Procas lecontei Bedel, 1879
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1234.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8D608A41-09CD-4626-935E-26BF20AB7587 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039787D5-FFAA-FFD3-1526-FEA8BC81FB8D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Procas lecontei Bedel |
status |
|
Procas picipes (Marsham [erratim Stephens]): LeConte & Horn 1876: 162; Hubbard & Schwarz 1878: 642.[Misidentifications]
Procas lecontei Bedel, 1879 : lii, 1884: 113; LeConte & Horn 1883: 473; Henshaw 1885: 139; Leng 1920: 318; Klima 1934: 31; Arnett 1962: 983, 1003; Kissinger 1964: 47; Obrien & Wibmer 1982: 89; Arnett 1985: 394, 2000: 516; Bousquet 1991: 339; Downie & Arnett 1996: 1526; O’Brien & Anderson 1996: 5; Anderson 1997b: 528, 536, 560, 2002: 731.
Procas sp. Anderson 1997a: 439 .
Description
Length 4.1–5.9 mm, mean (23) = 5.1. Head with frontal pit indistinct or absent; rostrum (male) × 3.67–5.0 as long as broad, mean (7) = 4.24; rostrum (female) × 4.0–4.57 as long as broad, mean (5) = 4.26, × 0.88–1.03 as long as pronotum, mean (12) = 0.95; upper surface coarsely and irregularly punctate, with no trace of a median carina.
Antennae ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 15–20 ) with lengths of funicle segments 1–3 in ratio 10: (5.0–7.1): (3.7–5.2), mean (16) = 10: 6.1: 4.5; segment 2 × 1.11–1.56 as long as 3, mean (16) = 2.23; segment 4 quadrate, usually broader than 3; segment 7 distinctly transverse, × 0.60–0.75 as long as broad, mean (13) = 0.7.
Prothorax × 0.83–0.88 as long as broad, mean (12) = 0.85; pronotum often with no trace of a smooth median line.
Elytra usually with white flecks at top of declivity in interstriae (2) and 3 ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–8 ) but they are often reduced, obscure, or even (apparently) absent.
Legs sometimes entirely dark redbrown (except coxae).
Vestiture as in P. p. picipes .
Terminalia. Male sternite 8 with processes short, stout, fused together along half their length or more but with sclerotized elements remaining separate ( Figs 96–99 View FIGURES 86–99 ); female sternite 8 with pigmented areas fused, fringing setae small (<0.03 mm)( Figs 41–43 View FIGURES 39–43 ); spermatheca with glandlobe small, shape variable ( Figs 68–73 View FIGURES 65–73 ).
Type material
Bedel’s type has not been examined but the La Vita Pass specimens are topotypes and Bedel’s comments clearly refer to this species.
Other material examined
UNITED STATES: 3 ex. Colorado, [La] Vita Pass , [2869 m], 28.vi (Hubbard & Schwarz)(2 BMNH, 1 CNC) ; 1 ex. ditto, except 22.vi ( BMNH) . CANADA: 1 ex. Ontario, with ‘ E. Ont. / Can. / 1884 H.F. W[ickham] ’; 1 ex. Ottawa , vi.1914 (G. Beaulieu) ; 1 ex. Ottawa , 12.v (C.H. Curran) ; 1 ex. Ottawa, Nepean St. , 15.x.192[?] ; 1 ex. with ‘ Ayl [mer] Rd. ’, 15.x ; 1 ex. Pearson, Smith , 28.v.[19]46 ; 2 ex. Pearson [Point], 5.viii.[19]46, nos. 10, 11 ; 1 ex. Pearson P[oin]t, 2.vii.[19]46, (‘R.’) ; 1 ex. Lake Ontario (?), Wilson I., 6.viii.[19]46 ; 1 ex. Hull, Chelsea , 19.vi.1911 (all CNC) ; 2 ex. Quebec, Duparquet , 1, 3.vi.1938 ; 5 ex. Duparquet , 1, 3.vi.1938, 30.vi.1940, 17.v.1942, 24.vi.1943, all ‘16924’ (all G. Stace Smith)(all CAS) ; 1 ex, Manitoba, Aweme , 1.vii.1924 (N. Criddle) ; 1 ex. North West Territories, Exmouth L[ake], 65° 02' N, 115° 54' W, 24.viii.1966 (G.E. Shewell), M.T.S. Gravity Survey Camp GoogleMaps ; 1 ex. Yukon, Dawson, with ‘60 Mi. Rd. ’, vii.1949 (W. Judd)(all CNC) . Total : 25 specimens.
Other (published) localities
UNITED STATES: Michigan, Marquette; Michipicoton River ( Hubbard & Schwarz 1878: 642).
Comments
The white elytral spots resemble those of P. biguttatus but are less extensive (often reduced to a single spot on elytral interstria 3) and the setae composing them are often finer, so they are less conspicuous; in some specimens the spots seem to be absent. A ‘white scutellum’ is present in some specimens. The vestiture varies, as in P. granulicollis ; in most of the specimens from La Vita Pass it is coarser and browner than in those from other localities. In spite of the extraordinary variation in the shape of the glandlobe of the spermatheca ( Figs 68–73 View FIGURES 65–73 ) and the wide geographical separation of the populations studied, there is no clear evidence of localized variation among them.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Procas lecontei Bedel
Thompson, Richard T. 2006 |
Procas sp. Anderson 1997a: 439
Anderson, R. S. 1997: 439 |
Procas lecontei
Arnett, R. H. 2000: 516 |
Anderson, R. S. 1997: 528 |
Downie, N. M. & Arnett, R. H. 1996: 1526 |
O'Brien, C. W. & Anderson, D. M. 1996: 5 |
Bousquet, Y. 1991: 339 |
Arnett, R. H. 1985: 394 |
Kissinger, D. 1964: 47 |
Arnett, R. H. 1962: 983 |
Klima, A. 1934: 31 |
Leng, C. W. 1920: 318 |
Henshaw, S. 1885: 139 |
LeConte, J. L. & Horn, G. H. 1883: 473 |
Procas picipes
Hubbard, H. G. & Schwarz, E. A. 1878: 642 |
LeConte, J. L. & Horn, G. H. 1876: 162 |