Stenosagola Broun, 1921
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X-67.3.335 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03933A62-FFC5-760A-7629-A427542B681C |
treatment provided by |
Diego |
scientific name |
Stenosagola Broun, 1921 |
status |
|
Stenosagola Broun, 1921 View in CoL
Stenosagola Broun 1921: 504 View in CoL . Hudson 1923: 366, 1934: 184; Newton and Chandler 1989: 18; Klimaszewski et al. 1996: 147; Newton and Thayer 2005a; Nomura and Leschen 2006: 244.
Type Species. Stenosagola planiocula Broun View in CoL (designated by Newton and Chandler 1989: 18).
Diagnosis. Species of Stenosagola are polymorphic with three primary phenotypes: winged males; wingless males; and wingless females. Winged females have not been documented. Winged male specimens have longer antennomeres ( Figs. 2a View Fig , 8a View Fig ), larger eyes ( Figs. 2d View Fig , 8d View Fig ), longer elytra ( Figs. 2k View Fig , 8i View Fig ), fully developed hind wings, longer meso- and metaventrites ( Figs. 2m View Fig , 8h View Fig ), and abdominal tergite IV bearing a pair of transverse patches of microtrichia ( Figs. 2p View Fig , 8k View Fig ). Wingless males have intermediate sized antennomeres ( Figs. 2b View Fig , 8b View Fig ) and eyes ( Figs. 2e View Fig , 8e View Fig ), hind wings reduced to small pads, shorter meso- and metaventrites ( Figs. 2m, 2h View Fig ), and abdominal tergite IV lacking transverse patches of microtrichia ( Figs. 2q View Fig , 8l View Fig ). Females have more transverse antennomeres ( Figs. 2c View Fig , 8c View Fig ), smaller eyes ( Figs. 2f View Fig , 8f View Fig ) and elytra ( Figs. 2l View Fig , 8j View Fig ), hind wings, meso- and metaventrites ( Fig. 2m, h View Fig ), and abdominal tergite IV ( Figs. 2q View Fig , 8l View Fig ) similar to those of wingless males.
The members of Stenosagola may be separated from other faronite genera by the following combination of characters: smaller size, antennae, when bent posteriorly, reaching midpoint of prothorax, antennomere 5 larger than 6, 6–10 transverse, 7–10 weakly clavate ( Figs. 2a–c View Fig ; 8a–c View Fig ); head with frontal sulcus broad and open anteriorly ( Figs. 2d–f View Fig , 4e View Fig ) or cylindrical and closed anteriorly ( Figs. 8d–f View Fig , 10g View Fig , 12g View Fig ); eyes largest in winged males ( Figs. 2d View Fig , 8d View Fig ), smaller in wingless males ( Figs. 2e View Fig , 4e View Fig , 8e View Fig , 10g View Fig ), and smallest in females ( Figs. 2f View Fig , 8f View Fig , 12g View Fig ); scutellum inverted-triangular, two setae present on posterior area ( Fig. 2j View Fig ); elytra longer than wide in winged males ( Figs. 2k View Fig , 8i View Fig ), as long as wide in wingless males and females ( Figs. 2l View Fig , 8j View Fig ); meso- and metaventrites with lateral mesocoxal foveae and lateral metaventral foveae ( Figs. 2m View Fig , 8h View Fig ); abdominal tergite IV with a pair of transverse patches of microtrichia in winged males ( Figs. 2p View Fig , 8k View Fig ; arrow), absent in wingless males and females ( Figs. 2q View Fig , 8l View Fig ; arrow); tergite and ventrite VI larger than V and VII ( Figs. 2p–q View Fig , 8k–l View Fig ).
KEY TO THE SPECIES OF THE GENUS STENOSAGOLA View in CoL
The key is mainly based on male specimens because most female specimens are indistinguishable based on external morphology.
1. Head with broad frontal sulcus open anteriorly ( Figs. 2d–f View Fig , 4e View Fig ); mesoventrites without promesocoxal foveae ( Fig. 2m View Fig ); body larger, 1.4–1.8 mm ( Fig. 1 View Fig ) ( gracilis View in CoL group) .................................................................2
1′. Head with elongate frontal sulcus closed anteriorly ( Figs. 8d–f View Fig , 10g View Fig , 12g View Fig ); prosternum as long as wide ( Fig. 8g View Fig ); mesoventrites with promesocoxal foveae ( Fig. 8h View Fig ); body small, 1.1–1.5 mm ( Figs. 6–7 View Fig View Fig ) ( connata View in CoL group)........................................................... 9
2(1). Head dull dorsally ( Fig. 1h–i, p View Fig ); pronotum as long as wide ( Fig. 1h–i, p View Fig )..................3
2′. Head glossy dorsally ( Fig. 1a–g, j–o View Fig ); pronotum longer than wide ( Fig. 1a–g, j–o View Fig ) ..................................................................... 4
3(2). Dorsal margin of male profemur depressed basally ( Fig. 4g View Fig , arrow); left apical lobe of male genitalia acute, longer than right apical lobe, right apical lobe folded over left ( Fig. 4c View Fig ); recorded only from Egmont National Park , Taranaki (TK, Fig. 5 View Fig : black circle)............ S. egmontensis View in CoL , new species
3′. Dorsal margin of male profemur lacking depression at base; apical lobe of male genitalia with two branches; major lobe bifid apically, minor lobe divided from ventral base of main lobe, longer and slender ( Fig. 4j View Fig ); recorded only from Stewart Island (SI, Fig. 5 View Fig : white square) ........... ................. S. stewartensis View in CoL , new species
4(2′). Apical lobe of male genitalia not bifid ( Fig. 4i View Fig ); recorded only from Fiordland (FD, Fig. 5 View Fig : black star) ............................. ............................... S. eylesi View in CoL , new species
4′. Apical lobe of male genitalia bifid ( Figs. 2s View Fig , 4a–d, h View Fig ); recorded from mid- and southern part of North Island and northern part of South Island.................................................5
5(4′). Minor apical lobe divided from ventral base of main lobe, longer and more slender ( Fig. 4h View Fig ); recorded only from Nelson (NN, Fig. 5 View Fig white circle)........................................ ........................ S. domettensis View in CoL , new species
5′. Apical lobe of male genitalia bifid laterally, length and width variable ( Figs. 2s View Fig , 4a–d View Fig )........................................................6
6(5′). Right paramere broader than left ( Fig. 4b View Fig ); left apical lobe long and slender ( Fig. 4b View Fig ); recorded only from Nelson (NN, Fig. 5 View Fig : black triangle) ..... S. clarkei View in CoL , new species
6′. Left paramere broader or as wide as right ( Fig. 2s View Fig , 4a, d View Fig ); left apical lobe shorter than right ( Figs. 2s View Fig , 4a, d View Fig )......................7
7(6′). Left apical lobe of male genitalia as wide as right ( Fig. 4d View Fig ); recorded only from Wellington (WN, Fig. 4 View Fig : black squares) .... ............................. S. ramsayi View in CoL , new species
7′. Left apical lobe of male genitalia narrower than right ( Figs. 2s View Fig , 4a View Fig )..........................8
8(7′). Right apical lobe of male genitalia broader than left, bent to left ( Fig. 2s View Fig ) .................. ................................... S. gracilis (Broun) View in CoL
8′. Right apical lobe of male genitalia as wide as left, not bent ( Fig. 4a View Fig )............................ .................. S. pseudogracilis View in CoL , new species
9(1′). Apical lobe of male genitalia bifid or branched ( Fig. 10b–d View Fig ).........................10
9′. Apical lobe of male genitalia simple ( Figs. 8p View Fig , 10a, e–f View Fig , 2a–f View Fig ).....................12
10(9). Left apical lobe of male genitalia longer than right ( Fig. 10d View Fig ); recorded from mid-western part of North Island ( Fig. 11 View Fig , circles) ................ S. dugdalei View in CoL , new species
10′. Right apical lobe of male genitalia longer than left ( Fig. 10b–c View Fig ); recorded from northern part of North Island ( Figs. 9 View Fig : squares, 11: triangles) ........................... 11
11(10′). Right apical lobe of male genitalia with small process at right base ( Fig. 10b View Fig ); recorded only from Northland (ND, Fig. 9 View Fig : square)....... S. northlandensis View in CoL , new species
11′. Right apical lobe of male genitalia without small process at base ( Fig. 10b View Fig ); recorded only from Auckland (AK) and Coromandel (CL) ( Fig. 11 View Fig , triangle) ....... ......................... S. thayerae View in CoL , new species
12(9′). Apical lobe of male genitalia long and slender ( Figs. 10e–f View Fig , 12b, f View Fig ) ................13
12′. Apical lobe of male genitalia broad ( Figs. 8p View Fig , 10a View Fig , 12a, c–e View Fig ) .................... 16
13(12). Head of wingless male circular ( Fig. 10g View Fig ); apical lobe of male genitalia broadly bent to right, weakly bulbous apically ( Fig. 10f View Fig ) ...................... S. haunuiensis View in CoL , new species
13′. Head of wingless male rectangular ( Fig. 8e View Fig ); apical lobe of male genitalia straight ( Figs. 10e View Fig , 12b, f View Fig ) ................................. 14
14(13′). Frontal rostral lobe of female head simple ( Fig. 8f View Fig ); apical lobe of male genitalia modified at tip ( Fig. 10e View Fig ); recorded only from Wellington (WN, Fig. 11 View Fig : square) .............. S. tararuaensis View in CoL , new species
14′. Frontal rostral lobe of female head with a pair of blunt processes with setae present ( Fig. 12g View Fig ); apical lobe of male genitalia simple ( Figs. 12b, f View Fig ); recorded from South Island ( Figs. 13 View Fig : square, 14: white square) ............................................................15
15(14′). Apical lobe of male genitalia extremely long and slender, 3 times broader than paramere ( Fig. 12b View Fig ) .................................. ........................ S. chandleri View in CoL , new species
15′. Apical lobe of male genitalia long and slender, 2 times broader than paramere ( Fig. 12f View Fig ) ..... S. fiordlandensis View in CoL , new species
16(12′). Median lobe of male genitalia at least 4 times broader than paramere ( Figs. 12c–d View Fig ) ................................................................... 17
16′. Median lobe of male genitalia approximately 3 times broader than paramere ( Figs. 8p View Fig , 10a View Fig , 12a, b View Fig )..........................18
17(16). Frontal rostral lobe of female head simple ( Fig. 8f View Fig ); apical lobe of male genitalia acute anteriorly, bent to right ( Fig. 12d View Fig ); recorded only from Mid Canterbury (MC) and Buller (BR) ( Fig. 14 View Fig : circle) ............. ........................... S. newtoni View in CoL , new species
17′. Frontal rostral lobe of female head with a pair of processes with setae present ( Fig. 12g View Fig ); apical lobe of male genitalia not acute or bent at tip ( Fig. 12c View Fig ); recorded from southern part of South Island ( Fig. 14 View Fig , triangles) ................... S. nunni View in CoL , new species
18(16′). Apical lobe of male genitalia emarginate ( Fig. 12e View Fig ).......... S. butcheri View in CoL , new species
18′. Apical lobe of male genitalia not emarginate ( Figs. 8p View Fig , 10a View Fig , 12a View Fig )....................19
19(18′). Apical lobe of male genitalia emarginate at tip ( Fig. 10a View Fig ) ..... S. huiaensis View in CoL , new species
19′. Apical lobe of male genitalia simple at tip ( Figs. 8p View Fig , 12a View Fig ).......................................20
20(19′). Apical lobe of male directly bent from main body ( Fig. 8p View Fig ); recorded from middle of North Island ( Fig. 9 View Fig , triangles) .............. ............................... S. connata (Broun) View in CoL
20′. Apical lobe of male genitalia bent from narrow neck shaped structure ( Fig. 12a View Fig ); recorded from southern part of North Island ( Fig. 13 View Fig , triangles)........................ ............. S. pseudoconnata View in CoL , new species
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Stenosagola Broun, 1921
Park, J. - S. & Carlton, C. E. 2013 |
Stenosagola
Klimaszewski 1996: 147 |
Hudson 1934: 184 |
Hudson 1923: 366 |
Broun 1921: 504 |