Erythropodium pambanensis Fernando, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5236.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:796FF9F5-E71F-4C69-92CC-CF4D6752BD77 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7639341 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0388B641-7B02-FFB8-FF56-FE23FBF1FBEA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Erythropodium pambanensis Fernando, 2011 |
status |
|
Erythropodium pambanensis Fernando, 2011 (species status uncertain)
Erythropodium pambanensis Fernando, 2011: 17–18 , pl. 2, figs. 1a–1f (Pamban); Fernando et al. 2017: 15, pl. 2, fig. 1a–1f (Gulf of Mannar).
Opinion: This species does occur in the region but appears to be wrongly identified.
Justification:
Literature analysis:
The descriptions of the Indian material by Fernando (2011) and Fernando et al. (2017) are identical but quite possibly represent a new genus. The authors state that “The present is the only tropical Indo-Pacific species {of Erythropodium } known to be reported so far” but an unidentified species was reported from Bali by Fabricius & Alderslade (2001).
A description of Erythropodium caribaeorum was given by Bayer (1961: 75–76: figs. 16 e–g) and clearly shows the form of the characteristic 6-radiate sclerites. The figures of the sclerites provided by Fernando (2011) and Fernando et al. (2017) are so small it is hard to see the details, but at least some of them appear to be 8 radiates and others quite irregularly branched, indicating the genus is probably undescribed.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Erythropodium pambanensis Fernando, 2011
Ramvilas, Ghosh, Alderslade, Philip & Ranjeet, Kutty 2023 |
Erythropodium pambanensis
Fernando, S. & Venkataraman, K. & Raghunathan, C. 2017: 15 |
Fernando, S. A. 2011: 18 |