Astrogorgia anastomosan Fernando, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5236.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:796FF9F5-E71F-4C69-92CC-CF4D6752BD77 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7639429 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0388B641-7B3C-FF86-FF56-FA32FB68F839 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Astrogorgia anastomosan Fernando, 2011 |
status |
|
Astrogorgia anastomosan Fernando, 2011 (species status uncertain)
Astrogorgia anastomosan Fernando, 2011: 70–71 , pl. 46, fig. 1–1d ( Puducherry): Fernando et al. 2017: 153, pl. 71, fig. 1–1d (SE coast of India).
Opinion: This species does occur in the region but its status is uncertain. It seems very similar to Astrogorgia cuddalorensis .
Justification:
Literature analysis: The descriptions of the Indian material by Fernando (2011) and Fernando et al. (2017) are identical, but without detailed descriptions and more images of the sclerites, including the polyp armature, and close-up images of the polyps and calyces it is not possible to distinguish this species from other nominal species. Even then, without a revision of the genus, or examination of the type specimens, it would probably be impossible to assess its validity as a new species. However, the large irregular and branched coenenchymal sclerites are not expected in this genus and it would appear to be closely related to Astrogorgia cuddalorensis Fernando, 2011 , and also has similarities to A. krusadiensis Fernando, 2011 and A. macrosclera Fernando, 2011 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Astrogorgia anastomosan Fernando, 2011
Ramvilas, Ghosh, Alderslade, Philip & Ranjeet, Kutty 2023 |
Astrogorgia anastomosan
Fernando, S. & Venkataraman, K. & Raghunathan, C. 2017: 153 |
Fernando, S. A. 2011: 71 |