Ninetis faro Huber
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2014.81 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AC69F89F-C11B-49B1-8EEE-183286EDA755 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6139676 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C0D5E7FB-BB45-4921-BCBE-75FC4197FF02 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:C0D5E7FB-BB45-4921-BCBE-75FC4197FF02 |
treatment provided by |
Jeremy (2017-07-17 12:01:28, last updated 2024-12-12 17:47:38) |
scientific name |
Ninetis faro Huber |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ninetis faro Huber View in CoL , sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:C0D5E7FB-BB45-4921-BCBE-75FC4197FF02
Figs 25 View Figs 25 - 26 , 53-62 View Figs 53 - 57 View Figs 58 - 62
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from most known congeners (especially from N. subtilissima Simon, 1890 which has a similar male palp) by shape of male cheliceral apophyses ( Figs 60-61 View Figs 58 - 62 ); from N. russellsmithi Huber, 2002 (which has similar male chelicerae) by shorter embolus and presence of procursus ( Figs 58-59 View Figs 58 - 62 ). From other species by shapes of bulbal projections (both projections of same length in N. toliara Huber & El Hennawy, 2007 ) or by shape of procursus (larger and not pointed in N. minuta (Berland, 1919) and N. namibiae Huber, 2000 ). Females are not easily distinguished (epigynum wider in N. namibiae , narrower in N. minuta ; similar in other species).
Etymology
The name is a noun in apposition, derived from the type locality.
Type material
Holotype ♂, in MRAC ( 221178 ) GoogleMaps .
Type locality
CAMEROON, North Region, Faro Game Reserve [8°24’N, 12°49’E], pitfall in gallery forest, 5 May 2007 (R. Jocqué, K. Loosveldt, L. Baert, M. Alderweireldt).
Other material examined
CAMEROON: North Region: 1 ♂ in MRAC ( 221178 ), same data as and together with holotype GoogleMaps ; 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀ (2 vials) in MRAC ( 221136, 221208 ), same data but pitfall in wooded savanna, 3-4 May 2007 GoogleMaps . 1 ♀ in MRAC ( 221401 ), same data but sieving in gallery forest, 17 Apr. 2007 GoogleMaps . 2 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀ in MRAC ( 221463 ), Hossere Gare [8°30’N, 13°08’E], sieving of litter among rocks, 4 May 2007 (Jocqué, Loosveldt, Baert, Alderweireldt) GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 1.2, carapace width 0.50. Leg 1: 2.96 (0.80 + 0.20 + 0.80 + 0.73 + 0.43), tibia 2: 0.67, tibia 3: 0.50, tibia 4: 0.80; tibia 1 L/d: 12. Distance PME-PME 35 µm, diameter PME 40 µm, distance PME-ALE 25 µm, diameter AME 20 µm, distance AME-AME 20 µm.
COLOR. Entire animal ochre-yellow to ochre-grey.
BODY. Habitus as in Figs 53-54 View Figs 53 - 57 ; ocular area not elevated; carapace without median furrow; clypeus more sclerotized at rim and medially slightly protruding; sternum about as wide as long (0.38/0.37), with distinct humps near leg coxae 1. Chelicerae as in Figs 60-61 View Figs 58 - 62 , with distinctive pair of frontal apophyses; with very fine stridulatory ridges.
PALPS. As in Figs 55-56 View Figs 53 - 57 and 58-59 View Figs 58 - 62 , coxa and trochanter unmodified, femur with small retrolatero-ventral apophysis, tarsus with small pointed procursus; bulb with long ventral process and short membranous dorsal embolus.
LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs, few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 67%; prolateral trichobothrium apparently absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 with ~6 pseudosegments.
VARIATION. Tibia 1 in 5 other males: 0.63-0.73 (mean 0.69).
Female
In general similar to male but clypeus, sternum, and chelicerae unmodified; tibia 1 in 5 females: 0.50- 0.60 (mean 0.53). Epigynum simple oval sclerotized area consisting of large anterior and smaller posterior plate; internal structures poorly visible through cuticle ( Fig. 57 View Figs 53 - 57 ); unclear if complex internal structures are part of anterior plate (as appears in dorsal view; Fig. 62 View Figs 58 - 62 ) or posterior plate (as appears in ventral view); anterior plate with transversal ridge apparently connected to median pocket. Pore plates not seen ( Fig. 62 View Figs 58 - 62 ).
Distribution
Known from two localities in the North Region of Cameroon ( Fig. 25 View Figs 25 - 26 ).
Huber B. A. 2000. New World pholcid spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae): a revision at generic level. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 254: 1 - 348. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1206 / 0003 - 0090 (2000) 254 <0001: NWPSAP> 3 E 2.0. CO; 2
Huber B. A. 2002. Ninetis russellsmithi n. sp., an unusual new pholcid spider species from Malawi (Araneae: Pholcidae). Journal of Insect Science 2.4: 1 - 3. http: // www. insectscience. org / 2.4 /
Huber B. A. & El Hennawy H. 2007. On Old World ninetine spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae), with a new genus and species and the first record for Madagascar. Zootaxa 1635: 45 - 53.
MRAC |
Belgium, Tervuren, Musee Royal de l'Afrique Centrale |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
1 (by jeremy, 2017-07-17 12:01:28)
2 (by ImsDioSync, 2018-02-23 14:35:35)
3 (by ImsDioSync, 2018-02-23 14:37:55)
4 (by ExternalLinkService, 2019-09-26 02:45:23)
5 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-01-30 06:49:35)
6 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-02-01 01:05:16)
7 (by ExternalLinkService, 2022-02-18 12:41:12)
8 (by plazi, 2023-10-27 22:01:36)
9 (by ExternalLinkService, 2023-10-28 04:16:38)
10 (by ExternalLinkService, 2024-11-29 10:49:39)
11 (by guilherme, 2024-12-12 16:15:57)