Haemaphysalis concinna Koch, 1844a

Guglielmone, Alberto A., Nava, Santiago & Robbins, Richard G., 2023, Geographic distribution of the hard ticks (Acari: Ixodida: Ixodidae) of the world by countries and territories, Zootaxa 5251 (1), pp. 1-274 : 82

33. Haemaphysalis concinna Koch, 1844a .

Oriental: 1) China (south); Palearctic: 1) Armenia, 2) Austria, 3) Azerbaijan, 4) Belarus, 5) Bosnia and Herzegovina, 6) Bulgaria, 7) China (north), 8) Croatia, 9) Czechia, 10) France, 11) Georgia, 12) Germany, 13) Greece, 14) Hungary, 15) Iran, 16) Italy, 17) Japan (except the Ryukyu Islands), 18) Kazakhstan, 19) Kyrgyzstan, 20) Lithuania, 21) Moldova, 22) Mongolia, 23) North Korea, 24) Poland, 25) Romania, 26) Russia, 27) Serbia, 28) Slovakia, 29) South Korea, 30) Spain, 31) Turkey, 32) Ukraine, 33) Uzbekistan ( Feider 1965, Nosek 1971, Yamaguti et al. 1971, Filippova 1997, Morel 2003, Cringoli et al. 2005, Rasulov 2007, Kiefer et al. 2010, Bursali et al. 2012, Krčmar 2012, Nowak-Chmura & Siuda 2012, Petney et al. 2012, Estrada-Peña et al. 2017, Fedorova 2017, Rubel et al. 2018, 2021, Černý, J. et al. 2019, Hosseini-Chegeni et al. 2019, Zheng, G. et al. 2019, Hornok et al. 2020 a, Karbowiak et al. 2020, Paulauskas et al. 2020, Perfilyeva et al. 2020, Tsapko 2020, Li et al. 2022, Rubel & Brugger 2022).

Chen et al. (2010) and Zhang, Y.K. et al. (2019) did not include southern China within the geographic distribution of Haemaphysalis concinna , but such records are recognized in Zhang, G. et al. (2019) and Zhao et al. (2021), and China (south) is provisionally included within the range of this tick. The presence of this tick in North and South Korea is based on Yamaguti et al. (1971), while records from Uzbekistan appear in Rasulov (2007). Haemaphysalis concinna is provisionally considered present in all three of these countries.