Chileotrecha argentinensis Iuri

Iuri, Hernán A., Iglesias, Mónica S. & Ojanguren Affilastro, Andrés A., 2014, A new species of Chileotrecha Maury, 1987 (Solifugae: Ammotrechidae) from Argentina with notes on the genus, Zootaxa 3827 (1) : -

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3827.1.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3FC61BA3-18A8-4E51-A963-CA629D76F871

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5625535

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A287D3-FF9C-FFA2-30FB-4BDEFB565B79

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Chileotrecha argentinensis Iuri
status

sp. nov.

Chileotrecha argentinensis Iuri View in CoL new species

Figs. 3–6 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 2 , 7 View FIGURE 7 , 8 View FIGURE 8 , 11–12 View FIGURES 11 – 16. 11 – 12 , 17–28 View FIGURES 17 – 22 View FIGURES 23 – 28 ; Table 1 View TABLE 1

Type material. Holotype ♂ MACN (31210): Argentina, San Luis, Sierra de las Quijadas National Park, 705 m asl, [32,46900ºS 66,96085ºW]. 3–7-XI-2013. H. A. Iuri, A. A. Ojanguren-Affilastro, C. J. Grismado, C. Mattoni and R. Botero-Trujillo coll.

Paratypes: 4 ♂ MACN (31211 to 31214): Same data as the holotype; 2 ♀ MACN (31215 and 31216): Same data as the holotype; 1 immature MACN (31217): Same data as the holotype; Other examined material: 1 ♂ MACN (31218): Argentina, Catamarca, Andalgalá. 27-II-1972. F. Enders coll.; 1 ♀ MACN (31219). Argentina, San Juan, Astica. 13-IV-1979. A. Roig-Alsina coll.; 1 immature MACN (31220). Argentina, San Juan, 50 km N of Marayes. 12-IV-1979. A. Roig coll.

Etymology. The name of the species refers to Argentina, where it was collected. This is the first record of genus Chileotrecha for this country.

Diagnosis. Males of C. argentinensis n. sp. can be separated from males of C. atacamensis because the apex of flagellum of C. argentinensis n. sp. bears few spicules and is placed over a furrow at the fixed finger tip ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 2 ), whereas in C. atacamensis it bears several spicules and is placed above the fixed finger tip ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 2 ). Additionally in C. argentinensis n. sp. the ventral border of the flagellum is almost straight and the attachment ring is located between the principal and first ectal fondal teeth ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 2 ), whereas in C. atacamensis the ventral border of the flagellum is concave and its attachment ring is placed at the level of the second ectal fondal tooth ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 2 ). In C. argentinensis n. sp. the fixed finger tip is less inclined and the anterior teeth less prominent than in C. atacamensis ( Figs. 1 and 3 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 2 ). Chileotrecha argentinensis n. sp. presents a yellowish pedipalp tarsus ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ), whereas in C. atacamensis it is dark brown. In C. argentinensis n. sp., the posterior edges of lateral lobes of female genital plate, are more convex than in the female specimens from Chile that we have studied (not assigned to any species) ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 2 ).

Description. Male Holotype. Measurements in mm in Table 1 View TABLE 1 .

Color in 96 % ethanol. Prosoma: Propeltidium dark brown with central portion pale brown. Lateral lobes dark brown. Ocular tubercle black. Insertion of setae yellowish. Para-, meso- and metapeltidium dark brown, insertion of setae yellowish.

Chelicerae: dark brown with three longitudinal oval areas pale brown. Insertion of setae yellowish.

Pedipalps: Femur and tibia brown with apical portion pale yellowish. Metatarsus dark brown. Tarsus pale yellowish. Insertion of setae pale yellowish.

Legs: Legs I, II and III; coxae and trochanter pale yellowish. Femur, tibia and metatarsus brown with apical portion pale yellowish. Tarsus yellowish. Leg IV; with a similar color pattern, but the brown portion is darker.

Malleoli: Brown with external margin darker.

Opisthosoma: Tergites dark brown with insertion of setae yellowish. Pleurites dark grey in the dorsal half and yellowish in ventral half. Sternites yellowish.

Morphology and Chaetotaxy: Prosoma: Propeltidium wider than long with some short spiniform blunt setae, separated from lateral lobes by dorsal grooves. Peltidium narrow, with a transverse row of different-sized spiniform blunt and bifurcated setae. Parapeltidium smooth. Meso and metapeltidium wider than long, with spiniform blunt and bifurcated setae.

Chelicerae ( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 2 , 23 View FIGURES 23 – 28 ): Ectal and dorsal surfaces covered by spiniform blunt and bifurcated setae. Mesal surface covered by small bristles, with two rows of plumose setae behind the teeth line and one posterior row of blunt setae. Stridulatory apparatus with eight parallel ridges ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23 – 28 ). Movable finger with one row of plumose setae, and two rows of blunt setae. Dentition: Movable finger with one anterior (I), one intermediate (II), and one principal tooth (III) arranged in increasing size: II, I and III. Fixer finger with three anterior (I–III), one intermediate (IV), and one principal tooth (V), arranged in increasing size IV=II, I, III=V; four ectal fondal teeth arranged in increasing size II=IV, I=III, and four mesal fondal teeth arranged in increasing size II, IV, III, I with I and II separated from III and IV by a diastema (similar to mesal fondal teeth arrangement in fig. 2). Fixed finger tip slightly curved downward ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 2 ).

Flagellum ( Figs. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 2 , 23, 24 View FIGURES 23 – 28 ): A thin translucent drop-shaped membrane, with nearly straight ventral border. The folded edge presents several rows of spicules that become more prominent in the apical area. The inner surface is covered by several spicules ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23 – 28 ). The attachment ring of the flagellum is located at the level between principal and first ectal fondal teeth ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 2 ).

Pedipalps ( Figs. 11, 12 View FIGURES 11 – 16. 11 – 12 , 28 View FIGURES 23 – 28 ): All segments coated with several small truncated tip setae with pore ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 11 – 16. 11 – 12 ), some blunt setae of different sizes, and small ventral spines. Metatarsus with a few clubbed setae ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 11 – 16. 11 – 12 ). Tarsus short, with some clubbed setae, bifurcated setae and dorsal pores ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 23 – 28 ). The clubbed setae are twice as long as the truncate setae with pore. The blunt setae present different sizes, but are always equal or longer than clubbed setae. Tibia with five paired short spines and metatarsus with six paired short spines; the basal pair is the weakest in both segments.

Legs: Leg I ( Figs. 17–20 View FIGURES 17 – 22 ): Without claws and spines, covered with small blunt setae; metatarsus with some clubbed setae; tarsus with some clubbed and some bifurcated setae ( Fig. 19 View FIGURES 17 – 22 ), and with an apical structure ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 17 – 22 ) that could be a vestigial remnant of the claw. Legs II, III and IV covered with some robust bifurcated setae, and some blunt setae with different sizes. The trochanters possess robust dorsal spiniform setae. Legs II and III: Tibia with two apical ventral spines; metatarsus with 1.1.1 retrolaterodorsal spines, 1.1 retrolateral spines intercalated with the retro-latero-dorsal being 1.(1).1.(1).1, and 1.1.2 ventral spines; tarsus bi-segmented with 1.2.2/2.2 ventral spines. Leg IV ( Figs. 21–22 View FIGURES 17 – 22 ): Tibia with 1.1.2 ventral spines; metatarsus with 1.1.1.2 ventral spines; tarsus bisegmented with pseudo segmentation on basal segment ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 17 – 22 ), and 2.2.2-2/2.2 ventral spines.

Opisthosoma: Tergites with some spiniform blunt and bifurcated setae. Sternites ( Figs. 25–27 View FIGURES 23 – 28 ) with several bifurcated and a few tapered setae ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 23 – 28 ). Two pairs of microsetae ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 23 – 28 ) are placed in the posterior margin of genital plate ( Figs. 25, 26 View FIGURES 23 – 28 ) and in the posterior margin of spiracular sternites I and II, whereas in postspiracular sternite I there is only one microseta on each side.

Female paratypes: Measurements in mm in Table 1 View TABLE 1 .

Similar to male, but more glabrous, especially on the pedipalp. Prosoma and dorsal surface of trochanters with some spiniform bifurcated setae. Propeltidium notably wider than long. The spines of pedipalps are longer than in males. Chelicerae with a dorsal hump on the fixed finger ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 2 ). Genital plate as in Figure 6 View FIGURES 1 – 6. 1 – 2 .

Distribution: Chileotrecha argentinensis n. sp. occurs in central-western Argentina ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ), in areas of Monte and ecotonal zones of Monte and arid Chaco; in an altitude range from 700 to 1000 m asl. Most of the studied specimens were collected in Sierra de las Quijadas National Park, in a rocky area at the base of some low hills in the park main entrance. The environment corresponds to the Argentine Monte de Llanuras y Mesetas ecoregion ( Burkart et al., 1999). The climate in the area is warm and dry, with large daily thermal range and low rainfall (80–300 mm annually). The predominant vegetation is high shrub steppe ( Pol et al, 2006).

TABLE 1. Measurements in mm of Chileotrecha argentinensis n. sp. (except propeltidium length / width ratio).

Morphometric Character ♂ Holotype ♀ Paratype
Total Length without chelicerae 8.03 8.04
Total Length with chelicerae 9.67 9.97
Propeltidium Width 1.78 2.40
Propeltidium Length 1.64 1.85
Propeltidium: Length/Width Ratio 0.92 0.77
Cheliceral Width 0.87 1.24
Cheliceral Length 2.34 3.58
Opisthosoma 5.06 5.18
Pedipalp Length 9.24 8.62
Leg I Length 5.93 6.82
Leg IV Length 9.92 9.96
MACN

Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF