Guyanacaris Sakai, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26107/RBZ-2024-0004 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7CFD201B-2A15-41AC-950A-38FE492813D3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10790161 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038987EE-FFD7-9038-FC51-75C1FAE2FAFD |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Guyanacaris Sakai, 2011 |
status |
|
Genus Guyanacaris Sakai, 2011 View in CoL
Guyanacaris Sakai, 2011: 119–120 View in CoL [type species: Calocaris (Calastacus) hirsutimana Boesch & Smalley, 1972 View in CoL , by original designation, gender feminine]. – Dworschak & Poore, 2018: 62 (synonymy). – Poore, 2020: 264. – Padate et al., 2022: 196 (rediagnosis). – Poore & Ahyong, 2023: 199–200 (rediagnosis, synonymy).
Bruceaxius Sakai, 2011: 82–83 View in CoL [type species: Acanthaxius polychaetes Sakai, 1994 View in CoL , by original designation and monotypy, gender masculine]. – Padate et al., 2022: 202.
Neoaxius Sakai, 2017: 504–505 View in CoL [type species: Neoaxius nicoyaensis Sakai, 2017 View in CoL , by original designation and monotypy, gender masculine].
Remarks. For the most recent diagnoses of Guyanacaris Sakai, 2011 , see Padate et al. (2022) and Poore & Ahyong (2023). The genus is characterised by a mesial spine at the base of the scaphocerite, the presence of a male pleopod 1, curved lateral gastric carinae with several small spines, obsolete supraocular spines, a convex carapace profile and a depressed rostrum. Padate et al. (2022) agreed with Poore (2020) that Acanthaxius polychaetes Sakai, 1994 (type species of Bruceaxius Sakai, 2011 ) and A. spinosissima ( Rathbun, 1906) probably belong to Guyanacaris , thereby arguing that Bruceaxius Sakai, 2011 “should be considered to be a synonym of Guyanacaris ”. Poore & Ahyong (2023) synonymised the two genera. Padate et al. (2022) suggested that the second species, B. thailandensis Sakai, 2015 , lacks a mesial spine at the base of scaphocerite, differing from the typical Guyanacaris and “may be tentatively retained in Bruceaxius ”. However, B. thailandensis cannot be “retained” in Bruceaxius as its type species belongs in Guyanacaris . Furthermore, it is unclear in Sakai’s (2015: fig. 3A) illustration of B. thailandensis if the scaphocerite is shown at all — even if the mesial spine were absent, this would not be taxonomically significant at the genus level. As such, B. thailandensis is hereby transferred to Guyanacaris .
A key to the six species of Guyanacaris follows.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Guyanacaris Sakai, 2011
Kou, Qi, Poore, Gary C. B. & Liu, Xinming 2024 |
Neoaxius
Sakai K 2017: 505 |
Guyanacaris
Poore GCB & Ahyong ST 2023: 199 |
Padate VP & Cubelio SS & Takeda M 2022: 196 |
Poore GCB 2020: 264 |
Dworschak PC & Poore GCB 2018: 62 |
Sakai K 2011: 120 |
Bruceaxius
Padate VP & Cubelio SS & Takeda M 2022: 202 |
Sakai K 2011: 83 |