Meri sanctivincenti ( Simon, 1898 ) Rheims & Jäger, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5135.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0CC0D586-E099-4593-9032-EA1885F00F3B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6820304 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039787EF-FF9C-C930-FF32-FD46FCE4FE36 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Meri sanctivincenti ( Simon, 1898 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Meri sanctivincenti ( Simon, 1898) View in CoL comb. nov.
Figs 250–252 View FIGURES 250–252 , 315 View FIGURES 315–318
Sparassus sancti-vincentii Simon, 1898: 877 (unknown number of male and female syntypes [1 female lectotype, 1 female paralectotype, here designated] from St. Vincent [13.2500, ‑61.2000] NHM, 2 female syntypes examined, others not located)
Olios sancti-vincenti: Petrunkevitch 1911: 502 View in CoL (emendation of spelling); Roewer 1955: 709.
Olios sanctivincentii: Bonnet 1958: 3179 (emendation of spelling).
Note. Simon (1898) originally described both males and females of M. sanctivincenti View in CoL comb. nov. However, Roewer (1955) lists only females decribed. In addition, Jäger (2020: 94) states that, although a type series was located at NHM, it included only female specimens. Since the description does not allow the proper identification and the location of the male types is unknown, we are designating the female specimens deposited in NHM as lectotype and paralectotype, thus fixing the name to the female.
Diagnosis. Females of M. sanctivincenti comb. nov. resemble those of M. tapirapeco spec. nov. ( Figs 257–259 View FIGURES 253–259 ) and M. zeteki spec. nov. ( Figs 309–311 View FIGURES 309–311 ) by the epigyne with EP opening medially on MS. They are distinguished from both species by the MS with lateral margins diverning anteriorly ( Fig. 250 View FIGURES 250–252 ) and vulva with spermathecae rounded with smooth margins ( Fig. 251 View FIGURES 250–252 ) (MS with lateral margins converging anteriorly and spermathecae with grooved margins in M. tapirapeco spec. nov. and M. zeteki spec. nov.). Males were not located.
Description. See Simon 1898
Additional description. Epigyne: EF slightly wider than long; MAB long and narrow; MS longer than wide; EP triangular, as wide as long ( Fig. 250 View FIGURES 250–252 ). Vulva: internal ducts with FW sinuous, posteriad; GP arising from ducts at first turn, anteriad; FD antero laterad (figs 251–252).
Distribution. Only known from the type locality ( Fig. 315 View FIGURES 315–318 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Meri sanctivincenti ( Simon, 1898 )
Rheims, Cristina A. & Jäger, Peter 2022 |
Olios sanctivincentii:
Bonnet, P. 1958: 3179 |
Olios sancti-vincenti:
Roewer, C. F. 1955: 709 |
Petrunkevitch, A. 1911: 502 |
Sparassus sancti-vincentii
Simon, E. 1898: 877 |