Byasa genestieri (Oberthür, 1918) Hu & Cotton & Lamas & Duan & Zhang, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5362.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9D68D967-AE6A-4ED0-A063-E82E93F2DC3D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10168331 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A987A8-4935-FFC5-6FB9-FA25605CF883 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Byasa genestieri (Oberthür, 1918) |
status |
stat. nov. |
49. Byasa genestieri (Oberthür, 1918) stat. nov.
Papilio Latreillei Genestieri Oberth ü r, 1918; Bull. Soc. ent. Fr., 1918 (12): 187; TL: ‘Siao-lou, Tchang-chau-pin et au haut Lou-Tse-Kiang’ [Sichuan and Yunnan ( upper Mekong ), China].
Note: DNA analysis using the COI barcode from the first author’s lab, not previously published, found that the K2P genetic distance ( Kimura 1980) between Byasa genestieri and B. latreillei is 3.38%, and the support value on the IQ-Tree is 0.88 ( Xu 2022). This confirms the findings in a conference presentation by Deodati et al. (2007), who reported significant differences in COI sequences between the two taxa and stated they must be separate species. The main difference in male genitalia is the shape of the superuncus, which in B. latreillei is shorter, smooth and less curved downwardly, while in B. genestieri it is longer, hooked near the tip and evidently curved downwardly ( Figures 6–8 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 ). The female genitalia of the two are very similar except for the slight difference in lamella postvaginalis ( Figures 9 View FIGURE 9 and 10 View FIGURE 10 ). As a result, we separate Byasa genestieri and B. latreillei as distinct species (stat. nov.). Byasa genestieri comprises two subspecies, both occuring in Yunnan.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |