Prionospio corrugata, Peixoto & Paiva, 2020

Peixoto, Antônio João Malafaia & Paiva, Paulo Cesar, 2020, New apinnate Prionospio (Annelida: Spionidae) species from southeastern Brazil, Zootaxa 4853 (4), pp. 451-508 : 483-486

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4853.4.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A769E18C-F82A-4356-B81F-228308CFDDC3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4410933

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687A2-3924-C256-F897-6C4EFB2AEA0D

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Prionospio corrugata
status

sp. nov.

Prionospio corrugata View in CoL sp. nov.

( Figures 20–22 View FIGURE 20 View FIGURE 21 View FIGURE 22 )

Type material. Brazil. Espírito Santo Basin. Holotype: Amb 5 B5, 20º 35’ 15.16” S, 39º 53’ 46.36” W, 02 Dec 2011 to 02 Feb 2012, 991m, MNRJ-2764. GoogleMaps Paratypes: Amb11 C5, 20º 14’ 19.79” S, 39º 48’ 36.57” W, 06 Jul 2013 to 17 Jul 2013, 418m, MNRJP-2765 (5 ind); GoogleMaps Amb5 B6, 20º 36’ 2.03” S, 39º 51’ 35.37” W, 02 Dec 2011 to 02 Feb 2012, 991m, MNRJP-2766 (4 ind); GoogleMaps Amb12 D6, 19º 50’ 6.01” S, 39º 26’ 34.62” W, 02 Dec 2011 to 02 Feb 2012, 1048m, MNRJP-2767 (10 ind) GoogleMaps .

Additional material examined. Amb3 E5, 19º 36’ 25.08” S, 39º 10’ 20.15” W, 352m (19 ind); GoogleMaps Amb3 E6, 19º 40’ 13.13” S, 39º 7’ 20.92” W, 1010m (27 ind); GoogleMaps Amb3 F5, 19º 34’ 21.01” S, 38º 41’ 16.99” W, 438m (1 ind); GoogleMaps Amb3 CAND4 , 19º 31’ 51.13” S, 39º 3’ 4.99” W, 140m (1 ind); GoogleMaps Amb3 CAND5 , 19º 33’ 20.99” S, 39º 2’ 36.2” W, 384m (34 ind); GoogleMaps Amb3 CAND7 , 19º 42’ 20.31” S, 39º 5’ 55.46” W, 1289m (1 ind); GoogleMaps Amb4 B8, 20º 41’ 33.45” S, 39º 35’ 14.76” W, 1902m (1 ind); GoogleMaps Amb4 F7, 20º 4’ 8.18” S, 38º 31’ 27.32” W, 1288m (7 ind); GoogleMaps Amb5 A5, 21º 4’ 5.57” S, 40º 13’ 2.63” W, 396m (49 ind); GoogleMaps Amb5 A6, 21º 4’ 43.84” S, 40º 8’ 31.76” W, 990m (26 ind); GoogleMaps Amb5 A7, 21º 4’ 51.67” S, 40º 4’ 14.88” W, 1316m (16 ind); GoogleMaps Amb5 B5, 20º 35’ 15.16” S, 39º 53’ 46.36” W, 382m (5 ind); GoogleMaps Amb5 B6, 20º 36’ 2.03” S, 39º 51’ 35.37” W, 991m (43 ind); GoogleMaps Amb5 B7, 20º 36’ 47.44” S, 39º 49’ 22.5” W, 1315m (18 ind); GoogleMaps Amb5 C5, 20º 14’ 19.45” S, 39º 48’ 36.67” W, 416m (5 ind); GoogleMaps Amb5 C6, 20º 15’ 34.21” S, 39º 46’ 15.69” W, 1031m (24 ind); GoogleMaps Amb5 C7, 20º 15’ 39.85” S, 39º 46’ 10.03” W, 1309m (15 ind); GoogleMaps Amb5 D6, 19º 50’ 4.42” S, 39º 26’ 33.42” W, 1053m (23 ind); GoogleMaps Amb5 D7, 19º 54’ 5.01” S, 39º 22’ 20.04” W, 1333m (12 ind); GoogleMaps Amb5 D8, 20º 8’ 42.11” S, 39º 7’ 29.06” W, 1905m (1 ind); GoogleMaps Amb6 D5, 19º 46’ 32.67” S, 39º 30’ 3.54” W, 402m (36 ind); GoogleMaps Amb6 E4, 19º 36’ 5.17” S, 39º 10’ 32.93” W, 145m (1 ind); GoogleMaps Amb6 CANWN5 , 19º 49’ 38.59” S, 39º 35’ 44.43” W, 352m (68 ind); GoogleMaps Amb6 CANWN6 , 19º 53’ 29.3” S, 39º 32’ 59.04” W, 955m (7 ind); GoogleMaps Amb6 CANWN7 , 19º 58’ 13.68” S, 39º 31’ 43.28” W, 1284m (4 ind); GoogleMaps Amb8 E7, 19º 47’ 5.96” S, 39º 3’ 11.96” W, 1223m (4 ind); GoogleMaps Amb8 G6, 19º 3’ 32.9” S, 37º 49’ 4.82” W, 1011m (1 ind); GoogleMaps Amb8 G7, 19º 3’ 30.21” S, 37º 48’ 42.41” W, 1245m (2 ind); GoogleMaps Amb11 A5, 21º 4’ 8.5” S, 40º 13’ 7.35” W, 383m (43 ind); GoogleMaps Amb11 A6, 21º 4’ 43.95” S, 40º 8’ 34.11” W, 997m (18 ind); GoogleMaps Amb11 A7, 21º 4’ 40.63” S, 40º 4’ 10.65” W, 1331m (8 ind); GoogleMaps Amb11 B5, 20º 35’ 13.87” S, 39º 53’ 45.78” W, 382m (7 ind); GoogleMaps Amb11 B6, 20º 35’ 57.27” S, 39º 51’ 38.12” W, 994m (29 ind); GoogleMaps Amb11 B7, 20º 36’ 49.74” S, 39º 49’ 29.01” W, 1327m (13 ind); GoogleMaps Amb11 C5, 20º 14’ 17.95” S, 39º 48’ 34.35” W, 418m (3 ind); GoogleMaps Amb11 C6, 20º 15’ 32.22” S, 39º 46’ 9.28” W, 1029m (17 ind); GoogleMaps Amb11 C7, 20º 17’ 39.63” S, 39º 42’ 38.76” W, 1347m (16 ind); GoogleMaps Amb12 D5, 19º 46’ 32.84” S, 39º 30’ 3.65” W, 431m (18 ind); GoogleMaps Amb12 D6, 19º 50’ 6.01” S, 39º 26’ 34.62” W, 1048m (34 ind); GoogleMaps Amb12 D7, 19º 54’ 5.24” S, 39º 22’ 28.64” W, 1330m (1 ind); GoogleMaps Amb12 E5, 19º 36’ 30.6” S, 39º 10’ 19.39” W, 349m (10 ind); GoogleMaps Amb12 E6, 19º 40’ 1.46” S, 39º 7’ 21.99” W, 1018m (20 ind); GoogleMaps Amb12 E7, 19º 47’ 2.24” S, 39º 3’ 13.72” W, 1242m (8 ind); GoogleMaps Amb11 E8, 20º 15’ 53.31” S, 38º 40’ 53.51” W, 1886m (9 ind); GoogleMaps Amb12 G7, 19º 3’ 31.11” S, 37º 48’ 42.65” W, 1361m (1 ind); GoogleMaps Amb12 CAND5 , 19º 33’ 23.09” S, 39º 2’ 35.67” W, 446m (12 ind); GoogleMaps Amb12 CAND6 , 19º 37’ 46.26” S, 39º 3’ 59.65” W, 1036m (4 ind); GoogleMaps Amb12 CANWN5 , 19º 49’ 36.67” S, 39º 35’ 43.43” W, 363m (38 ind); GoogleMaps Amb12 CANWN6 , 19º 53’ 27.27” S, 39º 32’ 59.82” W, 960m (7 ind); GoogleMaps Amb12 CANWN7 , 19º 58’ 12.82” S, 39º 31’ 42.22” W, 1305m (15 ind) GoogleMaps .

Diagnostic features: Three rows of capillary chaetae on notopodia from chaetiger 2 to chaetigers 10–12; neuropodium of chaetiger 3 bearing very long chaetae on posterior row; sculptured branchiae on chaetigers 2 and 5–7, pygidium bearing a single dorsal cirrus.

Description. A medium-sized Prionospio , largest complete specimen 6 mm long, 0.5 mm wide at the widest part for 91 chaetigers; holotype complete, 5.5 mm long, 0.40 mm wide at widest part for 74 chaetigers. Body widest and dorsoventrally flattened in branchial region, cylindrical afterwards, tapering towards pygidium. Body color yellow to whitish in alcohol ( Fig. 20 View FIGURE 20 ).

Prostomium rectangular, narrow, truncated on anterior margin, extending posteriorly as a narrow keel reaching anterior margin of chaetiger 2 ( Figs 20 View FIGURE 20 ; 21 View FIGURE 21 A–B). Small prostomial peaks might be present. Eyes absent. Peristomium surrounding prostomium and partially fused to chaetiger 1, lacking lateral wings. Grooved palps reaching up to chaetiger 10, lost in most specimens.

Chaetiger 1 with only a few chaetae in both rami, especially in notopodium, shorter than chaetae on succeeding chaetigers. Postchaetal lamellae elliptical in notopodium and rounded in neuropodium. ( Figs 21B View FIGURE 21 ; 22A View FIGURE 22 ). Prechaetal lamellae absent.

Notopodial postchaetal lamellae foliaceous on chaetigers 2–7 ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 B–D), square-shaped on chaetigers 8 and 9 (largest on chaetiger 8) and rounded afterwards, gradually reduced in size towards posterior region, present as a low flap on last chaetigers. Notopodial prechaetal lamellae absent throughout. Low dorsal crests from chaetigers 8–9 to chaetigers 14–15 ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 A–B).

Neuropodial postchaetal lamellae elliptical on chaetigers 2–4 ( Figs 21C View FIGURE 21 ; 22 View FIGURE 22 B–D), with a pointed tip on dorsal edge of chaetiger 3. Lamellae rounded from chaetiger 5, gradually reduced in size towards posterior region, present as a low flap on last chaetigers. Neuropodial prechaetal lamellae absent throughout.

Chaetae from notopodia ( Fig. 22E View FIGURE 22 ) and neuropodia ( Fig. 22F View FIGURE 22 ) narrowly unilimbate, non-granulated capillaries, organized in three rows on notopodia from chaetiger 2 to chaetigers 10–12 and two rows in neuropodia and remaining notopodial chaetigers. Chaetae from each row of different lengths, anterior row shortest. Neuropodial chaetae slightly shorter than notopodial chaetae. Neuropodium of chaetiger 3 bearing very long chaetae in posterior row (up to four times longer than anterior row). Towards posterior region, capillaries progressively become elongate, nonlimbate, thinner and less numerous ( Fig. 22G View FIGURE 22 ).

Hooks in notopodia starting from chaetigers 22–44, up to five per fascicle, accompanied by 1–4 short non-limbate capillaries ( Fig. 22H View FIGURE 22 ). Hooks in neuropodia starting from chaetigers 10–12, up to 12 per fascicle, accompanied by 1–6 short non-limbate capillaries. All hooks multidentate, with eight secondary teeth organized in two vertical rows above main tooth ( Figs 21D View FIGURE 21 ; 22I View FIGURE 22 ). Small secondary hood present ( Fig. 22I View FIGURE 22 ). Sabre chaetae starting from chaetigers 10–17, being morphologically identical to remaining capillaries—albeit shorter, only recognizable by a slight curvature and by ventral-most position ( Fig. 22J View FIGURE 22 ).

Up to six pairs of branchiae, subtriangular, robust and flattened on chaetigers 3 and 4 and cirriform, sculptured (“wrinkled”) on remaining chaetigers, all tapered at tips ( Fig. 22 View FIGURE 22 K–L). Branchiae present from chaetiger 2, up to three times longer than notopodial lamellae, slightly reduced in length towards last branchial pair. Branchiae on chaetigers 3 and 4 heavily ciliated throughout, branchiae on remaining chaetigers ciliated at base. All branchiae completely free from notopodial postchaetal lamellae ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 A–B).

Pygidium rounded, bearing a single long dorsal cirrus ( Fig. 22M View FIGURE 22 ).

Gametes not observed.

Variation: In juveniles (up to 2.5 mm long), the prostomium is square-shaped, rather than rectangular.

Methyl green staining pattern: Prostomium, lateral and ventral sides of the peristomium, postchaetal neuropodial lamellae from chaetigers 2–6, postchaetal notopodial lamellae from chaetiger 2 to chaetigers 12–15 and dorsal crests intensely stained; tips of the last branchial pair slightly stained.

Remarks. Prionospio corrugata sp. nov. is easily recognizable among Brazilian apinnate Prionospio species by its set of characters: a rectangular prostomium, sculptured branchiae (except on chaetigers 2 and 3), three rows of capillary chaetae on notopodia from chaetiger 2 to chaetigers 10–12, row of long neurochaetae on chaetiger three and pygidium bearing a single dorsal cirrus.

The narrow rectangular prostomium is most similar to P. ehlersi Fauvel, 1928 , described from Morocco, P. kaplani , P. amarsupiata Neal & Altamira in Paterson et al., 2016 , described from Portugal and P. branchilucida Altamira, Glover, & Paterson in Paterson et al. 2016 , described from the Kaplan Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone, East Pacific Ocean, but these species lack a row of long neurochaetae on chaetiger 3 and possess different branchial distribution (four pairs in P. ehlersi and P. amarsupiata ; two pairs in P. branchilucida and P. kaplani ). A narrow rectangular prostomium and a row of long neurochaetae on chaetiger 3 are present in Prionospio fauchaldi , described from the continental slope of northwestern Atlantic Ocean, discussed in detail further below.

Whereas the row of long neurochaetae on chaetiger 3 and a third row of capillaries on some anterior notopodia are known only from Prionospio corrugata sp. nov. and P. fauchaldi , sculptured branchiae have only been observed in P. cinthyae sp. nov., P. sandersi , described from the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador, P. laciniosa and P. vallensis . These species can be distinguished from P. corrugata sp. nov. by the prostomial morphology (rectangular and truncated anteriorly in P. corrugata sp. nov., P. fauchaldi , triangular in P. cinthyae sp. nov. and P. vallensis , broadly rounded in P. sandersi and triangular in P. laciniosa ), presence of typical sabre chaetae (except for P. fauchaldi , see discussion below) and by the branchial distribution (up to six pairs in P. corrugata sp. nov., four pairs in P. fauchaldi , P. laciniosa , P. cinthyae sp. nov. and P. vallensis , and nine pairs in P. sandersi ). Species also differ on the presence, morphology and distribution of dorsal crests, which are lacking in P. sandersi , present as semicircular flaps on chaetigers 5–13 in P. laciniosa , present from chaetigers 8–9 to chaetigers 14–15 in P. corrugata sp. nov., from chaetiger 6 to beyond chaetiger 20 in P. vallensis , from chaetigers 8–11 in P. fauchaldi (distribution not mentioned) and from chaetiger 6 to chaetigers 7–9 in P. cinthyae sp. nov. ( Maciolek 1985; Paterson et al. 2016).

Prionospio corrugata is very similar to P. fauchaldi , as both species bear a rectangular prostomium, a long row of neurochaetae on chaetiger 3, three rows of notopodial chaetae on several anterior segments, hooks with four pairs of secondary teeth and delicate sabre chaetae. However, the species differ in important characters, such as the number of branchiae, up to six pairs in P. corrugata sp. nov. and four pairs in P. fauchaldi , shape of the postchaetal lamellae on chaetiger 1 (elliptical on the notopodium and rounded on the neuropodium of P. corrugata sp. nov. and rounded on the notopodium and elliptical on the neuropodium of P. fauchaldi ), chaetigers bearing three rows of capillaries in the notopodium (from chaetiger 2 to chaetigers 10– 12 P. corrugata sp. nov. and from chaetiger 2 to chaetigers 15–17 in P. fauchaldi ), distribution of dorsal crests (from chaetigers 8–9 to chaetigers 14–15 in P. corrugata sp. nov. and starting from chaetigers 8–11 in P. fauchaldi [distribution not mentioned]).

Species mentioned above can also be distinguished by the shape of notopodial postchaetal lamellae on various anterior chaetigers (larger on chaetigers 2–8 and broad, square-shaped on chaetiger 8 in P. corrugata sp. nov.), starting chaetiger of neuropodial hooded hooks (chaetigers 10–12 in P. corrugata sp. nov. and chaetigers 12–13 in P. fauchaldi ) and the presence of sabre chaetae on all chaetigers from chaetigers 10–17 in P. corrugata sp. nov. which are frequently lacking in P. fauchaldi . Unfortunately, all type material of P. fauchaldi was incomplete, thus making it impossible to compare the starting chaetiger of notopodial hooded hooks and pygidial morphology ( Maciolek 1985).

Etymology. The specific epithet, corrugata , derives from the wrinkled appearance of branchiae from chaetigers 2 and 5 (corruga, Latin for wrinkled and the suffix - atus, meaning possessing, bearing).

Habitat: Muddy sand to mud, 140–1905 m depth.

Distribution: Southeastern Brazil (Espírito Santo and Campos basins), Atlantic Ocean.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Annelida

Class

Polychaeta

Order

Spionida

Family

Spionidae

Genus

Prionospio

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF