Orcevia keyserlingi Thorell, 1890

Yu, Kun, Maddison, Wayne P. & Zhang, Junxia, 2023, Taxonomic revision of Orcevia Thorell, 1890, with description of fifteen new species (Araneae, Salticidae, Euophryini), Zootaxa 5384 (1), pp. 1-79 : 10

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5384.1.1
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0211978A-E124-4D9F-9A92-B565AA7B7891
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10376312
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038CA47F-726F-207B-C6B5-7BB09205F8B4
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Orcevia keyserlingi Thorell, 1890
status

Treatment

Orcevia keyserlingi Thorell, 1890 View in CoL (Ḿ氏ĸ尔¤)

Figs 123–131 View FIGURES 123–131 , 275, 283 View FIGURES 274–286

Orcevia keyserlingi Thorell, 1890: 166 View in CoL ; Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012: 50, figs 117–119, 124–126; Prószyński, 2017: 75; Prószyński, 2019: 122, figs 1I–J, M–N, R–S, 2D.

Laufeia keyserlingi ( Thorell, 1890) View in CoL : Simon, 1903: 824; Prószyński, 1984: 73–74, 76.

Type material. Syntypes: 1♂ 1♀ ( NHRS; NHRS-TOBI000005483~NHRS-TOBI000005484) & 2♀ ( MSNG), Indonesia: Sumatra, Singalang, 1878, leg. O. Beccari (Tobias Malm and Maria Tavano examined and shared the photos of syntypes) .

Diagnosis. Male resembles O. deelemanae sp. nov. and O. pakse sp. nov. in the relatively flat tip of RTA, but it can be distinguished from O. pakse by the relatively short RTA that does not extend beyond the tip of lobe-like protrusion of tegulum ( Fig. 129 View FIGURES 123–131 ), and can be distinguished from O. deelemanae by the gentler prolateral margin of embolic disc in ventral view ( Fig. 275 View FIGURES 274–286 ). Females can be distinguished from O. deelemanae sp. nov. by distance between atria is almost as long as diameter of atria ( Fig. 130 View FIGURES 123–131 ; vs. in O. deelemanae sp. nov. the distance between atria is ca. three times longer than diameter of atria).