Aspidosperma quirandy Hassl., 1913

Castello, Ana Carolina Devides, Pereira, Andreza Stephanie De Souza, Shimizu, Gustavo Hiroaki, Zuntini, Alexandre Rizzo, Simões, André Olmos & Koch, Ingrid, 2022, Taxonomy and nomenclature of Aspidosperma (Apocynaceae), Phytotaxa 571 (3), pp. 239-277 : 264

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.571.3.1
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7295871
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A787AC-2F68-FFD4-82D1-E5C5C05595E5
treatment provided by	Plazi
scientific name	Aspidosperma quirandy Hassl.
status

Treatment

Aspidosperma quirandy Hassl. View in CoL in Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 12(325/330): 259. 1913.

≡ Aspidosperma quirandy View in CoL var. quirandy.

Neotype (designated here): — PARAGUAY. Concepción: Estancia San Luis , 18 Apr 1980, L. Bernardi 20657 ( MBM [No. 99565 image!]; isoneotypes: MO [barcode MO-1057862], US [barcode 03229982 image!]) .

= Aspidosperma quirandy var. angustifolium Hassl. View in CoL in Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 12(325/330): 260. 1913. Holotype:— PARAGUAY. Zwischen Río Apa und Río Aquidaban, 1908–1909, K. Fiebrig 4292 [Herb. Hassler] (G [barcode G00108788 image!]; isotypes: BM [barcode BM000817584 ], G [barcode G00108787 image!], GH [barcode 00057218 image!], K [barcode K000587666 image!], L [barcode L0004433 image!]).

= Aspidosperma quirandy var. campestre Hassl. View in CoL in Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 12(325/330): 260. 1913. Lectotype (first-step lectotype designated by Woodson in Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 38(2): 151. 1951; second-step lectotype designated by Elsam et al. in Bonplandia 30(1): 28. 2021):— PARAGUAY. [Concepción]: Pr. Concepción, Aug 1901 /1902, E. Hassler 7199a (G (mounted on two herbarium sheets) [barcode G00108791 image!]; isolectotypes: G [barcode G00108789 image!] (mounted on two herbarium sheets), barcode G00108790 image! (mounted on two herbarium sheets), barcode G00108792 image!], K [barcode K000587664 image!, barcode K000587665 image!], MPU [barcode MPU022745 About MPU image!], NY [barcode 00297988 image!], P [barcode P00634401 image!, barcode P00634402 image!], S [No. S12-16253 image!]).

= Aspidosperma quirandy var. silvaticum Hassl. View in CoL in Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 12(325/330): 260. 1913. Lectotype (first-step lectotype designated by Woodson in Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 38(2): 151. 1951; second-step lectotype designated by Elsam et al. in Bonplandia 30(1): 28. 2021):— PARAGUAY. [Amambay]: Sierra de Amambay, prope Esperanza , Sep 1907 /1908, T. Rojas s.n. [E. Hassler [10601]] (G (mounted on two herbarium sheets) [barcode G00108799 image!]; isolectotypes: A [barcode 00057219 image!], C [barcode C10005750 image!], G [barcode G00108800 image!, barcode G00108801 image!], K [barcode K000587667 image!], LIL [barcode LIL001110 About LIL image!], MO [barcode MO-2246609 image!], NO [barcode NO0109663 image!], NY [barcode 00297990 image!], S [No. S12-16252 image!], US [barcode 00111814 image!]).

“ Aspidosperma malmei ” Hassl. , mss. in sched.

“ Aspidosperma silvatium ” (Hassl.) Meyer , mss. in sched.

“ Aspidosperma paraguariense ” Meyer , mss. in sched.

Notes — Elsam et al. (2021) proposed a lectotype for A. quirandy (G barcode G00108793). However, in the protologue of A. quirandy, Hassler (1913) only indicated specimens for its varieties (ICN article 26.3, Ex. 6; Turland et al. 2018). According to the ICN article 9.13 ( Turland et al. 2018): “If no original material is extant or as long as it is missing, a neotype may be selected.”. Thus, since we understand that this name has no nomenclatural type attached to it, we elected a specimen with follicles as the neotype of A. quirandy (MBM No. 99565) (ICN article 9.13; Turland et al. 2018). Also, the specimen cited by Woodson (1951) as the type of A. quirandy (“Hassler 2329”) is actually a paratype of A. occidentale Malme.

Woodson (1951) considered A. quirandy as a synonym of A. australe Müll.Arg. , but Elsam et al. (2021) reestablished the former. We agree with the reestablishment of A. quirandy because it presents subsessile or sessile leaves (vs. petiolate) with eucamptodromous venation (vs. brochidodromous), flowers with corolla lobes equal to or longer than the tube (2×) (vs. 2.5–4× smaller), and inflated follicles (vs. flattened).