Subergorgia rubra Thomson, 1905
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5236.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:796FF9F5-E71F-4C69-92CC-CF4D6752BD77 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7639357 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0388B641-7B00-FFBA-FF56-FEDEFDB6FB32 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Subergorgia rubra Thomson, 1905 |
status |
|
Subergorgia rubra Thomson, 1905 View in CoL View at ENA
Subergorgia rubra Thomson, 1905: 172 View in CoL , fig. 4 (Sri Lankan seas); Stiasny 1937: 107, pl. 8, figs. 49–52, text fig. II; Grasshoff 1999: 15, fig. 17a ( New Caledonia); Grasshoff 2000: 7, figs. 6–7 (Red Sea); Fernando, 2011: 18–19, pl. 2, fig. 2–2e (Cuddalore).
Opinion: There is evidence that this species occurs in the region.
Justification:
These Indian records seem to be either invalid or unconfirmable: Kumar et al. 2014a: 106, pl. 50, fig. A–D (South Andaman); Fernando et al. 2017: 17, pl. 3, fig. A–D (Cuddalore).
Literature analysis:
This species was erected by Thomson (1905) for a specimen from Sri Lankan waters, but the description, with no sclerite figures, is totally inadequate to characterise this species. Grasshoff (1999) stated that he had examined a fragment of the holotype to confirm the species occurs in the Maldives and said that the description by Stiasny (1937) is correct.
In the account of the species in Fernando (2011) and Fernando et al. (2017) the text is identical, but the illustrations are different even though the material examined is the same. But, in the account of the species in Fernando et al. (2017) and Kumar et al. (2014a) the text is different, but the illustrations are identical even though the material examined is different.
The specimen figured by Fernando (2017) and Kumar et al. (2014a) with its secund branching and secondary dichotomy is quite different from the colony in their underwater photograph and also very different from the irregularly-pinnate/laterally-branched colony illustrated by Stiasny. Likewise, the figured spindles with their large warts, some in girdles, bear little resemblance to the densely warted, robust spindles and ovals figured by Stiasny and also by Grasshoff. However, the colony and the sclerites illustrated with the description by Fernando (2011) do look very much like Subergorgia rubra . Kumar et al. (2015) lists the species and provides the colony figure from the 2014 and 2017 publications above.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Subergorgia rubra Thomson, 1905
Ramvilas, Ghosh, Alderslade, Philip & Ranjeet, Kutty 2023 |
Subergorgia rubra
Fernando, S. A. 2011: 18 |
Grasshoff, M. 2000: 7 |
Grasshoff, M. 1999: 15 |
Stiasny, G. 1937: 107 |
Thomson, J. A. 1905: 172 |