Campodea (Campodea) galilaea Wygodzinsky, 1942
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.198536 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6197029 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038887DE-FFC2-9F08-FABB-A9F657E6FA74 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Campodea (Campodea) galilaea Wygodzinsky, 1942 |
status |
|
Campodea (Campodea) galilaea Wygodzinsky, 1942
Material examined. 1 ɗ, 1 Ψ, Diyarbakır city centre, Kampüs, 2-V-2005, A. Satar leg.
Each of two intact antennae had 25 articles and a latero-ventral sensillum. The adult male’s body length was 3 mm, but lacked observable spermatozoid fascicles. Urosternite I lacked g1 -setae and the lateral appendages of urosternite I possessed glandular a1 and a2 setae.
This species was described ( Wygodzinsky 1942) from Degania, near the Sea of Galilee ( Israel, former Palestine), from females only, but Condé (1947) reported on males from Lebanon. The Lebanese males were young, without g1 -setae on urosternite I. Bareth (1980) tentatively described specimens from Sardinia as Campodea cf. galilaea , which differed from the type specimens by the lack of macrochaetae la on urotergite V and the presence of both glandular g1 - and a2 - setae on the male urosternite I.
Our new observations contradict the assignment of the Sardinian specimens to C. galilaea , which probably represent a separate species. The known range of C. galilaea remains the eastern Mediterranean region.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |