Pelecium cyanipes Kirby, 1817
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.922.2443 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CEE6866E-B1DD-4BF9-8461-FA99D0A9FE9A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10715328 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C9540-AB17-FF8D-9317-FBBA287CA1F8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pelecium cyanipes Kirby, 1817 |
status |
|
Pelecium cyanipes Kirby, 1817 View in CoL
Figs 7D–K View Fig , 14A–B View Fig , 20F View Fig , 21A View Fig , 26 View Fig
Specimens examined
BRAZIL • 6 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀; Rio de Janeiro, Teresópolis, Pq. Nac. Serra dos Orgãos ; Jan. 2014; R. Monteiro leg.; CAMB • 1 ♀; Rio de Janeiro; Nova Friburgo, Macaé de Cima ; 5 Nov. 2009; E.E & P. Grossi leg.; CERPE • 2 ♂♂; Minas Gerais, Alto Caparaó, PARNA Caparaó ; 5–6 Nov. 2016; A. Orsetti and S. Aloquio leg; Ativa/Noturna; CELC • 1 ♂; Minas Gerais, Alto Caparaó, PARNA Caparaó ; 6–10 Nov. 2016; A. Orsetti and S. Aloquio leg.; pitfall; CELC .
Notes
The new record is from the same biogeographical dominion, the South Brazilian dominion, but from the Madeira province, while the holotype is from the Rondônia province. In Straneo & Ball (1989) the authors synonymized four species ( P. cyanipes , P. carinatum , P. ovipenne and P. humeratum ) and divided P. cyanipes into four “morphs” ( cyanipes morph, carinatum morph, ovipenne morph and humeratum morph). All specimens of P. cyanipes examined by us fit in the humeratum “morph”. Comparing the examined specimens with photographs of the holotype of P. cyanipes and the “morph” descriptions, we noted morphological differences that are sufficient to question the aforementioned synonymies, such as body shape and head frontal fovea. However, in order to review the species limits, it is necessary to examine the holotypes of P. carinatum , P. ovipenne and P. humeratum .
Complementary description
ABDOMINAL TERGITE IX ( Fig. 7H View Fig ). Oval, asymmetrical, sides converging to anterior portion, forming long projection; left side more angulate them right side; inner anterior angle rounded, posterior portion rounded.
AEDEAGUS ( Fig. 7F–G, I–J View Fig ). With median lobe ( Fig. 7F–G View Fig ) cylindrical, asymmetrical, bent to left, slightly broadening apically; ostium short, confined to apical fourth; apical lamella long, apical edges narrow; basal bulb thin. Parameres ( Fig. 7I–J View Fig ) asymmetrical; left paramere elongate, posterior angle rounded; right paramere square, with protuberant rounded lateral angle.
GONOCOXITE 1 ( Fig. 7K View Fig ). Outer and inner sides arcuate; inner side forming acute projection on posterior margin; anterior margin dull.
GONOCOXITE 2 ( Fig. 7K View Fig ). Short; basal lobe bearing ensiform setae on each side; ensiform setae very short, with one-fifth to one-sixth the length of gonocoxite 2; slender setae at apex.
MEASUREMENTS (in mm). Males (n = 9): AL1 1.0–1.3 (1.11 ± 0.11), AL2 0.5–0.7 (0.62± 0.07), EL 7.7–9.7 (8.15 ± 0.66), EW 5.2–7.2 (5.80 ± 0.61), PL 4.3–5.7 (4.8 ± 0.48), PW 4.1–5.5 (4.67 ± 0.48), HL 2.2–2.6 (2.33 ± 0.17), HW 3.0–3.6 (3.23 ± 0.28), TL 14.3–18.0 (15.31 ± 1.17), TL/EW 2.5–2.8 (2.65± 0.11), lp2L 0.9–1.3 (1.04± 0.12), lp3L 0.9–1.2 (1.04± 0.09), lp3 W 0.5 –0.9 (0.71± 0.12), mp3L 0.4–0.5 (0.44 ± 0.05), mp4L 0.8–1.1 (0.93± 0,1), mp4 W 0.6 –1.0 (0.73± 0.14). Females (n = 4): AL1 1.1–1.4 (1.18 ± 0.15), AL2 0.6–0.8 (0.65 ± 0.1), EL 9.4–12.1 (10.18 ± 1.29), EW 6.2–6.6 (6.4± 0.18), PL 4.9–6.7 (5.4 ± 0.87), PW 3.2–6.5 (4.8 ± 1.35), HL 2.5–3.0 (2.73± 0.25), HW 3.3–3.4 (3.37 ± 0.06), TL 16.9–21.8 (18.63 ± 2.75), TL/EW 2.7–3.3 (2.92± 0.33), lp2L 0.9–1.1 (1.05± 0.1), lp3L 0.7–1.0 (0.88± 0.15), lp3 W 0.4 –0.6 (0.5± 0.08), mp3L 0.5–1.0 (0.55 ± 0.1), mp4L 0.9–1.2 (0.98 ± 0.15), mp4 W 0.5 –0.7 (0.55 ± 0.1).
CERPE |
CERPE |
CELC |
CELC |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |