Chivinia Shestakov, 1932

Long, Khuat Dang, Achterberg, Cornelis Van, Dzuong, Nguyen Van, Oanh, Nguyen Thi & Mai, Pham Quynh, 2023, The identity of Chivinia Shestakov (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Braconinae), with description of a similar species from the Oriental region, Zootaxa 5343 (6), pp. 531-538 : 532

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5343.6.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:726A3BAF-678C-48B6-9B06-83644032EA78

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10562856

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039B87BC-054E-FFAF-D5AF-22DBFD88DC95

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Chivinia Shestakov, 1932
status

 

Subgenus Chivinia Shestakov, 1932

Type species and only known species: Chivinia zimini Shestakov, 1932 (examined).

Diagnosis. Vein r-m of fore wing absent; vein 3-SR+SR1 of fore wing strongly curved and vein 1-R1 much shorter than pterostigma; end of sclerotized part of CU1a widened; vein cu-a of fore wing postfurcal ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ); vein m-cu of fore wing about as long as vein 1-M; scape short and subtruncate apically ( Fig. 1J View FIGURE 1 ); malar space long and directly narrowed ventrally ( Fig. 1E View FIGURE 1 ); tarsal claws simple and slender ( Fig. 1C View FIGURE 1 ); fore tarsus slightly longer than fore tibia; first metasomal tergite longer than wide apically and without medio-longitudinal depression; metasoma smooth; setose part of ovipositor sheath about as long as first tergite ( Fig. 1L View FIGURE 1 ).

Notes. Chivinia was treated as separate genus by Tobias (1986) despite the fact that in an earlier publication ( Tobias 1968), he considered the type species only to be an aberration of Bracon repetekiensis Tobias, 1967 . This is highly unlikely because the latter species has vein cu-a of the fore wing interstitial (distinctly postfurcal in B. zimini ), vein SR1 of the fore wing straight (strongly curved and partly narrowed), the metasoma partly membranous dorsally (entirely sclerotized) and vein 1-R1 of the fore wing medium-sized (0.7 × as long as pterostigma versus 0.2 ×). The reduced marginal cell of the fore wing most likely indicates a relationship with the Bracon kasachstanicus - group but is different, because, for example, of the lost vein r-m of the fore wing. This group and B. zimini are known from the semi-arid parts of Central Asia. van Achterberg and Polaszek (1996) synonymized Chivinia with Bracon because of the similarity with the B. kasachstanicus -group. For the present we treat it as a subgenus until the phylogeny is properly studied, and because we consider the type species aberrant enough for subgeneric rank by having the vein cu-a of the fore wing postfurcal, tarsal claws simple, fore wing vein SR1 strongly curved, and fore wing vein CU1a partly widened.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Braconidae

Genus

Chivinia

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF