Protognoriste, BLAGODEROV & GRIMALDI, 2004

BLAGODEROV, VLADIMIR & GRIMALDI, DAVID, 2004, Fossil Sciaroidea (Diptera) in Cretaceous Ambers, Exclusive of Cecidomyiidae, Sciaridae, and Keroplatidae, American Museum Novitates 3433 (1), pp. 1-76 : 17

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0082(2004)433<0001:FSDICA>2.0.CO;2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5060480

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039A87C9-FF90-FF8F-FF5B-FBA2FC1FFD0F

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Protognoriste
status

gen. nov.

Protognoriste , new genus

DIAGNOSIS: Wing membrane without macrotrichia, occiput without row of strong setae. Palpi short. Eyes bare. Face wide. Stem of M and M 2 absent. RS base distinct. Crossvein r­m meets M 3+4 and CuA stem. CuA gently curved. Abdomen insertion broad. Fore tibiae shorter than femora.

TYPE SPECIES: Protognoriste amplicauda , n.sp.

ETYMOLOGY: The name is a combination of protos (Greek πρω´ τos, or first) and the genus name Gnoriste . The name is feminine.

COMMENTS: The following apomorphic characters refer the genera Plesiognoriste and Protognoriste to the Lygistorrhinidae : short palpi; small dorsal cleft of anepisternum; anepisternum and metepimeron not divided by laterotergite (possibly plesiomorphic); short, incomplete Sc; short R 1; RS base and M stem reduced; r­m horizontal and fused with R 5; hind coxa smaller and broader than mid coxa; abdomen insertion narrow; cerci simple. Face wide, with three ocelli, situated almost in straight line, suggestive of Manotinae , but structures of palpi, katepisternum and metepimeron, and absence of strong setae, show no apomorphies with respect to that subfamily. Eye size, face width, vein vestiture, tibial spurs of equal size, and complicated shape of the gonostyli are more primitive conditions than occur in Recent lygistorrhinids, although some features of venation and gonostyli are apomorphic. The short fork of M 3+4 and CuA and absence of a long proboscis are most similar to the genus Seguyola Matile. It is possible that these two genera should be treated as a separate subfamily of Lygistorrhinidae . We prefer to expand the definition of the family to include newly described taxa.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Diadocidiidae

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF