Alcaeorrhynchus grandis ( Dallas, 1851 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5015.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7FCE5D20-ACC8-41A5-A50D-697D2A686517 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5162475 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A9A276-192C-8217-FF6A-F901FD10FEDA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Alcaeorrhynchus grandis ( Dallas, 1851 ) |
status |
|
Alcaeorrhynchus grandis ( Dallas, 1851)
Distribution: United States: AL ( Meeds & Bertone 2021), AR, FL, GA ( McPherson et al. 1993, Meeds & Bertone 2021), KS ( Packauskas 2012, Meeds & Bertone 2021), LA ( Richman & Mead 1978, Meeds & Bertone 2021), MO ( Sites et al. 2012), MS ( Richmond 1962, Meeds & Bertone 2021), NC ( Meeds & Bertone 2021), NM (Bundy 2012), OK ( Chordas & McAllister 2019), SC ( Meeds & Bertone 2021), TX. ( Mexico, Central America, West Indies, South America)
Comments: Simons (1969) recorded this species from Alabama in an unpublished thesis, and there are also a number of recent photographs of this species from Alabama as well as South Carolina ( Meeds & Bertone 2021). Barton & Lee (1981) reported two records of this species from Arkansas, but given the known distribution at that time, they speculated that these records might be incidental records; accordingly, Froeschner (1988) listed the Arkansas record with a question mark. This species has now been reported from Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma so the records from Arkansas might very well be valid.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.