Tricellaria porteri ( MacGillivray, 1889 )

Dyrynda, P. E. J., Fairall, V. R., Ambrogi, A. Occhipinti & d’Hondt, J. - L., 2000, The distribution, origins and taxonomy of Tricellaria inopinata d’Hondt and Occhipinti Ambrogi, 1985, an invasive bryozoan new to the Atlantic, Journal of Natural History 34 (10), pp. 1993-2006 : 2001

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222930050144828

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10237789

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039F87FA-FF8D-3B0D-FEA1-EDBAFDD2FC53

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Tricellaria porteri ( MacGillivray, 1889 )
status

 

Tricellaria porteri ( MacGillivray, 1889) View in CoL

Tricellaria porteri View in CoL , which is, to date, only known from southern Australia, was highlighted by Occhipinti Ambrogi and d’ Hondt (1994) as a possible senior synonym of T. inopinata View in CoL . The original description of Menipea porteri by MacGillivray (1889) refers to the presence of reniform (kidney-shaped) scuta, variable internode lengths and bi®d spines. It also refers to the ovicell pores as forming a single transverse row. We have examined paratype specimens of T. porteri , all from South Australia (including slides 65508, 65509, Rev. Porter collection; 65511, 65513, Museum of Victoria, Melbourne) and have come to the conclusion that this taxon is morphologically diOEerentiable from the other two taxa. The most striking characteristic is the consistently large and highly reniform scuta, quite unlike those encountered in the other two taxa (®gure 2). Only a small minority of scuta bear irregular margins. We observed 3±13 autozooids per internode and proximal external bi®d spines on many autozooids. Lateral avicularia were sparsely present. We found the arrangement of ovicell pores to be very variable, usually scattered but occasionally forming a row in the manner described by MacGillivray (1889).

Two recent published descriptions from South Australia attributed to T. porteri present di culties. Bock (1982) made reference to variable internodes and`ovate’ scuta (but ®gured more irregularly-shaped ones) and made no mention of bi®d spines. This material needs re-appraising. Brock (1985) ®gured a variety of scuta morphologies and some bi®d spines. The former is only consistent with our characterization of T. inopinata View in CoL . A more recent study makes reference to the presence of T. porteri as a fouling species in Port Kembla, New South Wales ( Moran and Grant, 1993) although the information provided is insu cient to con®rm its identity according to the criteria de®ned here.

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF