Schizoretepora imperati ( Busk, 1884 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2019.536 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EC4DDAED-11A3-45AB-B276-4ED9A301F9FE |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038B87B1-3319-6534-F97E-FA57F7EFFBD2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Schizoretepora imperati ( Busk, 1884 ) |
status |
|
Schizoretepora imperati ( Busk, 1884) View in CoL
Fig. 8 View Fig , Table 4 View Table 4
Retepora imperati Busk, 1884: 110 , pl. XXVI, fig 9.
Non Retepora imperati –Waters 1894: 262; 1925: 659.
Non Schizellozoon imperati – Canu & Bassler 1928: 49–50, pl. IV, fig. 10. — Barroso 1935: 378, fig. 6a–d.
Non Schizoretepora imperati View in CoL – Gautier 1962: 235–236.
Material examined
Syntypes
CAPE VERDE ISLANDS • 1 colony; Porto Praya; 100–120 fathoms deep; Challenger exped. [ex Dundee museum collection]; labelled Retepora imperati ; NHMUK 1963.2 About NHMUK .12.202 • 1 colony; same collection data as for preceding; NHMUK 1934.2 About NHMUK .16.23 .
ALGERIA • 1 colony; Oran; [sent to A.M. Norman by A.W. Waters] labelled Retepora imperati ; NHMUK 1911.10.1.813 • 1 colony; same collection data as for preceeding but coll. Mr Alder; A.M. Norman leg.; labelled Retepora imperati ; NHMUK 1911.10.1.814 • 2 colonies, several fragments; same collection data as for preceding; coll. Canu; labelled Retepora imperati ; MNHN-IB- 2014-29 • 1 colony; same collection data as for preceding; coll. Calvet; labelled Retepora imperati ; MNHN-IB- 2008-6052 • 1 colony; same collection data as for preceding; MNHN-IB- 2008-982 • 1 colony; same collection data as for preceding; MNHN-IB- 2008-983.
ITALY • 1 colony; Sicily, Palermo; Marquis di Monterosto leg., coll. A.M. Norman; labelled Retepora imperati ; NHMUK 1911.10 About NHMUK .1.1374 .
MOROCCO • 2 colonies; st CX, 1926, R/V Vanneau exped.; coll. Canu; labelled Retepora imperati ; MNHN-IB- 2008-9955 • 1 colony; SW Alboran Sea, st. 1294; 3 Sep. 1958; R/V Calypso; coll. Gautier; labelled Retepora imperati ; MNHN-IB- 2008-11299.
Description
Colony erect, regularly fenestrate (reteporiform); frontal surfaces bearing autozooids, abfrontal faces consisting of sheets of kenozooids. Trabeculae with 2–4 longitudinal rows of autozooids arranged quincuncially. Fenestrae oval, longer than wide ( Fig. 8A View Fig ).
Autozooids ovoid, longer than wide, convex, separated by distinct raised sutures. Frontal shield smooth or finely rugose, with 2–4 areolae ( Fig. 8 View Fig C–D).
Primary orifice semi-elliptical, longer than wide, distal rim with 16–18 blunt, triangular denticles, proximal border with U-shaped sinus (wider than long) and flanked by smooth condyles, sloping towards the edges of the sinus ( Fig. 8B View Fig ).
Peristome thin, slightly raised on both sides of orifice ( Fig. 8C View Fig ). Autozooids with two oral spines (only the bases observed), one with thicker diameter ( Fig. 8B View Fig ). Giant avicularia on a large cystid (with 2 pores), in the middle of frontal plane, rostrum triangular with slightly concave margins and hooked tip, laterally directed, crossbar robust and without columella ( Fig. 8C View Fig ).
Ovicell typically globular, longer than wide, immersed with secondary calcification, surface smooth, imperforate, with large central fissure, widening at base, non-cleithral ( Fig. 8E View Fig ).
Abfrontal slightly granular, with large polygonal kenozooids separated by raised sutures. Two types of abfrontal avicularia, adventitious triangular, scattered around kenozooids, and giant avicularia typically located at base of fenestrae, triangular ( Fig. 8F View Fig ).
Remarks
Spines were not reported by Busk (1884) in the original description, but the study of his own material reveals the presence of the remaining holes. The giant abfrontal avicularium is rare in the material provided (syntypes); however, Busk (1884) already reported their presence, as did Waters (1895). Since no young or apical parts remain in the type material, it cannot be ascertained whether young zooids present the two triangular flaps characteristic of other nearer species (i.e., S. pungens , see Figs 9E View Fig , 10C View Fig ); thus, this difference could also be due to ontogenetic changes.
S. imperati (Busk) differs from S. pungens in:
– lacking oval adventitious avicularia both frontal and abfrontal
– the shape of abfrontal adventitious avicularia, triangular in S. imperati (Busk) ( Fig. 8F View Fig ) but oval or almond-shaped in S. pungens ( Fig. 10 View Fig E–F)
– in the shape of the peristome, thinner in S. imperati . Indeed, in the type material we did not observe the distinctively pointed lateral flaps characteristic of S. pungens ( Figs 9 View Fig C–D; 10C), though these were included in the original description ( Busk 1884), and it could be a character associated with young zooids
The abfrontal of S. imperati (Busk) is closer to that of S. aviculifera (as described here) as both have numerous triangular avicularia, but they differ on the rugosity of the surface ( Figs 7H View Fig , 8F View Fig ), being smoother in S. imperati (Busk) . They differ on the frontal face because of the presence of almond-like avicularia in S. aviculifera ( Fig. 7E View Fig ), always missing in S. imperati (Busk) ( Fig. 8 View Fig C–D).
N | MEAN | SD | MIN | MAX | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FL | 16 | 1508 | 299 | 1082 | 1949 |
FW | 25 | 703 | 167 | 350 | 1064 |
TW | 44 | 627 | 131 | 389 | 907 |
Nz | 19 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
AzL | 30 | 471 | 53 | 326 | 594 |
AzW | 25 | 323 | 36 | 271 | 408 |
OL | 15 | 108 | 8 | 96 | 124 |
OW | 14 | 86 | 5 | 78 | 98 |
ApL | 23 | 135 | 13 | 111 | 162 |
ApW | 28 | 104 | 9 | 87 | 126 |
VAL | 12 | 183 | 22 | 160 | 232 |
VAW | 20 | 109 | 17 | 71 | 136 |
OVL | 20 | 200 | 55 | 140 | 321 |
OVW | 13 | 168 | 35 | 130 | 261 |
AbAL | 40 | 146 | 18 | 100 | 180 |
AbAW | 41 | 67 | 10 | 45 | 90 |
Ns | 28 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Np | 58 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
Np_Ab | 36 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 12 |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Flustrina |
Family |
|
Genus |
Schizoretepora imperati ( Busk, 1884 )
Madurell, Teresa, Jones, Mary Spencer & Zabala, Mikel 2019 |
Retepora imperati
Busk G. 1884: 110 |
Schizellozoon imperati
Barroso M. G. 1935: 378 |
Canu & Bassler 1928: 49–50 |