Odontofroggatia Ishii

Feng, Gui & Huang, Da-Wei, 2010, Description of a new species of Odontofroggatia (Chalcidoidea, Epichrysomallinae) associated with Ficus microcarpa (Moraceae) with a key to species of the genus, Zootaxa 2335, pp. 40-48 : 41

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.193180
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6210032
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03984149-FF8F-FFF0-FF53-FD923FD5ECA1
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Odontofroggatia Ishii
status

Treatment

Odontofroggatia Ishii View in CoL View at ENA

Odontofroggatia Ishii, 1934: 95 View in CoL . Type species: Odontofroggatia gajimaru Ishii View in CoL , by original designation.

Diagnosis. Both sexes: occipital carina absent; malar sulcus absent; three ocelli arranged in an obtuse-angled triangle ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 C, G, K); scrobes very shallow; notauli complete and reaching transscutal suture, anterior margin of scutellum pointed at posterior margin of mid lobe of mesoscutum ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 B, F, J, K), tarsi tetramerous. Female: antennal formula 11063 ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 E, M) or 11053 ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A), funicular segments subequal in length and width; scutellum with 2 pairs of long setae on dorsal surface, one pair mediolaterally and one pair apically ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 B, F, J); fore wing with marginal cilia and membrane ciliated except for the basal third, postmarginal vein extremely short ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 b); hypopygium wide and short ( Wiebes 1980, fig. 9). Male: antennal formula 11053, both funicular segments and club without plate sensilla but with many hairs ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 C, G, K, O); mouth opening very broad, mandibles long and falcate in most species; pronotum much longer than mesoscutum ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 d); petiole often armed with lateral teeth ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 D, H) or a ventral hook ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 P); gaster much shorter than thorax and dorsoventrally flattened ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 C).

Biology. Odontofroggatia gajimaru and our new species are currently known only from F. microcarpa , whereas the other three species have been reared from both F. microcarpa and F. prasinicarpa , though the latter fig host record is based on just a single collection of material from Papua, New Guinea ( Bouček 1988).