Emys orbicularis ( Linnaeus, 1758:198 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/megataxa.7.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3BD32BFF-0402-47FB-A9EE-FE08E260793D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6328641 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038F8788-FFB6-FFDF-D973-F99CFC4726EF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Emys orbicularis ( Linnaeus, 1758:198 ) |
status |
|
Emys orbicularis ( Linnaeus, 1758:198) View in CoL
Holotype: Not located; originally in UPSZTY (= UUZM), but apparently lost; listed by Linné & Thunberg (1780:3) and Thunberg (1828:49), but not by Lönnberg (1896), Andersson (1900), Holm (1957), or Wallin (2001). MNMZ designated neotype by Fritz (1994:65).
Testudo lutaria Linnaeus 1758:198 View Cited Treatment
Holotype: Not located; originally in UPSZTY
(= UUZM), but apparently lost (listed by Thunberg 1828:49, but not by Lönnberg 1896, Andersson 1900, Holm 1957, or Wallin 2001).
Testudo terrestris Garsault 1764 :Pl. 675
Holotype: Not located; illustrated in the original description (Pl. 675).
Testudo europaea Schneider 1783:323
Holotype: Not located.
Testudo pulchella Schoepff 1801:113
Syntypes (at least 2): Not located; two syntypes illustrated in the original description (Pl. XXVI) .
Emys turfa t Meyer 1835:67
Syntypes (number uncertain): Not located; possibly in the SMNS (Kurek 1917) .
Clemmys schlotheimii t Fitzinger 1835:127
Syntypes (number uncertain): apparently MGN 1995 (multiple specimens), and 1672; MGN 1672 designated as lectotype by Karl & Paust (2014:156) and illustrated in the original description (Pl. 4, Fig. 4).
Trionyx schlotheimii t Fitzinger 1835:128
Syntypes (number uncertain): apparently MGN 1995 (multiple specimens), and 1673; MGN 1673 designated as lectotype by Karl & Paust (2014:156) and illustrated in the original description (Pl. 4, Fig. 1, 3).
Emys lutaria borealis t Nilsson 1841:208
Syntypes (2): NRM CU75037 and 75039 (formerly R1743-44); illustrated in Dalmon (1820:Pl. VI–VII), and in the original description (Pl. III– IV); see also Kurck (1917) and Sommer et al. (2009).
Testudo (Emys) canstadiensis t Plieninger 1847:208
Holotype: Not located; possibly SMNS; illustrated in Jäger (1861:191).
Emys pulchra Brandt in Gray 1873:22
Holotype: BMNH 1851.12 .9.6 ( Gray 1873:22).
Cistudo anhaltina t Giebel 1866a:1
Holotype: Not located; possibly MLUH; illustrated in the original description (Pl. I– II).
Emys lutaria taurica Mehnert 1890:537
Holotype: Not located; possibly MZUS; illustrated in the original description (Pl. XX).
Emys europaea sparsa Dürigen 1897:14
Holotype: Not designated; description based on the literature ( Fritz 1992); “type” illustrated in Schoepff (1792:Pl. 1) and Sturn (1828:Pl. III, Fig. c).
Emys europaea punctata Dürigen 1897:15
Holotype: Not designated; description based on the literature ( Fritz 1992); “type” illustrated in Sturm (1828:Pl. III, Fig. a, b).
Emys europaea concolor Dürigen 1897:15
Holotype: Not designated; description based on the literature ( Fritz 1992); “type” illustrated in Brandt & Ratzenburg (1829:Pl. XXI).
Emys orbicularis aralensis Nikolsky 1915:24
Syntypes (number uncertain): ZIN 70 designated lectotype by Fritz (1992:66; illustrated in the original description (Pl. III); reproduced by Fritz (1992:66).
Emys orbicularis luteofusca Fritz 1989:145
Holotype: SMNS 4615:1 ( Schlüter & Hallermann 1997:10;photographed in the original description, p. 146, Fig. 2a, and p. 148, Fig. 3); paratypes (4; all photographed in the original description, p. 146–147, Fig. 2), SMNS 4615:2, 5474, and 5493 ( Schlüter & Hallermann 1997:9); MTD 29137.
Emys orbicularis colchica Fritz 1994:61
Holotype: ZIN 9110 View Materials a (photographed in the original description, p. 69, Fig. 13); paratypes (5), MHNG 2006.57; SMF 51896; and ZIN 9110 View Materials b, 10829, and 11302.
Emys orbicularis eiselti Fritz, Baran, Budak, & Amthauer 1998:113
Holotype: NMW 18551:1; paratypes (3), NMW 18551:2 (photographed in Fritz 1989:Fig. 9); ZDEU 40/1972:1; and MTD 40468. All types photographed in the original description, p. 115, Fig. 7.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Cryptodira |
Family |
|
Genus |
Emys orbicularis ( Linnaeus, 1758:198 )
Iverson, John B. 2022 |
Emys orbicularis colchica
Fritz, U. & Gunther, R. 1994: 61 |
Emys orbicularis luteofusca
Fritz, U. 1989: 145 |
Emys pulchra
Gray, J. E. 1873: 22 |
Cistudo anhaltina
Giebel, C. G. 1866: 1 |
Testudo (Emys) canstadiensis t Plieninger 1847:208
Jager, G. von 1861: 191 |
Testudo europaea
Schneider, J. G. 1783: 323 |
Emys orbicularis ( Linnaeus, 1758:198 )
Linnaeus, C. 1758: 198 |