Limacina sp. 1
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26879/733 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2B5D7C0F-1AE0-4310-9751-97FC6FD64475 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039787BD-FFE5-C730-5BAC-FDDA0B549669 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Limacina sp. 1 |
status |
|
Figure 11.1-2 View FIGURE 11
Material examined. Five specimens, all from the same sample TDP 17.37.1, 0-13 cm; 106.90- 107.03 m below surface, 118.90-119.03 composite depth; RGM 777440 View Materials a-c ( Table 3) .
Description. Low conical limacinid of 3.75 moderately convex whorls attaching on periphery of foregoing whorls. Aperture semicircular, slightly more than half shell height, Base regularly rounded, umbilicus c. 1/6th of shell diameter.
Discussion. Three of the available specimens are juveniles in poor preservation. In specimen RGM 777440b ( Figure 11.2 View FIGURE 11 ) the first whorl is missing. The two more adult specimens show a striking resemblance with a limacinid illustrated by Lokno and Kumar (2008, figure 3-2) from the Upper Disang Formation (Bartonian - Priabonian) of the Phek District, south-central Nagaland (Assam - Arakan Basin), northeastern India, indicated by these authors as “ Limacinidae type A.” As these specimens were recorded from Indian Ocean Basin rocks of more or less similar age they could very well represent the same species as the Tanzanian ones. However, the material is insufficient for a reliable identification. Lokno and Kumar compared their specimens with “ Limacina pygmaea , ” as illustrated by Hodgkinson et al. (1992, pl. 3, figures 14-15), correctly stating that that name “most certainly is incorrect,” as Hodgkinson et al.’s species seems to be closely related to L. gormani ( Curry, 1982) (see above) and not to Limacina pygmaea .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.