Paracis pustulata ( Wright & Studer, 1889 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5236.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:796FF9F5-E71F-4C69-92CC-CF4D6752BD77 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7640927 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0388B641-7B56-FFED-FF56-F94EFDCEFE62 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Paracis pustulata ( Wright & Studer, 1889 ) |
status |
|
Paracis pustulata ( Wright & Studer, 1889) View in CoL
Acis pustulata Wright & Studer, 1889: 122–123 , pl. 24, fig. 1, 1a; pl. 27, fig. 6 ( Hyalonema ground, Japan).
Opinion: There is no evidence this species occurs in the region.
Justification:
These Indian records seem to be either invalid or unconfirmable: Thomson & Simpson 1909: 234–236 (Andamans).
Literature analysis: It seems this species does not occur in India because the description published by Thomson & Simpson (1909) indicates they had a different species. Their colony was described as extremely densely branched— forming a "felt-like" "maze", whereas the holotype is sparsely branched; the point sclerites are recorded as smooth, bent, with a few warts on the convex side, whereas in the holotype they have dentate edges and some looked like the thornscales of Paramuricea ; the large coenenchymal plates do not fit closely, whereas in the holotype they have irregular dentate edges that mesh with the neighbouring sclerites; and there are caterpillar-like sclerites where some have a projecting spine at the upper edge of one end, which are not present in the holotype. Also, the holotype was collected from deep water off Japan.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Paracis pustulata ( Wright & Studer, 1889 )
Ramvilas, Ghosh, Alderslade, Philip & Ranjeet, Kutty 2023 |
Acis pustulata
Wright E. & Studer, T. 1889: 123 |