Stenaelurillus glaber Wesołowska & Russell-Smith, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2018.430 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5902A879-CD11-4CC3-A802-7C0D2F8059BE |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3793749 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039487C1-1656-7760-FE1B-2E8A5353FCBE |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Stenaelurillus glaber Wesołowska & Russell-Smith, 2011 |
status |
|
Stenaelurillus glaber Wesołowska & Russell-Smith, 2011 View in CoL
Figs 156–164 View Figs 156–164 , 511
Stenaelurillus glaber Wesołowska & Russell-Smith, 2011: 593 View in CoL , figs 151–152, 238–240 (D♂); ♂ holotype in BMNH, examined.
Diagnosis
By the conformation of the copulatory organs ( Figs 156–160 View Figs 156–164 ), the males of S. glaber are almost identical to those of S. hirsutus ( Figs 239–242 View Figs 239–245 , 246–251 View Figs 246–251 ), S. pilosus ( Figs 406–410 View Figs 406–412 ) and S. striolatus ( Figs 463– 467 View Figs 463–471 ). Males of all these species can easily be distinguished by the clypeal colour pattern: yellow clypeus with long sparse white hairs in S. glaber ( Fig. 161 View Figs 156–164 ), black with three vertical white stripes in S. hirsutus ( Fig. 255 View Figs 252–257 ), with a transverse dark brown band in S. pilosus ( Fig. 413 View Figs 413–416 ), and entirely dark brown/black in S. striolatus ( Fig. 468 View Figs 463–471 ). The shape of the distal projection (DP) of the functional tegulum also seems to be diagnostic (compare Fig. 156 View Figs 156–164 with Figs 246 View Figs 246–251 , 406 View Figs 406–412 , 463 View Figs 463–471 ). The female of S. glaber has not been described yet and cannot be diagnosed now.
Material examined
Holotype
NIGERIA: ♂, Kwara State, Mokwa , 9°17′34.1″ N, 5°03′16.8″ E, cultivated savanna, in dead leaves, 13 Jul. 1974, A. Russell-Smith leg. ( BMNH). GoogleMaps
Paratype
NIGERIA: 1 ♂, same collecting data as for holotype ( BMNH).
Description
Male (holotype)
Measurements: carapace: 2.55 long, 1.75 wide, 1.30 high. Abdomen: 2.05 long, 1.40 wide. Ocular area: 1.18 long, 1.60 wide anteriorly, 1.56 wide posteriorly. Cheliceral length 0.50. Clypeal height 0.20. Diameter of AME 0.50. Length of leg segments: I 1.28 + 0.70 + 0.75 + 0.60 + 0.53 (3.86); II 1.30 + 0.63 + 0.75 + 0.58 + 0.50 (3.76); III 1.95 + 0.90 + 1.25 + 1.40 + 0.58 (4.08); IV 1.68 + 0.70 + 1.13 + 1.38 + 0.60 (5.49). Leg formula IV,III,I,II. Leg spination: I: Fm d 0-1-1-5; Pt pr 0-1-0; Tb pr 1-1, v 1-2- 2ap; Mt pr and rt 1ap, v 2-2ap. II: Fm d 0-1-2-5; Pt pr 0-1-0; Tb pr 1-1-1, rt 0-1-1, v 1-1-2ap; Mt pr and rt 1-1ap, v 2-2ap. III: Fm d 0-1-2-4; Pt pr and rt 0-1-0; Tb d 1-0-0, pr 1-1-1-1, rt 1-1-1, v 1-0-2ap; Mt d 1-0-0, pr and rt 1-0-2ap, v 0-2-2ap. IV: Fm d 0-1-1-4; Pt pr and rt 0-1-0; Tb d 1-0-0, pr and rt 1-1-1, v 1-0-2ap; Mt d 1-0-0, pr and rt 1-1-2ap, v 0-2-2ap. Coloration (in alcohol; Figs 161–164 View Figs 156–164 ). Carapace yellowish brown, densely covered with recumbent brown scales, with two pairs (dorsal and marginal) of wide longitudinal white stripes of recumbent scales. Eye field dark brown, with numerous short protruding brown bristles. Clypeus brownish yellow, sparsely covered with long white hairs. Eyes of the first row are ventrally edged by dense white hairs and scales. Sternum, labium, endites and chelicerae yellow. Abdomen: dorsum dark brown, with three large white spots on its rear half; sides and venter greyish yellow. Book-lung covers yellow. Spinnerets brown. Legs yellow, but all Fm dorso-distally with patches of brown recumbent scales. Palps entirely yellow. Palpal structure as in Figs 156–160 View Figs 156–164 : VTA bulge-shaped, poorly marked; RTA straight, stiletto-shaped, directed anteriad, with a wide base; the cymbial lateral process (CLP) absent; the tegulum small, with a short, cone-shaped tegular process (TP); the functional tegulum swollen, with well-developed proximal (PP) and distal (DP) projections; the embolus short, ribbon-shaped, with a wide round base.
Female
Unknown.
Distribution
The type locality only ( Fig. 511 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Stenaelurillus glaber Wesołowska & Russell-Smith, 2011
Logunov, Dmitri V. & Azarkina, Galina N. 2018 |
Stenaelurillus glaber Wesołowska & Russell-Smith, 2011: 593
Wesolowska W. & Russell-Smith A. 2011: 593 |