Luehea conwentzii Schumann (1886: 154)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.542.2.5 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6415984 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039287B9-FFD8-FFA5-FF43-F9AAFD57F82F |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Luehea conwentzii Schumann (1886: 154) |
| status |
|
Luehea conwentzii Schumann (1886: 154) View in CoL .
Type:— BRAZIL. Rio de Janeiro: “in collibus apricis”, 1832, Riedel 107 (lectotype, designated here, BR! [BR0000005491391] ; isolectotypes C! [C10019549]; E! [E00894822]; G! [G00357099]; K! [K000381835]; L! [L2352793]; M! [M0210184], [M0210185]; MEL! [ MEL2451387 ], [ MEL 2451388 ]; NY! [NY00415477]; P! [P02142945], [P02142946], [P02142947]; S! [S-R-11135], [S13-2361]; W! [W0002578]) . São Paulo: Campos da Bocaina , 27 September 1879, Glaziou 11795 (syntypes remaining C! [C10019550]; P! [P06663915]).
When describing L. conwentzii, Schumann (1886) cited two collections in the protologue, Riedel 107 and Glaziou 11795, which are syntypes, therefore, in accordance with Art. 9.3 of the ICN, it is maybe select a lectotype. Cunha (1985) designated Riedel 107 in LE as the type, but no specimen has ever been found in this herbarium (L. Averyanov, pers. comm.). For this reason, we herein designate Riedel 107 ( BR549139 View Materials ) as the lectotype by choosing the most complete and preserved specimen. Based on Cunha (1985) and the present study, the application of the name L. conwentzii is confirmed as an accepted species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.