Crematogaster opuntiae, BUREN, 1968
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlab047 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6144DD31-0F7B-4589-86A3-F40994452C9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6352258 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039987E6-FFE6-FFCA-FC89-7CD8FC73608F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Crematogaster opuntiae |
status |
|
CREMATOGASTER OPUNTIAE BUREN, 1968 View in CoL , STAT. REV.
( FIG. 25 View Figures 25–30 )
Crematogaster opuntiae Buren, 1968: 120 View in CoL . Holotype worker, Santa Rita Experimental Range , Arizona (Buren) (LACM) (examined).
Junior synonym of C. vermiculata: Morgan & Mackay, 2017: 396 View in CoL ; here overturned.
Worker measurements (N = 10): HW 0.86–1.21, HL 0.80–1.11, SL 0.72–0.94, WL 0.89–1.27, MtFL 0.74– 1.05, MSC 1–3, A4SC 5–16, PP-SL/HW 0.14–0.19, CI 1.05–1.11, OI 0.26–0.29, SI 0.75–0.84, MtFL/HW 0.85– 0.89, SPL/HW 0.19–0.25, SPTD/HW 0.50–0.59.
Discussion: Crematogaster opuntiae bears little similarity or close phylogenetic relationship ( Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ) to the eastern, swamp-inhabiting species C. vermiculata , under which it was synonymized by Morgan & Mackay (2017). Among obvious differences, it has longer scapes and legs (SL/HL 0.83–0.90 and MtFL/HL 0.91–0.95 compared to SL/HL 0.75–0.82 and MtFL/HL 0.84–0.89 in C. vermiculata ), predominantly reticulate-foveolate sculpture on the promesonotum, more divergent propodeal spines (SPTD/ PPW 1.71–1.96 compared to 1.15–1.48 in C. vermiculata ) and lesser amounts of standing pilosity (MSC 1–3 and A4SC 5–16, compared to MSC 3–9 and A4SC 9–20 in C. vermiculata ). As noted by Buren (1968), C. opuntiae is similar to C. californica , differing primarily by the shinier head and by the more appressed pubescence on the scapes and head. The relationship of C. opuntiae to C. californica remains to be clarified – they may well prove to be conspecific. Crematogaster opuntiae has similar eye, scape, leg ( Fig. 42 View Figures 40–47 ) and propodeal spine dimensions as C. californica , and in our phylogenomic analyses the two are sister-taxa ( Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ).
Distribution and biology: Buren (1968) recorded C. opuntiae from desert and semi-desert regions of Arizona and considered C. californica to be restricted to California and Baja California. Both taxa are ground-nesting.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Crematogaster opuntiae
Ward, Philip S. & Blaimer, Bonnie B. 2022 |
Crematogaster opuntiae
Buren WF 1968: 120 |