Bebryce indica Thomson, 1905
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5236.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:796FF9F5-E71F-4C69-92CC-CF4D6752BD77 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7639467 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0388B641-7B26-FF9D-FF56-F9BCFEDBFF36 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Bebryce indica Thomson, 1905 |
status |
|
Bebryce indica Thomson, 1905 View in CoL View at ENA
Bebryce indica Thomson, 1905: 175–177 View in CoL , pl. fig. 3 (Gulf of Mannar); Bayer & Ofwegen 2016: 331–334, figs. 19–20.
Opinion: This species does occur in the region.
Justification:
These Indian records seem to be either invalid or unconfirmable: Fernando 2011: 41–42, pl. 18, fig. 1– 1g (Cuddalore); Fernando et al. 2017: 83, pl. 36, fig 1– 1g (SE coast of India).
Literature analysis: This species was originally described from off Sri Lankan waters but would be very difficult to recognise from that account as shown by the detailed redescription the holotype by Bayer & Ofwegen (2016). The descriptions of the Indian material by Fernando (2011) and Fernando et al. (2017) are identical, and a comparison with the holotype redescription shows that their material is similar but not conspecific and appears to represent a new species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Bebryce indica Thomson, 1905
Ramvilas, Ghosh, Alderslade, Philip & Ranjeet, Kutty 2023 |
Bebryce indica
Bayer, F. M. & Ofwegen, L. V. 2016: 331 |
Thomson, J. A. 1905: 177 |