Sinocrossocheilus Wu

Yuan, Le-Yang, Zhang, E & Huang, Yan-Fei, 2008, Revision of the Labeonine Genus Sinocrossocheilus (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from South China, Zootaxa 1809, pp. 36-48 : 38

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.182763

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6235777

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687C6-F94E-FFA2-A9EE-1CF1FBF9FAE5

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Sinocrossocheilus Wu
status

 

Sinocrossocheilus Wu View in CoL View at ENA in Wu, Lin, Chen, Chen & He, 1977

Type species: Sinocrossocheilus guizhouensis Wu in Wu, Lin, Chen, Chen & He, 1977.

Diagnosis. Sinocrossocheilus can be easily separated from all other Asian genera of the Labeonini sensu Reid, 1982 by the presence of a lower lip with its median lobe modified into a densely papillated, greatly protruded, crescentic fold, and a papillated, somewhat protruded, triangular fleshy pad that is posteriorly continuous with the mental region ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A). It is separated from all other Asian Labeonini fishes with the exception of Hongshuia Zhang, Xin & Lan, 2008 (type species: Hongshuia paoli Zhang, Xin and Lan, 2008 ), all species of Parasinilabeo Wu in Wu, Lin, Chen, Chen & He, 1977 (type species: Parasinilabeo assimilis Wu & Yao in Wu, Lin, Chen, Chen & He, 1977) exclusive of P. longibarbus Zhu, Lan & Zhang, 2006 , which has eight branched dorsal-fin rays, and Qianlabeo Zhang & Chen, 2004 (type species: Qianlabeo striatus Zhang & Chen, 2004 ) by possessing seven (vs. no fewer than eight) branched dorsal-fin rays.

Among Asian Labeonini genera, Sinocrossocheilus is most similar to Hongshuia , with which it shares a papillose, crenulated rostral fold that is disconnected from the lower lip at the corners of the mouth, welldeveloped maxillary barbels, seven branched dorsal-fin rays, and two rows of pharyngeal teeth. Both differ in the details of lower lip morphology ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 A–D) and in colour pattern ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 A–C). In Sinocrossocheilus , the median lobe of the lower lip possesses a crescentic (vs. ring-like in Hongshuia ) fold capping (vs. surrounding) the slightly protruded (vs. flat), roughly triangular (vs. round) fleshy pad; the posterior (vs. posteromedian) margin of the fleshy pad (vs. ring-like fold) is posteriorly continuous with the mental region. And a conspicuous black bar on the upper half of the flank immediately above the fifth lateral line scale is missing in Hongshuia , but present in Sinocrossocheilus .

Sinocrossocheilus is further separated from both Qianlabeo and Parasinilabeo by having a rostral fold disconnected (vs. connected) from the lower lip at the corners of the mouth, two (vs. three) rows of pharyngeal teeth, and by lacking postlabial grooves (vs. present only in the sides of the lower jaw in Parasinilabeo , or prolonged anteromedially, but not meeting with its counterpart at the midline in Qianlabeo ); from all species of Parasinilabeo exclusive of P. longibarbus by the presence of well-developed (vs. none or minute) maxillary barbels; and from Qianlabeo by lacking an upper lip (vs. present only in and completely adnate to the side of the upper jaw) (vs. present). For the morphology of oramandibular structures of Qianlabeo and Parasinilabeo , see Zhang & Chen’s (2004: 30), figs.1(c)–(d), respectively.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF