Haemaphysalis warburtoni Nuttall, 1912
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5251.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3326BF76-A2FB-4244-BA4C-D0AF81F55637 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7718241 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03966A56-0F0E-C70E-BABF-8A85B181FC4D |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Haemaphysalis warburtoni Nuttall, 1912 |
status |
|
173. Haemaphysalis warburtoni Nuttall, 1912 View in CoL .
Oriental: 1) China (south), 2) Nepal (south and central); Palearctic: 1) China (north), 2) Nepal (north and central) (Hoogstraal 1971 c, Kolonin 2009, Chen et al. 2010, Zhao et al. 2021).
The range of Haemaphysalis warburtoni is unclear. Hoogstraal (1966b), Robbins (2005) and Guglielmone & Robbins (2018) listed it as present in China, India and Nepal. However, Hoogstraal (1971c) stated that Indian specimens do not belong to Haemaphysalis warburtoni , and India is not included within this species’ range in Hoogstraal & Kim (1985). Geevarghese & Mishra (2011) have continued to regard this tick as found in India, but their opinion is based on references published before the study of Hoogstraal (1971c); therefore, we exclude India from the range of Haemaphysalis warburtoni . A Taiwanese record of one specimen of alleged Haemaphysalis warburtoni corresponds in fact to Haemaphysalis formosensis , as explained in Robbins (2005).
The morphology of Haemaphysalis warburtoni is variable, as discussed in Hoogstraal (1971c), and more than one species may exist under this name.
See also Haemaphysalis pospelovashtromae for its confusion with Haemaphysalis warburtoni .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |