Amaurochrous cinctipes ( Say, 1828 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5015.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7FCE5D20-ACC8-41A5-A50D-697D2A686517 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5163045 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A9A276-1901-823D-FF6A-FD11FBB7FB9E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Amaurochrous cinctipes ( Say, 1828 ) |
status |
|
Amaurochrous cinctipes ( Say, 1828)
New state record: Ohio: Ottawa Co.: Crank Creek St. Pk., 15-IV-1995, M. O’Brien (1♂ UMMZ) .
Distribution: Canada: ON, QC. United States: AR, CT ( Parshley 1917, 1923a; Britton 1920; O’Donnell & Schaefer 2012), DC, DE, GA ( Scott & Fiske 1902), IA, IL, IN, KS, LA, MA, MD ( Brown & Bahr 2008), ME ( Roch 2020), MI, MN, MO, NC, ND ( Rider 2012), NE, NH ( Parshley 1917), NJ, NY, OH, OK ( Arnold & Drew 1988, Kondratieff et al. 2005), PA, SC, TN ( Howden & Crossley 1961), TX, VA ( Hoffman 1971), VT ( Roch 2020), WI ( Stål 1872).
Comments: It is possible that some of the records of this species and of the next, Amaurochrous dubius , have been confused. The two species are obviously very closely related. In fact, Barber & Sailer (1953) stated “there is some reason to question the status of cinctipes as a species distinct from dubius .” They further indicated that intermediates between the two species were known. Apparently, this is a more northern form.
UMMZ |
University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.