24; vein 2-SR+M 1.4 × vein m-cu (14:10); vein m-cu 0.4 × vein 1-M (8:20); vein 1-CU1 0.4 × vein 2-CU1 (8:21) and 0.8 × vein cu-a (8:10); second submarginal cell 2.4 × as long as wide; length of hind wing 3.95 × its maximum width (91:23); vein M+CU slightly longer vein 1-M (37:35); vein 1-M 3.2 × vein 1r-m (35:11); hind wing with 6 hamuli ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 15–25 ); vein 2-SC+R vertical.

Metasoma. Metasoma 0.95 × as long as head and and mesosoma combined (57:60); first metasomal tergite widened apically ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 15–25 ), 0.95 × as long as broad (41:43), and 1.5 × as long as propodeum (41:28); first metasomal tergite smooth basally, recticulate medio-apically ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 15–25 ), rugo-punctate latero-apically; second tergite with basal area ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 15–25 ); median length of second tergite 0.26 × as long as basal width (13:50), and 0.52 × third tergite (13:25) ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 15–25 ); hypopygium pointed apically, largely desclerotized, folded basally; setose part of ovipositor sheath 0.7 × as long as hind tibia (23:33).

Color. Largely black; fore leg black, except fore femur yellow latero-ventrally and apically; tibia and tarsus yellow; middle and hind legs black; wing veins blackish brown; fore wing membrane dark brown in apical 0.7 and hyaline in 0.3 of the wing; membrane of hind wing hyaline, except dark apically.

Male: Unknown.

Etymology. From “simulo” (Latin for “imitate”, “copy”), because this new species is similar to A. tujiazu Chen, Whitfield & He , from China.

Biology: Unknown.

Comments. Differences between the new species and A. tujiazu are given in the key. Additionally A. simulatus , sp. n. differs from A. tujiazu by having the following characters: a) Eyes rather densely pilose ( Figs 15, 17 View FIGURES 15–25 ); b) Median lobe of mesoscutum U-shaped, with long median crenulated depression ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 15–25 ); c) Vein 2-SR+M of fore wing 1.4 × as long as vein m-cu; d) First metasomal tergite punctate-reticulate medio-apically ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 15–25 ); and e) Setose part of ovipositor sheath 0.7 × as long as hind tibia.

MT

Mus. Tinro, Vladyvostok

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF