Ellisella cercidia Grasshoff, 1999
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5236.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:796FF9F5-E71F-4C69-92CC-CF4D6752BD77 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7639698 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0388B641-7B40-FFFA-FF56-FEDFFBE2FCB4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ellisella cercidia Grasshoff, 1999 |
status |
|
Ellisella cercidia Grasshoff, 1999 View in CoL
Ellisella cercidia Grasshoff, 1999: 78 View in CoL , fig. 129; pl. 8, fig. 4 ( New Caledonia).
Opinion: There is no evidence that this species occurs in the region.
Justification:
These Indian records seem to be either invalid or unconfirmable: Kumar et al. 2014a: 12, pl. 3, fig. A–D (Andaman Is.); Fernando et al. 2017: 230, pl. 108, fig. A–D (Andaman Is.).
Literature analysis: The publications of Kumar et al. (2014a) and Fernando et al. (2017) both present identical accounts, but without more detailed descriptions and larger illustrations of the sclerites it would be difficult to recognise their species, and without a revision of the genus it would probably be impossible to assess its validity as a new species. However, the true characteristics of the Indian material are unknown because the descriptive text is almost word-for-word the same as that in Grasshoff (1999) including the size of the sclerites, which do not have large irregular-shaped tubercles and are quite unlike those of the holotype. Kumar et al. (2015) just listed the species and figured the same specimen, while Kumar et al. (2018a) just lists the species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ellisella cercidia Grasshoff, 1999
Ramvilas, Ghosh, Alderslade, Philip & Ranjeet, Kutty 2023 |
Ellisella cercidia
Grasshoff, M. 1999: 78 |